Concurrent task interference in stutterers: dissociating hemispheric specialization and activation.

D C Forster, W G Webster
{"title":"Concurrent task interference in stutterers: dissociating hemispheric specialization and activation.","authors":"D C Forster,&nbsp;W G Webster","doi":"10.1037/h0084300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Using all four combinations of hand and foot, adult stutterers and nonstutterers performed a unimanual sequential finger tapping task together with a stimulus-contingent foot responding task. The two groups were similar in that both demonstrated more dual-task interference when using the ipsilateral than contralateral limb pairs. Contrary to a prediction based on a hypothesis that attributes stuttering to neural interference due to an ungated or unregulated activity flow between the hemispheres, stutterers did not show more interference than nonstutterers when using the contralateral limb pairs. The groups did differ, however, in terms of finger tapping interference associated with right- versus left-foot concurrent task responding. Nonstutterers showed more interference when using the left than right foot. This was interpreted in terms of the attentional demands that the foot responding task placed on a system with an inherent left-hemisphere attentional bias. The lack of a reliable difference in stutterers with respect to interference by the two feet is consistent with indications from other research that stutterers have a relatively labile system of hemispheric attention or activation. The results of the study are placed into the context of a general model of the brain mechanisms associated with stuttering.</p>","PeriodicalId":75671,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of psychology","volume":"45 3","pages":"321-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1037/h0084300","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/h0084300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Using all four combinations of hand and foot, adult stutterers and nonstutterers performed a unimanual sequential finger tapping task together with a stimulus-contingent foot responding task. The two groups were similar in that both demonstrated more dual-task interference when using the ipsilateral than contralateral limb pairs. Contrary to a prediction based on a hypothesis that attributes stuttering to neural interference due to an ungated or unregulated activity flow between the hemispheres, stutterers did not show more interference than nonstutterers when using the contralateral limb pairs. The groups did differ, however, in terms of finger tapping interference associated with right- versus left-foot concurrent task responding. Nonstutterers showed more interference when using the left than right foot. This was interpreted in terms of the attentional demands that the foot responding task placed on a system with an inherent left-hemisphere attentional bias. The lack of a reliable difference in stutterers with respect to interference by the two feet is consistent with indications from other research that stutterers have a relatively labile system of hemispheric attention or activation. The results of the study are placed into the context of a general model of the brain mechanisms associated with stuttering.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
口吃者并发任务干扰:分离半球特化和激活。
使用所有四种手和脚的组合,成年口吃者和非口吃者一起执行一个单手顺序手指敲击任务和一个刺激-偶然的足反应任务。两组的相似之处在于,当使用同侧肢体时,两组都表现出比对侧肢体更多的双任务干扰。与基于假设的预测相反,当使用对侧肢体对时,口吃者并不比非口吃者表现出更多的干扰,该假设将口吃归因于两脑半球之间不受限制或不受调节的活动流造成的神经干扰。然而,在手指敲击与右脚和左脚并发任务反应相关的干扰方面,两组确实有所不同。非口吃者在使用左脚时比使用右脚时表现出更多的干扰。这被解释为足部反应任务对具有固有左半球注意偏向的系统的注意要求。口吃者在两脚干扰方面缺乏可靠的差异,这与其他研究的迹象一致,即口吃者有一个相对不稳定的半球注意或激活系统。这项研究的结果被置于与口吃有关的大脑机制的一般模型的背景下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
La langue et les Lèvres: cross-language influences on bimodal speech perception. Neural and behavioural effects of domoic acid, an amnesic shellfish toxin, in the rat. Object identification in context: the visual processing of natural scenes. Eye movements and scene perception. Parallel pattern processing and visual agnosia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1