A Detailed Comparison of Probabilistic Approaches for Coping with Unfair Ratings in Trust and Reputation Systems

Jie Zhang, M. Sensoy, R. Cohen
{"title":"A Detailed Comparison of Probabilistic Approaches for Coping with Unfair Ratings in Trust and Reputation Systems","authors":"Jie Zhang, M. Sensoy, R. Cohen","doi":"10.1109/PST.2008.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The unfair rating problem exists when a buying agent models the trustworthiness of selling agents by also relying on ratings of the sellers from other buyers. Different probabilistic approaches have been proposed to cope with this issue. In this paper, we first summarize these approaches and provide a detailed categorization of them. This includes our own \"personalized\" approach for addressing this problem. Based on the implication of such analysis, we then focus on experimental comparison of our approach with two key models in a framework that simulates a dynamic electronic marketplace environment. We specifically examine different scenarios, including ones where the majority of buyers are dishonest, buyers lack personal experience with sellers, sellers may vary their behavior, and buyers may provide a large number of ratings. Our study provides the basis for deciding which approach is most appropriate to employ, in which scenario.","PeriodicalId":422934,"journal":{"name":"2008 Sixth Annual Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 Sixth Annual Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PST.2008.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

The unfair rating problem exists when a buying agent models the trustworthiness of selling agents by also relying on ratings of the sellers from other buyers. Different probabilistic approaches have been proposed to cope with this issue. In this paper, we first summarize these approaches and provide a detailed categorization of them. This includes our own "personalized" approach for addressing this problem. Based on the implication of such analysis, we then focus on experimental comparison of our approach with two key models in a framework that simulates a dynamic electronic marketplace environment. We specifically examine different scenarios, including ones where the majority of buyers are dishonest, buyers lack personal experience with sellers, sellers may vary their behavior, and buyers may provide a large number of ratings. Our study provides the basis for deciding which approach is most appropriate to employ, in which scenario.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在信任和声誉系统中处理不公平评级的概率方法的详细比较
当购买代理通过依赖其他买家对卖家的评级来模拟销售代理的可信度时,不公平评级问题就存在了。已经提出了不同的概率方法来处理这个问题。在本文中,我们首先总结了这些方法,并对它们进行了详细的分类。这包括我们自己的“个性化”方法来解决这个问题。基于这种分析的含义,然后我们将重点放在我们的方法与模拟动态电子市场环境的框架中的两个关键模型的实验比较上。我们专门研究了不同的场景,包括大多数买家不诚实,买家缺乏与卖家的个人经验,卖家可能会改变他们的行为,买家可能会提供大量的评级。我们的研究为决定哪种方法在哪种情况下最适合使用提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Incorporating Privacy Outcomes: Teaching an Old Dog New Tricks LogView: Visualizing Event Log Clusters Unlinkable Communication The Uncertainty of the Truth Model-Checking for Software Vulnerabilities Detection with Multi-Language Support
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1