Correcting for the Missing Rich: An Application to Wealth Survey Data

P. Eckerstorfer, Jan Halák, Jakob Kapeller, B. Schütz, Florian Springholz, Rafael Wildauer
{"title":"Correcting for the Missing Rich: An Application to Wealth Survey Data","authors":"P. Eckerstorfer, Jan Halák, Jakob Kapeller, B. Schütz, Florian Springholz, Rafael Wildauer","doi":"10.1111/roiw.12188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is a well-known criticism that if the distribution of wealth is highly concentrated, survey data are hardly reliable when it comes to analyzing the richest parts of society. This paper addresses this criticism by providing a general rationale of the underlying methodological problem as well as by proposing a specific methodological approach tailored to correcting the arising bias. We illustrate the latter approach by using Austrian data from the Household Finance and Consumption Survey. Specifically, we identify suitable parameter combinations by using a series of maximum-likelihood estimates and appropriate goodness-of-fit tests to avoid arbitrariness with respect to the fitting of the Pareto distribution. Our results suggest that the alleged non-observation bias is considerable, accounting for about one quarter of total net wealth in the case of Austria. The method developed in this paper can easily be applied to other countries where survey data on wealth are available.","PeriodicalId":410371,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Welfare Economics & Collective Decision-Making (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"72","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Welfare Economics & Collective Decision-Making (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 72

Abstract

It is a well-known criticism that if the distribution of wealth is highly concentrated, survey data are hardly reliable when it comes to analyzing the richest parts of society. This paper addresses this criticism by providing a general rationale of the underlying methodological problem as well as by proposing a specific methodological approach tailored to correcting the arising bias. We illustrate the latter approach by using Austrian data from the Household Finance and Consumption Survey. Specifically, we identify suitable parameter combinations by using a series of maximum-likelihood estimates and appropriate goodness-of-fit tests to avoid arbitrariness with respect to the fitting of the Pareto distribution. Our results suggest that the alleged non-observation bias is considerable, accounting for about one quarter of total net wealth in the case of Austria. The method developed in this paper can easily be applied to other countries where survey data on wealth are available.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纠正失踪的富人:财富调查数据的应用
有人批评说,如果财富的分配高度集中,那么在分析社会中最富有的部分时,调查数据几乎是不可靠的。本文通过提供潜在的方法问题的一般原理,以及提出一种专门的方法方法来纠正产生的偏见,从而解决了这种批评。我们通过使用奥地利家庭金融和消费调查的数据来说明后一种方法。具体来说,我们通过使用一系列最大似然估计和适当的拟合优度检验来确定合适的参数组合,以避免Pareto分布拟合的随意性。我们的研究结果表明,所谓的非观察偏差是相当大的,在奥地利的情况下,约占总净财富的四分之一。本文开发的方法可以很容易地应用于其他有财富调查数据的国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tradable mobility permits in a monocentric city with pre-existing labor taxation: a general equilibrium perspective Collective Action and Intra-group Conflict with Fixed Budgets Expected Neediness and the Formation of Mutual Support Arrangements: Evidence from the Philippines Consumer Status Signaling, Wealth Inequality and Non-deceptive Counterfeits Welfare Measurement and Poverty Targeting Based on Participatory Wealth Rankings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1