Impact of Agricultural Communication Interventions on Improving Agricultural Productivity in Malawi

Fallys Masambuka-Kanchewa, Mary T. Rodriguez, Emily B. Buck, Jera Niewoehner-Green, A. Lamm
{"title":"Impact of Agricultural Communication Interventions on Improving Agricultural\nProductivity in Malawi","authors":"Fallys Masambuka-Kanchewa, Mary T. Rodriguez, Emily B. Buck, Jera Niewoehner-Green, A. Lamm","doi":"10.5191/jiaee.2020.273116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Agricultural communication (AGCOM) has been known to aid in disseminating research-based agricultural information among Malawian farmers. In 1958 the Malawi Government, via the Ministry of Agriculture, established the Agricultural Communications Branch (ACB) in an attempt to increase access to and adoption of scientifically-proven technologies among farmers. Moreover, in 2000 the Malawi Government started implementing an agricultural extension policy that promoted pluralistic demand-driven extension, which led to the increased availability of non-governmental organizations providing AGCOM services to farmers. However, after several decades of using different communication tools to promote new technologies, low productivity in most small holder farms remains a challenge, with limited adoption of improved technology as one of the contributing factors. In this exploratory, convergent, mixed methods study, 30 Malawian farmers and six AGCOM officers who were selected using convenient and snow ball sampling respectively participated in key informant interviews. In addition, 64 AGCOM officers who were selected using simple random sampling were involved in a survey. The findings of the study revealed that information delivered to farmers does not address farmer needs in most cases. Specifically, existing policies, source and availability of funding, and the agricultural calendar influenced choice of information that was disseminated. For example, the existing policy does not allow AGCOM officers to disseminate local and innovative farmer practices unless they are tested and approved by scientists. Such policies, perpetuates a mindset among farmers that innovations originate from outside their communities, thereby making it hard for them to share their local, indigenous ideas with their colleagues. Moreover, it has contributed to the inability of AGCOM to be used as an innovation creation tool, hence AGCOMs’ limited impact. \n\nKeywords: adoption, improved technologies, agricultural communication, increased productivity, information dissemination","PeriodicalId":133020,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5191/jiaee.2020.273116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Agricultural communication (AGCOM) has been known to aid in disseminating research-based agricultural information among Malawian farmers. In 1958 the Malawi Government, via the Ministry of Agriculture, established the Agricultural Communications Branch (ACB) in an attempt to increase access to and adoption of scientifically-proven technologies among farmers. Moreover, in 2000 the Malawi Government started implementing an agricultural extension policy that promoted pluralistic demand-driven extension, which led to the increased availability of non-governmental organizations providing AGCOM services to farmers. However, after several decades of using different communication tools to promote new technologies, low productivity in most small holder farms remains a challenge, with limited adoption of improved technology as one of the contributing factors. In this exploratory, convergent, mixed methods study, 30 Malawian farmers and six AGCOM officers who were selected using convenient and snow ball sampling respectively participated in key informant interviews. In addition, 64 AGCOM officers who were selected using simple random sampling were involved in a survey. The findings of the study revealed that information delivered to farmers does not address farmer needs in most cases. Specifically, existing policies, source and availability of funding, and the agricultural calendar influenced choice of information that was disseminated. For example, the existing policy does not allow AGCOM officers to disseminate local and innovative farmer practices unless they are tested and approved by scientists. Such policies, perpetuates a mindset among farmers that innovations originate from outside their communities, thereby making it hard for them to share their local, indigenous ideas with their colleagues. Moreover, it has contributed to the inability of AGCOM to be used as an innovation creation tool, hence AGCOMs’ limited impact. Keywords: adoption, improved technologies, agricultural communication, increased productivity, information dissemination
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农业传播干预对提高马拉维农业生产力的影响
众所周知,农业通讯有助于在马拉维农民中传播基于研究的农业信息。1958年,马拉维政府通过农业部设立了农业通讯处(ACB),试图增加农民获得和采用经科学证明的技术的机会。此外,2000年,马拉维政府开始实施一项农业推广政策,促进以需求为导向的多元化推广,从而增加了向农民提供AGCOM服务的非政府组织的可用性。然而,在使用不同的通信工具促进新技术几十年后,大多数小农场的生产力低下仍然是一个挑战,改进技术的采用有限是造成这种情况的因素之一。在这项探索性、收敛性、混合性的研究中,30名马拉维农民和6名AGCOM官员分别采用方便抽样和雪球抽样的方法参加了关键线人访谈。此外,采用简单随机抽样方法选出的64名AGCOM官员参与了调查。研究结果表明,在大多数情况下,向农民提供的信息并没有满足农民的需求。具体而言,现有政策、资金来源和可用性以及农业日历影响了所传播信息的选择。例如,现有的政策不允许AGCOM官员传播当地和创新的农民实践,除非它们得到科学家的测试和批准。这样的政策使得农民们认为创新来源于他们的社区之外,从而使他们很难与他们的同事分享他们当地的、本土的想法。此外,它还导致AGCOM无法被用作创新创造工具,因此AGCOM的影响有限。关键词:采用,改进技术,农业传播,提高生产力,信息传播
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Examination of Ugandan Educators’ Cultural Preferences when Teaching Agriculture: A Q Methodological Study Perceptions of Professionals, Faculty, and Students Regarding the Implementation of an Agricultural Communications Degree Program in the United Kingdom Fighting Alone: The Lived Experiences of African Women Immigrant Farmers Acquiring Land in the U.S. 4-H Senegal Community of Practice Developing STEM Curricula that Leads to Youth-driven Discovery and Innovation Students’ Acquisition of Agricultural and Entrepreneurship (Agripreneurship) Knowledge and Skills: Does Instructional Approach and their Sex Matter?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1