Epistemological sensitisation causes deeper elaboration during self-regulated learning

S. Pieschl, R. Bromme, Torsten Porsch, E. Stahl
{"title":"Epistemological sensitisation causes deeper elaboration during self-regulated learning","authors":"S. Pieschl, R. Bromme, Torsten Porsch, E. Stahl","doi":"10.22318/ICLS2008.2.213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous research indicates that students' adaptation to task complexity in the planning stages of self-regulated learning are related to their epistemological beliefs (Stahl, Pieschl, & Bromme, 2006), but it is an open issue if students enact similar strategies in subsequent stages. Based on the COPES-model (Winne & Hadwin, 1998) the impact of epistemological beliefs on learning is tested here experimentally. In this study, students (21 humanities students, 14 biology students) had to solve five tasks of different complexity (Anderson et al., 2001) with a hypertext on \"genetic fingerprinting\". Results indicate that students adapted their concurrent thoughts and concurrent actions to task complexity in this enactment stage. An epistemological sensitisation was administered that elicited more \"sophisticated\" beliefs and caused more elaborate learning processes. For example, students with this sensitisation employed more metacognitive planning, especially for more complex tasks. Additionally, effects of prior domain knowledge were investigated.","PeriodicalId":145751,"journal":{"name":"International Conference of the Learning Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference of the Learning Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22318/ICLS2008.2.213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Previous research indicates that students' adaptation to task complexity in the planning stages of self-regulated learning are related to their epistemological beliefs (Stahl, Pieschl, & Bromme, 2006), but it is an open issue if students enact similar strategies in subsequent stages. Based on the COPES-model (Winne & Hadwin, 1998) the impact of epistemological beliefs on learning is tested here experimentally. In this study, students (21 humanities students, 14 biology students) had to solve five tasks of different complexity (Anderson et al., 2001) with a hypertext on "genetic fingerprinting". Results indicate that students adapted their concurrent thoughts and concurrent actions to task complexity in this enactment stage. An epistemological sensitisation was administered that elicited more "sophisticated" beliefs and caused more elaborate learning processes. For example, students with this sensitisation employed more metacognitive planning, especially for more complex tasks. Additionally, effects of prior domain knowledge were investigated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认识论敏化在自我调节学习过程中引起更深层次的阐述
先前的研究表明,学生在自我调节学习的计划阶段对任务复杂性的适应与他们的认识论信念有关(Stahl, Pieschl, & Bromme, 2006),但如果学生在随后的阶段采取类似的策略,这是一个开放的问题。基于copes模型(Winne & Hadwin, 1998),本文通过实验测试了认识论信念对学习的影响。在本研究中,学生(21名人文专业学生,14名生物专业学生)必须用关于“基因指纹”的超文本解决五个不同复杂程度的任务(Anderson et al., 2001)。结果表明,学生在设定阶段的并行思维和并行行为适应了任务复杂性。一种认识论上的敏感化引发了更“复杂”的信念,并导致了更复杂的学习过程。例如,具有这种敏感性的学生使用更多的元认知计划,特别是对于更复杂的任务。此外,研究了先验领域知识的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Data Literacies and Social Justice: Exploring Critical Data Literacies through Sociocultural Perspectives Robot Block-based Coding in Preschool Teachers' Conceptualizations of Computational and Mathematical Thinking Encouraging Revision of Scientific Ideas with Critique in an Online Genetics Unit Filling in the Gaps: Capturing Social Regulation in an Interactive Tabletop Learning Environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1