CAP Reform and the Objectives of the Common Agricultural Policy

M. Cardwell
{"title":"CAP Reform and the Objectives of the Common Agricultural Policy","authors":"M. Cardwell","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2272004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While the Treaty objectives of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) as now expressed in Article 39 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union may not themselves have been amended, this contribution considers whether amendments elsewhere within the Treaty, together with interpretation by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), have gone some way towards producing a broader Treaty framework, more sensitive to the numerous demands now being made of agriculture. Although there are grounds for holding that there is not full alignment between the current reform proposals and the Treaty objectives of the CAP as enshrined in Article 39(1) TFEU, together with the broader Treaty framework, some caution might be prudent before proceeding to major Treaty amendment. The original objectives as laid down in the Treaty of Rome have found a new resilience and are perhaps more relevant now than two decades ago, so any amendment might usefully take the form of expansion as opposed to deletion, as it is not difficult to conceive that each of the five original objectives will be accorded at least temporary priority over the years ahead.","PeriodicalId":375754,"journal":{"name":"Public International Law eJournal","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public International Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2272004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While the Treaty objectives of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) as now expressed in Article 39 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union may not themselves have been amended, this contribution considers whether amendments elsewhere within the Treaty, together with interpretation by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), have gone some way towards producing a broader Treaty framework, more sensitive to the numerous demands now being made of agriculture. Although there are grounds for holding that there is not full alignment between the current reform proposals and the Treaty objectives of the CAP as enshrined in Article 39(1) TFEU, together with the broader Treaty framework, some caution might be prudent before proceeding to major Treaty amendment. The original objectives as laid down in the Treaty of Rome have found a new resilience and are perhaps more relevant now than two decades ago, so any amendment might usefully take the form of expansion as opposed to deletion, as it is not difficult to conceive that each of the five original objectives will be accorded at least temporary priority over the years ahead.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共同农业政策改革与共同农业政策目标
虽然《欧洲联盟运作条约》第39条所表达的共同农业政策(CAP)的条约目标本身可能没有得到修正,但这一贡献考虑了条约内其他地方的修正,以及欧洲联盟法院(CJEU)的解释,是否已经在某种程度上产生了一个更广泛的条约框架,对目前对农业提出的众多要求更加敏感。虽然有理由认为,目前的改革建议与《欧盟条约》第39条第1款所载的共同农业政策的条约目标以及更广泛的条约框架之间没有完全一致,但在进行重大的条约修正之前,可能需要谨慎行事。《罗马条约》规定的最初目标有了新的弹性,现在可能比二十年前更有意义,因此,任何修正案都可能采取扩大而不是删除的形式,因为不难想象,在未来几年里,最初的五个目标中的每一个都将至少暂时得到优先考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Dual‐Nature Thesis: Which Dualism? Legality and the Legal Relation Soldiers as Public Officials: A Moral Justification for Combatant Immunity A Pragmatic Reconstruction of Law's Claim to Authority Ownership, Use, and Exclusivity: The Kantian Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1