Problem of Defining Terrorism under International Law: Definition by the Appeal Chamber of Special Tribunal for Lebanon as a Solution to the Problem

H. Bekele
{"title":"Problem of Defining Terrorism under International Law: Definition by the Appeal Chamber of Special Tribunal for Lebanon as a Solution to the Problem","authors":"H. Bekele","doi":"10.4236/blr.2021.122033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the quest for the legal definition of terrorism under international law. By employing doctrinal research methodology, the paper qualitatively analyze international legal instruments, customary international law, and decisions of international courts and works of various scholars. In doing so, the article first discusses about the difficulty of defining terrorism under international law. In addition, the paper will discuss about the major attempts to define terrorism both by scholars and legally. In dealing with the quest for legal definition, the paper will explore the various attempts to define terrorism by treaty laws and the lacuna thereof. Furthermore, it discusses the definition provided by the Appeals Chamber of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL). Accordingly, the paper calls on the significance of the definition provided by STL for the reason that the decision incorporated elements provided by various UN Resolutions and treaties, customary international law and domestic courts. Hence, the definition by STL should be taken as a universally agreeable one.","PeriodicalId":300394,"journal":{"name":"Beijing Law Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beijing Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/blr.2021.122033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article explores the quest for the legal definition of terrorism under international law. By employing doctrinal research methodology, the paper qualitatively analyze international legal instruments, customary international law, and decisions of international courts and works of various scholars. In doing so, the article first discusses about the difficulty of defining terrorism under international law. In addition, the paper will discuss about the major attempts to define terrorism both by scholars and legally. In dealing with the quest for legal definition, the paper will explore the various attempts to define terrorism by treaty laws and the lacuna thereof. Furthermore, it discusses the definition provided by the Appeals Chamber of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL). Accordingly, the paper calls on the significance of the definition provided by STL for the reason that the decision incorporated elements provided by various UN Resolutions and treaties, customary international law and domestic courts. Hence, the definition by STL should be taken as a universally agreeable one.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据国际法给恐怖主义下定义的问题:黎巴嫩问题特别法庭上诉分庭的定义作为该问题的解决办法
本文探讨了在国际法下对恐怖主义的法律定义的探索。本文采用理论研究的方法,对国际法律文书、习惯国际法以及国际法院的判决和学者的著作进行定性分析。在此过程中,本文首先讨论了根据国际法界定恐怖主义的困难。此外,本文将讨论学者和法律上对恐怖主义定义的主要尝试。在寻求法律定义方面,本文将探讨通过条约法定义恐怖主义的各种尝试及其空白。此外,它还讨论了黎巴嫩问题特别法庭上诉分庭提供的定义。因此,本文呼吁STL提供的定义的意义,因为该决定包含了各种联合国决议和条约、习惯国际法和国内法院提供的要素。因此,STL的定义应该被视为一个普遍接受的定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Use of Law in Wildlife Management The Incredible Shrinking Fourth Amendment —The Ongoing Erosion of the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America The Secretariat on Responsible Conduct of Research: Ethics Guardians or Keystone Cops? Research on the Development Direction of International Commercial Arbitration Network Institutionalizing Social Norms and Legal Culture: Social Dynamics under Legal Awareness Policy in Contemporary China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1