Tracing the Sociopolitical Reality of Race

S. Haslanger
{"title":"Tracing the Sociopolitical Reality of Race","authors":"S. Haslanger","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780190610173.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of race has a troublesome history. It has been used to divide societies and subordinate groups in unjust ways. It has also been a source of pride and strength for the subordinate (as well as, unfortunately, for the dominant). Historically it has also carried assumptions of naturalness: races are natural kinds that exist independent of human thought and activity. In recent years, however, the naturalness of race has been challenged and replaced with the idea that race is socially constructed. This raises many important philosophical questions: How should one inquire into the concept of race when there is such broad controversy over what race is? What are the relevant phenomena to be considered? How should such an inquiry take into account the social stakes (e.g. the potential impact of maintaining or rejecting the concept of race)? Is it possible for concepts to evolve, or is conceptual replacement the only option? In Chapter 1, the author takes up these methodological questions and positions herself as a critical theorist considering what role the concept of race has in the sociopolitical domain. She argues that there is a meaningful political conception of race that is important in order to address the history of racial injustice. This is compatible with there being different conceptions of race that are valuable in other contexts and for different purposes (e.g., for medical research, cultural empowerment).","PeriodicalId":202144,"journal":{"name":"What Is Race?","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"What Is Race?","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780190610173.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

The concept of race has a troublesome history. It has been used to divide societies and subordinate groups in unjust ways. It has also been a source of pride and strength for the subordinate (as well as, unfortunately, for the dominant). Historically it has also carried assumptions of naturalness: races are natural kinds that exist independent of human thought and activity. In recent years, however, the naturalness of race has been challenged and replaced with the idea that race is socially constructed. This raises many important philosophical questions: How should one inquire into the concept of race when there is such broad controversy over what race is? What are the relevant phenomena to be considered? How should such an inquiry take into account the social stakes (e.g. the potential impact of maintaining or rejecting the concept of race)? Is it possible for concepts to evolve, or is conceptual replacement the only option? In Chapter 1, the author takes up these methodological questions and positions herself as a critical theorist considering what role the concept of race has in the sociopolitical domain. She argues that there is a meaningful political conception of race that is important in order to address the history of racial injustice. This is compatible with there being different conceptions of race that are valuable in other contexts and for different purposes (e.g., for medical research, cultural empowerment).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
追踪种族的社会政治现实
种族的概念有一段麻烦的历史。它被用来以不公正的方式划分社会和从属群体。它也是下属的骄傲和力量的来源(不幸的是,也是统治者的骄傲和力量的来源)。从历史上看,它也带有自然性的假设:种族是独立于人类思想和活动而存在的自然种类。然而,近年来,种族的自然性受到了挑战,并被种族是社会建构的观点所取代。这就提出了许多重要的哲学问题:当种族是什么存在如此广泛的争议时,人们应该如何探究种族的概念?要考虑的相关现象是什么?这样的调查应该如何考虑社会利益(例如,维持或拒绝种族概念的潜在影响)?概念是否有可能进化,或者概念替代是唯一的选择?在第一章中,作者提出了这些方法论问题,并将自己定位为一个批判性理论家,考虑种族概念在社会政治领域中的作用。她认为,为了解决种族不公正的历史,有一个有意义的种族政治概念是很重要的。这与存在不同的种族概念是相容的,这些概念在其他情况下和为了不同的目的(例如,为了医学研究、文化赋权)是有价值的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Spencer’s Reply to Glasgow, Haslanger, and Jeffers Glasgow’s Reply to Haslanger, Jeffers, and Spencer How to Be a Biological Racial Realist Haslanger’s Reply to Glasgow, Jeffers, and Spencer Is Race an Illusion or a (Very) Basic Reality?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1