Improving Classification Accuracy of Detecting Error-Related Potentials using Two-stage Trained Neural Network Classifier

Praveen K. Parashiva, A. P. Vinod
{"title":"Improving Classification Accuracy of Detecting Error-Related Potentials using Two-stage Trained Neural Network Classifier","authors":"Praveen K. Parashiva, A. P. Vinod","doi":"10.1109/iCAST51195.2020.9319482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Error-Related Potential (Errp) is the bioelectric potential elicited in human brain as a result of the cognitive state of awareness when an error is perceived. Identifying ErrP from a single trial electroencephalogram (EEG) data can be used in taking corrective actions to fix the error or as a learning strategy in Brain Computer Interface (BCI) systems. The ErrP dataset recorded using EEG will contain both erroneous and correct actions. A classifier such as the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) can be trained to identify the erroneous versus correct action from a single trial EEG data. However, the classifier will have large number of parameters to be learned, and typically, the ErrP dataset is unbalanced with smaller number of erroneous trials. Therefore, the trained classifier may not generalize the data well. To classify the ErrP with better accuracy, an ANN architecture is proposed in this work. Learning the parameters of the ANN is carried out in two stages (Stage-1 and Stage-2) in the proposed method. The first stage of learning will have relatively large feature samples collected from several subjects. The first stage learning is aimed to capture the global characteristics of the ErrP. In the second stage, the pre-trained ANN classifier from the first stage is tuned for each subject. The ErrP dataset has two sessions dataset recorded from six subjects and the Stage-1 and Stage-2 training models are cross-validated. The overall classification accuracy achieved after cross-validation is 74.78 ± 3.43% and 86.03 ± 1.02% for erroneous and correct trials respectively. The improvement in the classification accuracy achieved is 12.67% and 15.51% for erroneous and correct trials respectively compared with the existing statistical classifier method. The method proposed shows an efficient way to train ANN classifier to achieve higher classification accuracy for unbalanced and smaller dataset such as ErrP.","PeriodicalId":212570,"journal":{"name":"2020 11th International Conference on Awareness Science and Technology (iCAST)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 11th International Conference on Awareness Science and Technology (iCAST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/iCAST51195.2020.9319482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Error-Related Potential (Errp) is the bioelectric potential elicited in human brain as a result of the cognitive state of awareness when an error is perceived. Identifying ErrP from a single trial electroencephalogram (EEG) data can be used in taking corrective actions to fix the error or as a learning strategy in Brain Computer Interface (BCI) systems. The ErrP dataset recorded using EEG will contain both erroneous and correct actions. A classifier such as the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) can be trained to identify the erroneous versus correct action from a single trial EEG data. However, the classifier will have large number of parameters to be learned, and typically, the ErrP dataset is unbalanced with smaller number of erroneous trials. Therefore, the trained classifier may not generalize the data well. To classify the ErrP with better accuracy, an ANN architecture is proposed in this work. Learning the parameters of the ANN is carried out in two stages (Stage-1 and Stage-2) in the proposed method. The first stage of learning will have relatively large feature samples collected from several subjects. The first stage learning is aimed to capture the global characteristics of the ErrP. In the second stage, the pre-trained ANN classifier from the first stage is tuned for each subject. The ErrP dataset has two sessions dataset recorded from six subjects and the Stage-1 and Stage-2 training models are cross-validated. The overall classification accuracy achieved after cross-validation is 74.78 ± 3.43% and 86.03 ± 1.02% for erroneous and correct trials respectively. The improvement in the classification accuracy achieved is 12.67% and 15.51% for erroneous and correct trials respectively compared with the existing statistical classifier method. The method proposed shows an efficient way to train ANN classifier to achieve higher classification accuracy for unbalanced and smaller dataset such as ErrP.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用两阶段训练神经网络分类器提高错误相关电位检测的分类精度
错误相关电位(error - related Potential, Errp)是人类在感知到错误时,由于认知意识状态而在大脑中引发的生物电电位。从单个试验脑电图(EEG)数据中识别ErrP可用于采取纠正措施以修复错误或作为脑机接口(BCI)系统中的学习策略。使用EEG记录的ErrP数据集将包含错误和正确的操作。像人工神经网络(ANN)这样的分类器可以被训练来从单个试验脑电图数据中识别错误和正确的动作。然而,分类器将有大量的参数需要学习,通常,ErrP数据集是不平衡的,错误试验的数量较少。因此,训练好的分类器可能不能很好地泛化数据。为了更好地对ErrP进行分类,本文提出了一种人工神经网络体系结构。在本文提出的方法中,人工神经网络的参数学习分为两个阶段(阶段1和阶段2)进行。学习的第一阶段将从几个科目中收集相对较大的特征样本。第一阶段学习的目的是捕捉ErrP的全局特征。在第二阶段,针对每个主题对第一阶段预训练的ANN分类器进行调整。ErrP数据集有两个会话数据集,记录了来自六个受试者的数据集,并且交叉验证了第一阶段和第二阶段的训练模型。交叉验证后,错误试验和正确试验的总体分类准确率分别为74.78±3.43%和86.03±1.02%。与现有的统计分类器方法相比,该方法的误试和正确率分别提高了12.67%和15.51%。本文提出的方法是一种有效的训练ANN分类器的方法,可以在ErrP等不平衡和较小的数据集上实现更高的分类精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Skeleton Guided Conflict-Free Hand Gesture Recognition for Robot Control Improved Spiking Neural Networks with multiple neurons for digit recognition A Lightweight Transformer with Convolutional Attention Social Media Mining with Dynamic Clustering: A Case Study by COVID-19 Tweets A Visual-SLAM based Line Laser Scanning System using Semantically Segmented Images
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1