{"title":"Estimation of Change Points in Stationary and Nonstationary Regressors and Error Term","authors":"C. Kao, Long Liu","doi":"10.1142/9789811200168_0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Testing and estimation of change points have been widely studied in econometrics. The focus of this chapter is to test and estimate for possible changes in the slope parameter of panel regression models. In Sec. 3.1, we discuss the spurious break in time-series. It is known that there is a tendency to spuriously estimate a break point in the middle of the sample when the errors follow an I(1) process, even though a break point does not actually exist, e.g., Bai (1998). In Sec. 3.2, we discuss estimation of a change point when it does not exist. Baltagi, Kao, and Liu (2017) consider the spurious break in a panel data regression model where the error terms are either stationary or nonstationary. Here the spurious break may still exist even with large panels. As a solution, an FD estimator is proposed. In Sec. 3.3, we discuss spurious break when a change point exists. The results in Bai (1997) for the time-series, Feng, Kao, and Lazarova (2009) for a homogeneous panel data model, and Baltagi, Feng, and Kao (2016) for a heterogeneous panel data model are discussed and compared. In Sec. 3.4, we further discuss a few extensions. We discuss change point estimation in a trend model, a model with a stationary or nonstationary regressor and/or error term, and a model with common factors. Sec. 3.5 compares OLS and FGLS-based Wald-tests in Emerson and Kao (2001) and Baltagi, Kao, and Liu (2019). Sec. 3.6 concludes.","PeriodicalId":254454,"journal":{"name":"High-Dimensional Econometrics and Identification","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"High-Dimensional Econometrics and Identification","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811200168_0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Testing and estimation of change points have been widely studied in econometrics. The focus of this chapter is to test and estimate for possible changes in the slope parameter of panel regression models. In Sec. 3.1, we discuss the spurious break in time-series. It is known that there is a tendency to spuriously estimate a break point in the middle of the sample when the errors follow an I(1) process, even though a break point does not actually exist, e.g., Bai (1998). In Sec. 3.2, we discuss estimation of a change point when it does not exist. Baltagi, Kao, and Liu (2017) consider the spurious break in a panel data regression model where the error terms are either stationary or nonstationary. Here the spurious break may still exist even with large panels. As a solution, an FD estimator is proposed. In Sec. 3.3, we discuss spurious break when a change point exists. The results in Bai (1997) for the time-series, Feng, Kao, and Lazarova (2009) for a homogeneous panel data model, and Baltagi, Feng, and Kao (2016) for a heterogeneous panel data model are discussed and compared. In Sec. 3.4, we further discuss a few extensions. We discuss change point estimation in a trend model, a model with a stationary or nonstationary regressor and/or error term, and a model with common factors. Sec. 3.5 compares OLS and FGLS-based Wald-tests in Emerson and Kao (2001) and Baltagi, Kao, and Liu (2019). Sec. 3.6 concludes.
变化点的检验和估计是计量经济学中广泛研究的问题。本章的重点是检验和估计面板回归模型的斜率参数可能发生的变化。在第3.1节中,我们将讨论时间序列中的伪中断。众所周知,当误差遵循I(1)过程时,即使断点实际上并不存在,也存在虚假地估计样本中间断点的倾向,例如Bai(1998)。在第3.2节中,我们讨论了变化点不存在时的估计。Baltagi, Kao和Liu(2017)考虑了误差项为平稳或非平稳的面板数据回归模型中的虚假中断。在这里,即使是大型面板,虚假的断裂也可能仍然存在。作为解决方案,提出了一个FD估计器。在第3.3节中,我们讨论了存在变化点时的伪中断。本文讨论并比较了Bai(1997)对时间序列的研究结果,Feng, Kao, and Lazarova(2009)对同质面板数据模型的研究结果,以及Baltagi, Feng, and Kao(2016)对异质面板数据模型的研究结果。在第3.4节中,我们将进一步讨论一些扩展。我们讨论了趋势模型、具有平稳或非平稳回归量和/或误差项的模型以及具有共同因子的模型中的变化点估计。第3.5节比较了Emerson and Kao(2001)和Baltagi, Kao, and Liu(2019)基于OLS和fgls的wald测试。第3.6节结束。