Victimization in patients with vulvar dysesthesia/vestibulodynia. Is there an increased prevalence?

V. Dalton, H. Haefner, B. Reed, S. Senapati, A. Cook
{"title":"Victimization in patients with vulvar dysesthesia/vestibulodynia. Is there an increased prevalence?","authors":"V. Dalton, H. Haefner, B. Reed, S. Senapati, A. Cook","doi":"10.1097/00006254-200302000-00014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo examine the prevalence of physical or sexual violence victimization among women referred to a specialty clinic for management of vulvar dysesthesia/vestibulodynia as compared to a healthy gynecology clinic population.\n\n\nSTUDY DESIGN\nThe subjects in this case-control study were women who had completed routine questionnaires prior to presentation to the University of Michigan Center for Vulvar Diseases. Study subjects were all given a diagnosis of vulvar dysesthesia/vestibulodynia. Women without complaints of vulvar pain presenting to a gynecology clinic were enrolled as controls. Information was obtained from the control subjects using a questionnaire similar to the history forms completed by the study group.\n\n\nRESULTS\nComparisons were made between 242 patients with vulvar dysesthesia/vestibulodynia presenting to a specialty clinic and 113 controls. Cases were more likely to be Caucasian, to be married and to have a higher household income than controls but reported less drug or alcohol abuse and a lower frequency of sexual intercourse. After controlling for possible confounders, no relationship between sexual assault and the presence of vulvar dysesthesia/vestibulitis was found.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe prevalence of victimization was not higher in patients with vulvar dysesthesia/vestibulodynia as compared to the control population after controlling for potential confounding variables.","PeriodicalId":192418,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of reproductive medicine","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00006254-200302000-00014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To examine the prevalence of physical or sexual violence victimization among women referred to a specialty clinic for management of vulvar dysesthesia/vestibulodynia as compared to a healthy gynecology clinic population. STUDY DESIGN The subjects in this case-control study were women who had completed routine questionnaires prior to presentation to the University of Michigan Center for Vulvar Diseases. Study subjects were all given a diagnosis of vulvar dysesthesia/vestibulodynia. Women without complaints of vulvar pain presenting to a gynecology clinic were enrolled as controls. Information was obtained from the control subjects using a questionnaire similar to the history forms completed by the study group. RESULTS Comparisons were made between 242 patients with vulvar dysesthesia/vestibulodynia presenting to a specialty clinic and 113 controls. Cases were more likely to be Caucasian, to be married and to have a higher household income than controls but reported less drug or alcohol abuse and a lower frequency of sexual intercourse. After controlling for possible confounders, no relationship between sexual assault and the presence of vulvar dysesthesia/vestibulitis was found. CONCLUSION The prevalence of victimization was not higher in patients with vulvar dysesthesia/vestibulodynia as compared to the control population after controlling for potential confounding variables.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外阴感觉不良/前庭痛患者的受害。患病率增加了吗?
目的:与健康的妇科门诊人群相比,调查因外阴感觉不良/前庭痛而转诊到专科诊所的妇女遭受身体或性暴力侵害的发生率。研究设计:本病例对照研究的受试者为在密歇根大学外阴疾病中心就诊前完成常规问卷调查的女性。研究对象均被诊断为外阴感觉不良/前庭痛。没有外阴疼痛主诉的妇女被纳入妇科诊所作为对照。使用与研究组填写的病史表格类似的问卷从对照组获得信息。结果对242例外阴感觉不良/前庭痛在专科诊所就诊的患者和113例对照组进行了比较。病例更有可能是白人,已婚,家庭收入高于对照组,但据报告吸毒或酗酒较少,性交频率较低。在控制了可能的混杂因素后,没有发现性侵犯与外阴感觉不良/前庭炎之间的关系。结论在控制了潜在的混杂变量后,外阴感觉不良/前庭痛患者的受害发生率并不高于对照组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical Risk Factors Do Not Predict Shoulder Dystocia. Timing of Referral to the New England Trophoblastic Disease Center: Does Referral with Molar Pregnancy Versus Postmolar Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia Affect Outcomes? Quantitative Assessment of Endometrial Volume and Uterine Vascularity and Pregnancy Outcome in Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer Cycles. Birth Outcomes by Infertility Diagnosis Analyses of the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (MOSART). Blood Contaminated Amniotic Fluid and the Lamellar Body Count Fetal Lung Maturity Test.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1