Comparative joint position error in patients with non-specific neck disorders and asymptomatic age-matched individuals

J. Quartey, M. Ernst, A. Bello, Bertha Oppong-Yeboah, Emmanuel Bonney, Kow Acquaah, Felix Asomaning, Margaret Foli, Sandra Asante, Astrid Schaemann, C. Bauer
{"title":"Comparative joint position error in patients with non-specific neck disorders and asymptomatic age-matched individuals","authors":"J. Quartey, M. Ernst, A. Bello, Bertha Oppong-Yeboah, Emmanuel Bonney, Kow Acquaah, Felix Asomaning, Margaret Foli, Sandra Asante, Astrid Schaemann, C. Bauer","doi":"10.4102/sajp.v75i1.568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Neck pain is a common complaint worldwide and ranked seventh in 2010 as the cause of ‘years lived with disability’ in Ghana. Proprioceptive dysfunction, measured by joint position error (JPE) tests, indicates an association with neck pain frequency, dizziness and balance problems in patients. Objectives To examine proprioceptive deficits of the neck using a laser pointer attached to the head. Methods Twenty patients within the age group 21–60 years, with at least five points on the neck disability index (NDI), and 20 age- and sex-matched controls with less than five points on the NDI were recruited for this study. The JPE was determined wearing a headlight laser pointer directed towards a Cartesian coordinate system adjusted to x/y = 0/0, placed on a wall after returning from left and right rotation, flexion and extension. From starting in an upright sitting position, facing the Cartesian coordinate system, each participant performed five repetitions for each movement direction. The mean of five repetitions for each movement direction was calculated as absolute error (AE), constant error (CE) and variable error (VE). Results Control participants showed larger JPE values for nearly all AE, CE and VE. After repositioning from flexion controls showed an approximately 0.6 ° larger median JPE, and the opposite for extension, with median differences between 1 ° and 2 °. Conclusion The results of this study do not reveal any meaningful differences between patients with mild disabled neck movement compared with controls. Clinical implications Joint position error testing does not seem useful for patients with mild neck disability.","PeriodicalId":150074,"journal":{"name":"The South African Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The South African Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v75i1.568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background Neck pain is a common complaint worldwide and ranked seventh in 2010 as the cause of ‘years lived with disability’ in Ghana. Proprioceptive dysfunction, measured by joint position error (JPE) tests, indicates an association with neck pain frequency, dizziness and balance problems in patients. Objectives To examine proprioceptive deficits of the neck using a laser pointer attached to the head. Methods Twenty patients within the age group 21–60 years, with at least five points on the neck disability index (NDI), and 20 age- and sex-matched controls with less than five points on the NDI were recruited for this study. The JPE was determined wearing a headlight laser pointer directed towards a Cartesian coordinate system adjusted to x/y = 0/0, placed on a wall after returning from left and right rotation, flexion and extension. From starting in an upright sitting position, facing the Cartesian coordinate system, each participant performed five repetitions for each movement direction. The mean of five repetitions for each movement direction was calculated as absolute error (AE), constant error (CE) and variable error (VE). Results Control participants showed larger JPE values for nearly all AE, CE and VE. After repositioning from flexion controls showed an approximately 0.6 ° larger median JPE, and the opposite for extension, with median differences between 1 ° and 2 °. Conclusion The results of this study do not reveal any meaningful differences between patients with mild disabled neck movement compared with controls. Clinical implications Joint position error testing does not seem useful for patients with mild neck disability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非特异性颈部疾病患者和无症状年龄匹配个体的关节位置误差比较
颈痛是世界范围内的一种常见疾病,在2010年加纳的“残疾生活年数”中排名第七。本体感觉功能障碍,通过关节位置误差(JPE)测试来测量,表明与患者颈部疼痛频率、头晕和平衡问题有关。目的应用头部激光笔检查颈部本体感觉缺损。方法选取年龄在21 ~ 60岁、颈部残疾指数(NDI)≥5分的患者20例,以及年龄和性别匹配且NDI≤5分的对照组20例。JPE是戴着一个头灯激光笔确定的,指向一个调整为x/y = 0/0的笛卡尔坐标系,在左右旋转、弯曲和伸展返回后放置在墙上。从直立坐姿开始,面对笛卡尔坐标系,每个参与者在每个运动方向上重复五次。每个运动方向5次重复的平均值计算为绝对误差(AE)、恒定误差(CE)和可变误差(VE)。结果对照组几乎所有AE、CE和VE的JPE值都较大。屈曲对照组复位后,中位JPE增大约0.6°,伸直组则相反,中位差异在1°和2°之间。结论本研究结果未显示轻度颈部运动障碍患者与对照组相比有任何显著差异。临床意义关节位置误差测试似乎对轻度颈部残疾患者没有用处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum: Effects of breathing re-education on endurance, strength of deep neck flexors and pulmonary function in patients with chronic neck pain: A randomised controlled trial Global profile of individuals undergoing total knee replacement through the PROGRESS-PLUS equity lens: Protocol for a systematic review Outcome of survivors of COVID-19 in the intermediate phase of recovery: A case report Current knowledge and practice of post-stroke unilateral spatial neglect rehabilitation: A cross-sectional survey of South African neurorehabilitation physiotherapists Balance factors affecting the quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1