Mindfulness-informed (ACT) and Mindfulness-based Programs (MBSR/MBCT) applied for college students to reduce symptoms of depression and anxiety

Liang Ma , Yanjie Wang , Le Pan , Zeshi Cui , Philip J. Schluter
{"title":"Mindfulness-informed (ACT) and Mindfulness-based Programs (MBSR/MBCT) applied for college students to reduce symptoms of depression and anxiety","authors":"Liang Ma ,&nbsp;Yanjie Wang ,&nbsp;Le Pan ,&nbsp;Zeshi Cui ,&nbsp;Philip J. Schluter","doi":"10.1016/j.jbct.2022.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>This meta-analysis examines the effects of mindfulness-informed and mindfulness-based interventions including acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) on depressive and anxiety symptoms among college students. Three electronic databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Central) were utilized and systematically searched. Effect estimates were reported as </span>standardized mean differences (SMDs) and data were pooled using random-effects models. Twenty-two comparisons derived from 19 studies (2716 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. For studies employing passive control conditions (</span><em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->17), post-intervention effect sizes were significant for depressive (0.47 [95% CI: 0. 32–0.63]) and anxiety symptoms (0.58 [95% CI: 0.34–0.82]). Effect sizes were significant at post-intervention among MBCT (0.76 [95% CI: 0.48–1.03] for depressive symptoms and 1.37 [95% CI: 0.70–2.04] for anxiety symptoms) and MBSR (0.58 [95% CI: 0.31–0.86] for depressive symptoms and 0.49 [95% CI: 0.24–0.73] for anxiety symptoms). The effect size of ACT for depressive symptoms at post-intervention was significant (0.28 [95% CI: 0.09–0.48]), but the post-intervention effect size of ACT for anxiety symptoms was not significant (0.23 [95% CI: −0.01 −0.47]). Our analyses showed no superiority for ACT, MBSR, and MBCT to active control conditions, either when they were combined or considered separately. This meta-analysis provides empirical evidence in support of ACT, MBSR, and MBCT for reducing depressive and anxiety symptoms among college students.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36022,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy","volume":"32 4","pages":"Pages 271-289"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589979122000294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This meta-analysis examines the effects of mindfulness-informed and mindfulness-based interventions including acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) on depressive and anxiety symptoms among college students. Three electronic databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Central) were utilized and systematically searched. Effect estimates were reported as standardized mean differences (SMDs) and data were pooled using random-effects models. Twenty-two comparisons derived from 19 studies (2716 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. For studies employing passive control conditions (n = 17), post-intervention effect sizes were significant for depressive (0.47 [95% CI: 0. 32–0.63]) and anxiety symptoms (0.58 [95% CI: 0.34–0.82]). Effect sizes were significant at post-intervention among MBCT (0.76 [95% CI: 0.48–1.03] for depressive symptoms and 1.37 [95% CI: 0.70–2.04] for anxiety symptoms) and MBSR (0.58 [95% CI: 0.31–0.86] for depressive symptoms and 0.49 [95% CI: 0.24–0.73] for anxiety symptoms). The effect size of ACT for depressive symptoms at post-intervention was significant (0.28 [95% CI: 0.09–0.48]), but the post-intervention effect size of ACT for anxiety symptoms was not significant (0.23 [95% CI: −0.01 −0.47]). Our analyses showed no superiority for ACT, MBSR, and MBCT to active control conditions, either when they were combined or considered separately. This meta-analysis provides empirical evidence in support of ACT, MBSR, and MBCT for reducing depressive and anxiety symptoms among college students.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正念通知(ACT)和正念基础项目(MBSR/MBCT)适用于大学生,以减轻抑郁和焦虑的症状
本荟萃分析考察了正念干预和正念干预对大学生抑郁和焦虑症状的影响,包括接受和承诺疗法(ACT)、正念减压疗法(MBSR)和正念认知疗法(MBCT)。三个电子数据库(PubMed, PsycINFO和Cochrane Central)被利用并系统地检索。效应估计以标准化平均差异(SMDs)报告,数据采用随机效应模型汇总。meta分析包括来自19项研究(2716名参与者)的22个比较。对于采用被动控制条件的研究(n = 17),干预后对抑郁症的效应量显著(0.47 [95% CI: 0。32-0.63])和焦虑症状(0.58 [95% CI: 0.34-0.82])。干预后MBCT(抑郁症状为0.76 [95% CI: 0.48-1.03],焦虑症状为1.37 [95% CI: 0.70-2.04])和MBSR(抑郁症状为0.58 [95% CI: 0.31-0.86],焦虑症状为0.49 [95% CI: 0.24-0.73])的效应量显著。干预后ACT对抑郁症状的效应量显著(0.28 [95% CI: 0.09-0.48]),但ACT对焦虑症状的干预后效应量不显著(0.23 [95% CI: - 0.01 - 0.47])。我们的分析显示ACT、MBSR和MBCT在主动控制条件下没有优势,无论是联合使用还是单独考虑。本荟萃分析提供了实证证据,支持ACT、MBSR和MBCT在减轻大学生抑郁和焦虑症状方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy
Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
60 days
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of online mental health education on occupational burnout among medical staff Analyzing data in single-case experimental designs: Objectives and available software options The effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy in mental health problems of children and adolescents in child protection system: A meta-analysis Assessing user acceptance of a mental health app & its impact on depression and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder related knowledge: A mixed method experimental study Morphological changes and body representation: A study of the link between weight cycling and body schema disturbances
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1