Sickness absence and control of insulin-treated diabetes as assessed by glycosylated haemoglobin.

E R Waclawski
{"title":"Sickness absence and control of insulin-treated diabetes as assessed by glycosylated haemoglobin.","authors":"E R Waclawski","doi":"10.1093/occmed/41.3.119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The sickness absence records for 1986 were obtained for 63 employed insulin-treated diabetic patients who had glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1) measurements during that year. One subject whose absence was associated with attempts to improve control because of pregnancy was excluded from the analysis. Fifteen had good control (HbA1 8.5 per cent or less) and 47 had poor control (HbA1 greater than 8.5%). The groups were similar for age, sex, duration of diabetes and occupation. The distribution of sickness absence showed greater frequency of absence (p less than 0.05), greater number of working days lost (p less than 0.02), and greater average duration of absence (p less than 0.04) among those diabetic workers with poor control compared to those with good control. Because some individuals with poor control had no absence, HbA1 measurement cannot be recommended on its own to identify those workers who will be absent from work. Its use may lie in indicating a level below which sickness absence is minimized.</p>","PeriodicalId":76684,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Society of Occupational Medicine","volume":"41 3","pages":"119-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/occmed/41.3.119","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Society of Occupational Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/41.3.119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The sickness absence records for 1986 were obtained for 63 employed insulin-treated diabetic patients who had glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1) measurements during that year. One subject whose absence was associated with attempts to improve control because of pregnancy was excluded from the analysis. Fifteen had good control (HbA1 8.5 per cent or less) and 47 had poor control (HbA1 greater than 8.5%). The groups were similar for age, sex, duration of diabetes and occupation. The distribution of sickness absence showed greater frequency of absence (p less than 0.05), greater number of working days lost (p less than 0.02), and greater average duration of absence (p less than 0.04) among those diabetic workers with poor control compared to those with good control. Because some individuals with poor control had no absence, HbA1 measurement cannot be recommended on its own to identify those workers who will be absent from work. Its use may lie in indicating a level below which sickness absence is minimized.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
糖化血红蛋白评估胰岛素治疗糖尿病的疾病消失和控制。
我们获得了63名接受胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者1986年的缺勤记录,这些患者在当年进行了糖化血红蛋白(HbA1)测量。一名因怀孕而试图改善控制的受试者被排除在分析之外。15例控制良好(HbA1小于等于8.5%),47例控制不良(HbA1大于8.5%)。两组在年龄、性别、糖尿病病程和职业方面相似。与控制良好的糖尿病工人相比,控制较差的糖尿病工人病假缺勤频率更高(p < 0.05),旷工天数更多(p < 0.02),平均缺勤时间更长(p < 0.04)。由于一些控制能力差的个体没有缺勤,HbA1测量不能单独推荐用于识别那些将缺勤的员工。它的用途可能在于指示一个水平,在这个水平以下病假是最少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Disabled people and jobs. The occupational physician. Occupational health and hygiene following a fire in a warehouse with an asbestos cement roof. Economic indicators and involvement of health professionals at worksite health services in a developing country. Absence and labour turnover in a foundry attributable to respiratory disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1