The Strength Of Evidence Of Deed Made Under Hands Connected With The Authority Of Notary Legalization And Waarmerking Based On Act No. 30 Of 2004 On The Notary Position

Jurnal Akta Pub Date : 2020-04-09 DOI:10.30659/AKTA.7.1.23
Muhammad Dias Saktiawan, G. Gunarto, Ngadino Ngadino
{"title":"The Strength Of Evidence Of Deed Made Under Hands Connected With The Authority Of Notary Legalization And Waarmerking Based On Act No. 30 Of 2004 On The Notary Position","authors":"Muhammad Dias Saktiawan, G. Gunarto, Ngadino Ngadino","doi":"10.30659/AKTA.7.1.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine the strength of the deed made under hand as evidence in court, and is there a function legalization and Waarmerking the deed made under hand can provide additional strength of evidence in court. Focused on the research objectives, the formulation of the problem is as follows: First, What is the function of the legalization and Waarmerking deed made under hand in evidence during the trial Court? Second, Do deed made under hand on legalization and in Waarmerking by notaries can be canceled by a judge in court?The research method used is the method of juridical-normative approach. Specifications in this research is descriptive analytical. The data collection method used in this research is secondary data in the form of primary legal materials that legislation, secondary law namely literature, scientific papers, and tertiary legal materials namely legal materials that support primary legal materials and secondary law. While the methods of data analysis using qualitative data analysis.The results showed Legalization and Waarmerking function on deed made under the hand give assurance to the judge about the date, signature, identity of the parties to the agreement, thus helping to judge in terms of proof. Deed made under hand on Legalization and in Waarmerking by notary can be canceled by a judge even though the task of the judge in the case only to share the burden of proof to prove, but ex officio judge can not cancel a deed if not requested cancellation. This is because judges are not allowed to decide unsolicited, so as a deed can be canceled if it does not meet the elements of subjective and objective elements.Keywords: Legalization; Deed; Notary.","PeriodicalId":190203,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Akta","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Akta","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30659/AKTA.7.1.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to determine the strength of the deed made under hand as evidence in court, and is there a function legalization and Waarmerking the deed made under hand can provide additional strength of evidence in court. Focused on the research objectives, the formulation of the problem is as follows: First, What is the function of the legalization and Waarmerking deed made under hand in evidence during the trial Court? Second, Do deed made under hand on legalization and in Waarmerking by notaries can be canceled by a judge in court?The research method used is the method of juridical-normative approach. Specifications in this research is descriptive analytical. The data collection method used in this research is secondary data in the form of primary legal materials that legislation, secondary law namely literature, scientific papers, and tertiary legal materials namely legal materials that support primary legal materials and secondary law. While the methods of data analysis using qualitative data analysis.The results showed Legalization and Waarmerking function on deed made under the hand give assurance to the judge about the date, signature, identity of the parties to the agreement, thus helping to judge in terms of proof. Deed made under hand on Legalization and in Waarmerking by notary can be canceled by a judge even though the task of the judge in the case only to share the burden of proof to prove, but ex officio judge can not cancel a deed if not requested cancellation. This is because judges are not allowed to decide unsolicited, so as a deed can be canceled if it does not meet the elements of subjective and objective elements.Keywords: Legalization; Deed; Notary.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于2004年《公证法》第30号关于公证职位的规定,论与公证权合法化有关的契据证据的效力与争议
本研究旨在确定契约作为法庭证据的力度,以及契约的合法化和标记是否有功能可以提供额外的法庭证据力度。围绕研究目标,问题的提法如下:第一,在审判过程中,在证据下作出的合法化和证明的作用是什么?第二,公证人在公证过程中亲手制作的契约可以在法庭上被法官撤销吗?本文采用的研究方法是司法-规范方法。本研究的规范是描述性分析性的。本研究使用的数据收集方法是二级数据,其形式为一级法律资料即立法,二级法律资料即文献,科学论文,三级法律资料即支持一级法律资料和二级法律的法律资料。而数据分析的方法则采用定性数据分析。结果表明,契约的法制化和Waarmerking功能使法官对契约的签订日期、签名、当事人身份等有了一定的把握,有利于举证方面的判断。尽管法官在案件中的任务只是分担举证责任,但在法律认可和公证的情况下所做的契约可以由法官撤销,但如果没有请求撤销,依职权法官不能撤销契约。这是因为法官不允许自行决定,因此如果不符合主观和客观要素,契约就可以被取消。关键词:合法化;行为;公证人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Re-Narrate the Relevance of Justice in Debtor Protection Related to the Parate Execution Carried Out by Separatist Creditors The Predatory Pricing Practice: The Challenges of Business Competition Law on Ride-Hailing Tariff’s War The Legal Implications of Forgery Sale & Purchase Binding Agreement by Notary Public The Implementation of Legal Position Regulation of Head of Services/Agency in Local Government The Implementation of a Complete Systematic Land Registration Program to Realize Legal Protection and Public Welfare
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1