Sentiment Analysis Using AI: A Comparative Study Comparative Study of 5 Different Algorithms and Benchmarking Them with A Qualitative Analysis of Training time, Prediction time, and Accuracy

J. Biswas, M. Haid, Ishak Boyaci, Indrashis Nath, Bharat Hegde, Oliver Janssen, Oliver Kohl, Andreas Minarski
{"title":"Sentiment Analysis Using AI: A Comparative Study Comparative Study of 5 Different Algorithms and Benchmarking Them with A Qualitative Analysis of Training time, Prediction time, and Accuracy","authors":"J. Biswas, M. Haid, Ishak Boyaci, Indrashis Nath, Bharat Hegde, Oliver Janssen, Oliver Kohl, Andreas Minarski","doi":"10.1145/3459104.3459165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sentiment analysis also called Opinion Mining has been one of the most ancient topics in Natural Language Processing (NLP). NLP which is a subfield of AI enables machines to read, understand, interpret and manipulate human languages. The netizens often express their sentiments through tweets, reviews and ratings. Therefore, it's becoming increasingly popular to analyse these sentiments for commercial applications such as market analysis, product reviews, customer services and many more. This analysis can either be lexicon-based or machine learning-based. Lexicon-based techniques use dictionaries of words, which is then used to calculate a score for the polarity. Machine learning-based classifiers use a dataset to train a model which is used to find the sentiment of a sentence or a paragraph. ML-based approaches are more robust compared to the lexicon-based approach. The main contribution of this paper is to demonstrate the performance of various Machine Learning and Deep Learning models in Sentiment Analysis. In this paper, various models viz. Multinomial Naive Bayes(MNB), Support Vector Machine(SVM), Hidden Markov Model(HMM), Long Short Term Memory(LSTM) and Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers(BERT), are trained through supervised learning, and then they are benchmarked through a qualitative analysis of accuracy, effectiveness and speed to provide an extensive overview of the various algorithms used in the field. The performance comparison of the various models presents an in-depth understanding of the different techniques within the framework of a comprehensive evaluation and discussion.","PeriodicalId":142284,"journal":{"name":"2021 International Symposium on Electrical, Electronics and Information Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 International Symposium on Electrical, Electronics and Information Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3459104.3459165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Sentiment analysis also called Opinion Mining has been one of the most ancient topics in Natural Language Processing (NLP). NLP which is a subfield of AI enables machines to read, understand, interpret and manipulate human languages. The netizens often express their sentiments through tweets, reviews and ratings. Therefore, it's becoming increasingly popular to analyse these sentiments for commercial applications such as market analysis, product reviews, customer services and many more. This analysis can either be lexicon-based or machine learning-based. Lexicon-based techniques use dictionaries of words, which is then used to calculate a score for the polarity. Machine learning-based classifiers use a dataset to train a model which is used to find the sentiment of a sentence or a paragraph. ML-based approaches are more robust compared to the lexicon-based approach. The main contribution of this paper is to demonstrate the performance of various Machine Learning and Deep Learning models in Sentiment Analysis. In this paper, various models viz. Multinomial Naive Bayes(MNB), Support Vector Machine(SVM), Hidden Markov Model(HMM), Long Short Term Memory(LSTM) and Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers(BERT), are trained through supervised learning, and then they are benchmarked through a qualitative analysis of accuracy, effectiveness and speed to provide an extensive overview of the various algorithms used in the field. The performance comparison of the various models presents an in-depth understanding of the different techniques within the framework of a comprehensive evaluation and discussion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
5种不同算法的比较研究,并对它们进行基准测试,对训练时间、预测时间和准确性进行定性分析
情感分析也被称为观点挖掘,是自然语言处理(NLP)中最古老的主题之一。NLP是人工智能的一个子领域,它使机器能够阅读、理解、解释和操纵人类语言。网友们经常通过推特、评论和评分来表达他们的情绪。因此,在商业应用中分析这些情绪变得越来越流行,比如市场分析、产品评论、客户服务等等。这种分析可以是基于词典的,也可以是基于机器学习的。基于词典的技术使用单词字典,然后用它来计算极性的分数。基于机器学习的分类器使用数据集来训练模型,该模型用于查找句子或段落的情感。与基于词典的方法相比,基于ml的方法更加健壮。本文的主要贡献是展示了各种机器学习和深度学习模型在情感分析中的性能。在本文中,各种模型,即多项Naive Bayes(MNB),支持向量机(SVM),隐马尔可夫模型(HMM),长短期记忆(LSTM)和双向编码器表示从变压器(BERT),通过监督学习训练,然后通过定性分析的准确性,有效性和速度对它们进行基准测试,以提供在该领域使用的各种算法的广泛概述。各种模型的性能比较在综合评估和讨论的框架内提供了对不同技术的深入理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Integration of Blockchain Technology and IoT in a Smart University Application Architecture 3D Moving Rigid Body Localization in the Presence of Anchor Position Errors RANS/LES Simulation of Low-Frequency Flow Oscillations on a NACA0012 Airfoil Near Stall Tuning Language Representation Models for Classification of Turkish News Improving Consumer Experience for Medical Information Using Text Analytics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1