Evaluating the Impact of Cryptographic Algorithms on Network Performance

Samuel Asare, Winfred Yaokumah, Ernest B. B. Gyebi, J. Abdulai
{"title":"Evaluating the Impact of Cryptographic Algorithms on Network Performance","authors":"Samuel Asare, Winfred Yaokumah, Ernest B. B. Gyebi, J. Abdulai","doi":"10.4018/ijcac.309937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cryptographic algorithms enable secure data communication over public insecure networks. Though they enhance network security, complex cryptographic operations consume substantial amounts of computing resources, introducing significant network overhead costs. This study aims to find the cryptographic algorithm that can efficiently utilize network resources. The study evaluates three cryptographic algorithms with different file formats on varying numbers of node densities. The NS-3 simulator was used to measure latency, data throughput, end-to-end delay, packet delivery ratio, and packet loss of files in text, image, and audio formats. The results find AES as better than DES and 3DES for a large number of node densities for the three file formats in terms of latency, data throughput, end-to-end delay, and packet delivery ratio. However, DES has the lowest packet loss as AES records the highest packet loss. The findings provide researchers avenues for further research and the practitioners the choice of suitable algorithms based on the overhead performance.","PeriodicalId":442336,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Cloud Appl. Comput.","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Cloud Appl. Comput.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcac.309937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cryptographic algorithms enable secure data communication over public insecure networks. Though they enhance network security, complex cryptographic operations consume substantial amounts of computing resources, introducing significant network overhead costs. This study aims to find the cryptographic algorithm that can efficiently utilize network resources. The study evaluates three cryptographic algorithms with different file formats on varying numbers of node densities. The NS-3 simulator was used to measure latency, data throughput, end-to-end delay, packet delivery ratio, and packet loss of files in text, image, and audio formats. The results find AES as better than DES and 3DES for a large number of node densities for the three file formats in terms of latency, data throughput, end-to-end delay, and packet delivery ratio. However, DES has the lowest packet loss as AES records the highest packet loss. The findings provide researchers avenues for further research and the practitioners the choice of suitable algorithms based on the overhead performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估加密算法对网络性能的影响
加密算法可以在公共不安全的网络上实现安全的数据通信。虽然它们增强了网络安全性,但复杂的加密操作消耗了大量的计算资源,带来了巨大的网络开销成本。本研究旨在寻找能够有效利用网络资源的加密算法。该研究在不同节点密度下对三种不同文件格式的加密算法进行了评估。NS-3模拟器用于测量文本、图像和音频格式文件的延迟、数据吞吐量、端到端延迟、分组传送率和丢包率。结果发现,对于三种文件格式,在延迟、数据吞吐量、端到端延迟和数据包传递率方面,AES在大量节点密度下优于DES和3DES。DES丢包率最低,AES丢包率最高。研究结果为研究人员提供了进一步研究的途径,并为实践者根据开销性能选择合适的算法提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mitigating Risks in the Cloud-Based Metaverse Access Control Strategies and Techniques Using Supervised Learning to Detect Command and Control Attacks in IoT System Level Benchmarking of Public Clouds A Secure Framework to Prevent Three-Tier Cloud Architecture From Malicious Malware Injection Attacks Sociocultural Factors in Times of Global Crisis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1