Did Muscovite Literary Ideology Place Limits on the Power of the Tsar (1540s–1660s)?

D. Rowland
{"title":"Did Muscovite Literary Ideology Place Limits on the Power of the Tsar (1540s–1660s)?","authors":"D. Rowland","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501752094.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter talks about Richard Pipes' publication of a sweeping and influential reinterpretation of pre-Soviet Russian political culture. It analyses Pipes' central idea that Muscovite Rus´ was a patrimonial state and the tsar or great prince exercised power that is comparable to that of the possessor of dominium in Roman law. It also details how Pipes traced the growth of the actual power of the monarch and the gradual narrowing of the boundaries of possible action for all classes. The chapter explains why no class or social group was able to limit the excessive growth of royal power. It discusses the ideology of royal absolutism in Russia that was worked out by clergymen who felt that the interests of religion and church were best served by a monarchy with no limits to its power.","PeriodicalId":102765,"journal":{"name":"God, Tsar, and People","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"God, Tsar, and People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501752094.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter talks about Richard Pipes' publication of a sweeping and influential reinterpretation of pre-Soviet Russian political culture. It analyses Pipes' central idea that Muscovite Rus´ was a patrimonial state and the tsar or great prince exercised power that is comparable to that of the possessor of dominium in Roman law. It also details how Pipes traced the growth of the actual power of the monarch and the gradual narrowing of the boundaries of possible action for all classes. The chapter explains why no class or social group was able to limit the excessive growth of royal power. It discusses the ideology of royal absolutism in Russia that was worked out by clergymen who felt that the interests of religion and church were best served by a monarchy with no limits to its power.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
莫斯科文学意识形态是否限制了沙皇的权力(1540 - 1660年代)?
本章讨论理查德·派普斯对苏联前俄罗斯政治文化的全面而有影响力的重新解释。它分析了派普斯的中心思想,即莫斯科罗斯是一个世袭国家,沙皇或大公行使的权力与罗马法中的统治权所有者相当。它还详细描述了派普斯如何追溯君主实际权力的增长以及所有阶级可能采取行动的界限逐渐缩小。这一章解释了为什么没有一个阶级或社会团体能够限制皇权的过度增长。书中讨论了俄国皇室专制主义的意识形态,这种意识形态是由神职人员提出的,他们认为宗教和教会的利益最好由一个权力不受限制的君主制来服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Problem of Advice in Muscovite Tales about the Time of Troubles Biblical Military Imagery in the Political Culture of Early Modern Russia Autocracy Muscovy Moscow—The Third Rome or the New Israel?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1