Chapter 3 Preventing a Repetition of the Great War: Responding to International Terrorism in the 1930s

Michael D. Callahan
{"title":"Chapter 3 Preventing a Repetition of the Great War: Responding to International Terrorism in the 1930s","authors":"Michael D. Callahan","doi":"10.5771/9783845299167-85","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On 9 October 1934, King Alexander I of Yugoslavia was assassinated as he arrived in Marseilles to begin a state visit to France.1 Louis Barthou, the French foreign minister, was wounded during the chaos and died later. Evidence quickly established that anti-Yugoslav terrorist groups based in Italy and trained in Hungary had carried out the attack. The terrorists’ ultimate goal was to destabilize the multi-ethnic Yugoslavia and create new nation states. Much like the shooting of the Archduke Franz Ferdinand at Sarajevo twenty years before, Alexander’s murder sparked an international crisis that threatened the peace of Europe. France supported Yugoslavia; Italy the Hungarians. In the background were alliances and individual states interested in either defending or changing the European status quo. All the ingredients of the July Crisis of 1914 seemed suddenly there again. While these two terrorist attacks had important similarities, their repercussions were very different. According to its Covenant, the main purposes of the League of Nations were ‘to promote international co-operation and to achieve international peace and security.’2 These central aims were in fact accomplished in 1934, an achievement that represents the League at its most effective. With strong leadership from Britain and France, the League made it possible for states to adopt a unanimous resolution that preserved the peace that all sides wanted. During its successful mediation the League Council decided to confront the serious problem of international terrorism. Jurists and officials from several countries would spend nearly three years exploring ways to classify specific terrorist acts, and conspiracies to commit them, as international Chapter 3","PeriodicalId":431930,"journal":{"name":"Peace Through Law","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peace Through Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845299167-85","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On 9 October 1934, King Alexander I of Yugoslavia was assassinated as he arrived in Marseilles to begin a state visit to France.1 Louis Barthou, the French foreign minister, was wounded during the chaos and died later. Evidence quickly established that anti-Yugoslav terrorist groups based in Italy and trained in Hungary had carried out the attack. The terrorists’ ultimate goal was to destabilize the multi-ethnic Yugoslavia and create new nation states. Much like the shooting of the Archduke Franz Ferdinand at Sarajevo twenty years before, Alexander’s murder sparked an international crisis that threatened the peace of Europe. France supported Yugoslavia; Italy the Hungarians. In the background were alliances and individual states interested in either defending or changing the European status quo. All the ingredients of the July Crisis of 1914 seemed suddenly there again. While these two terrorist attacks had important similarities, their repercussions were very different. According to its Covenant, the main purposes of the League of Nations were ‘to promote international co-operation and to achieve international peace and security.’2 These central aims were in fact accomplished in 1934, an achievement that represents the League at its most effective. With strong leadership from Britain and France, the League made it possible for states to adopt a unanimous resolution that preserved the peace that all sides wanted. During its successful mediation the League Council decided to confront the serious problem of international terrorism. Jurists and officials from several countries would spend nearly three years exploring ways to classify specific terrorist acts, and conspiracies to commit them, as international Chapter 3
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第三章防止第一次世界大战的重演:应对20世纪30年代的国际恐怖主义
1934年10月9日,南斯拉夫国王亚历山大一世在抵达马赛开始对法国进行国事访问时被暗杀,法国外交部长路易斯·巴尔杜在混乱中受伤,后来死亡。证据很快证实,总部设在意大利并在匈牙利受过训练的反南斯拉夫恐怖组织实施了这次袭击。恐怖分子的最终目标是破坏多民族的南斯拉夫的稳定,并建立新的民族国家。就像20年前弗朗茨·斐迪南大公在萨拉热窝被枪杀一样,亚历山大之死引发了一场威胁欧洲和平的国际危机。法国支持南斯拉夫;意大利,匈牙利人。背景是有意捍卫或改变欧洲现状的联盟和个别国家。1914年七月危机的所有因素似乎突然又出现了。虽然这两次恐怖袭击有重要的相似之处,但其后果却大不相同。根据其《公约》,国际联盟的主要目的是“促进国际合作,实现国际和平与安全”。事实上,这些核心目标在1934年就已经实现了,这一成就代表了联盟最有效的状态。在英国和法国的强有力领导下,国联使各国能够一致通过一项决议,维护各方所希望的和平。在成功的调解期间,联盟理事会决定正视国际恐怖主义这一严重问题。来自几个国家的法学家和官员将花费近三年的时间来探索如何将具体的恐怖主义行为及其阴谋归类为国际第三章
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Chapter 11 International Adjudication of Private Rights: The Mixed Arbitral Tribunals in the Peace Treaties of 1919–1922 Chapter 7 The Role of Private International Law: UNIDROIT and the Geneva Conventions on Arbitration Chapter 6 Managing the ‘Workers Threat’: Preventing Revolution Through the International Labour Organization Chapter 12 Local International Adjudication: The Groundbreaking ‘Experiment’ of the Arbitral Tribunal for Upper Silesia Chapter 13 Resistance Through Law: Belgian Judges and the Relations Between Occupied State and Occupying Power
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1