A Century of Dialogue around Durkheim as a Founding Father of the Social Sciences

W. van Binsbergen
{"title":"A Century of Dialogue around Durkheim as a Founding Father of the Social Sciences","authors":"W. van Binsbergen","doi":"10.1163/24683949-12340103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nIn 2012 social scientists, philosophers and religious scientists celebrated the centennial of the publication of one of the most seminal books in the modern study of religion, Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse, by the then leading French sociologist Emile Durkheim’s (1858–1917); in 2017, we commemorated that author’s untimely death at age 59, broken by World War I in which he lost his only son and many of his beloved students. Educated, first as a Rabinnical student then as a modern philosopher, Durkheim earned his place among French thinkers primarily as a “founding father” of the social sciences. Having recently (on the basis of a life-long preoccupation) devoted a book-length study to Durkheim’s religion theory, I intend in this essay to highlight major aspects of Durkheim as an exponent of French thought. I shall first briefly situate Durkheim in his time and age, with special emphasis on his political views and his ethnic identity as a secularised Jew. Then I turn to Durkheim’s relation with the discipline in which he was originally trained, philosophy. I shall pay attention to the complex relationship between Durkheim and Kant and further highlight his dualism, epistemology, and views on primitive classification, as well as his puzzling realism, the place of emergence in his thought, and his moralist tendencies. I shall finally articulate Durkheim’s transition to sociology and how he gave over the torch of emerging sociology to his main students, having thus created an adequate context in which to discuss Durkheim’s final masterpiece (Les formes) and the still dominant theory of religion it expounds.","PeriodicalId":160891,"journal":{"name":"Culture and Dialogue","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture and Dialogue","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/24683949-12340103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2012 social scientists, philosophers and religious scientists celebrated the centennial of the publication of one of the most seminal books in the modern study of religion, Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse, by the then leading French sociologist Emile Durkheim’s (1858–1917); in 2017, we commemorated that author’s untimely death at age 59, broken by World War I in which he lost his only son and many of his beloved students. Educated, first as a Rabinnical student then as a modern philosopher, Durkheim earned his place among French thinkers primarily as a “founding father” of the social sciences. Having recently (on the basis of a life-long preoccupation) devoted a book-length study to Durkheim’s religion theory, I intend in this essay to highlight major aspects of Durkheim as an exponent of French thought. I shall first briefly situate Durkheim in his time and age, with special emphasis on his political views and his ethnic identity as a secularised Jew. Then I turn to Durkheim’s relation with the discipline in which he was originally trained, philosophy. I shall pay attention to the complex relationship between Durkheim and Kant and further highlight his dualism, epistemology, and views on primitive classification, as well as his puzzling realism, the place of emergence in his thought, and his moralist tendencies. I shall finally articulate Durkheim’s transition to sociology and how he gave over the torch of emerging sociology to his main students, having thus created an adequate context in which to discuss Durkheim’s final masterpiece (Les formes) and the still dominant theory of religion it expounds.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
围绕迪尔凯姆作为社会科学奠基人的百年对话
2012年,社会科学家、哲学家和宗教科学家庆祝了现代宗教研究中最具开创性的著作之一《宗教生活的形式》出版100周年,该书由当时领先的法国社会学家埃米尔·迪尔凯姆(1858-1917)著;2017年,我们纪念了这位59岁的作家,他在第一次世界大战中不幸去世,失去了他唯一的儿子和许多心爱的学生。迪尔凯姆先是作为一名拉宾学派的学生,后来成为一名现代哲学家,他在法国思想家中赢得了一席之地,主要是作为社会科学的“奠基人”。最近(基于一生的关注),我花了一本书的篇幅来研究迪尔凯姆的宗教理论,我打算在这篇文章中强调迪尔凯姆作为法国思想倡导者的主要方面。首先,我将简要地把迪尔凯姆置于他的时代和时代,特别强调他的政治观点和他作为一个世俗化犹太人的民族身份。然后我转向迪尔凯姆与他最初接受训练的学科哲学的关系。我将关注迪尔凯姆和康德之间的复杂关系,并进一步强调他的二元论、认识论和原始分类的观点,以及他令人困惑的实在论,他在思想中的出现位置,以及他的道德主义倾向。最后,我将阐明迪尔凯姆向社会学的过渡,以及他如何将新兴社会学的火炬传递给他的主要学生,从而创造了一个适当的背景来讨论迪尔凯姆的最后杰作(Les forms)和它所阐述的仍然占主导地位的宗教理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
White Sugar and Dark Colonialism: Reflections on Girmitiyas and Coolies – Towards a new Paradigm of Reconciliation in Fiji Co-Présences, Hospitalités et Mutualités Rubble Walls of Contingency: Language, the Self, and the Mediterranean Imaginary La communauté méditerranéenne comme utopie du dépassement de l’anthropocène ? La notion de soi chez l’alcoolique : altérité et ipséité
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1