Estimation of Change Points in Stationary and Nonstationary Regressors and Error Term

C. Kao, Long Liu
{"title":"Estimation of Change Points in Stationary and Nonstationary Regressors and Error Term","authors":"C. Kao, Long Liu","doi":"10.1142/9789811200168_0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Testing and estimation of change points have been widely studied in econometrics. The focus of this chapter is to test and estimate for possible changes in the slope parameter of panel regression models. In Sec. 3.1, we discuss the spurious break in time-series. It is known that there is a tendency to spuriously estimate a break point in the middle of the sample when the errors follow an I(1) process, even though a break point does not actually exist, e.g., Bai (1998). In Sec. 3.2, we discuss estimation of a change point when it does not exist. Baltagi, Kao, and Liu (2017) consider the spurious break in a panel data regression model where the error terms are either stationary or nonstationary. Here the spurious break may still exist even with large panels. As a solution, an FD estimator is proposed. In Sec. 3.3, we discuss spurious break when a change point exists. The results in Bai (1997) for the time-series, Feng, Kao, and Lazarova (2009) for a homogeneous panel data model, and Baltagi, Feng, and Kao (2016) for a heterogeneous panel data model are discussed and compared. In Sec. 3.4, we further discuss a few extensions. We discuss change point estimation in a trend model, a model with a stationary or nonstationary regressor and/or error term, and a model with common factors. Sec. 3.5 compares OLS and FGLS-based Wald-tests in Emerson and Kao (2001) and Baltagi, Kao, and Liu (2019). Sec. 3.6 concludes.","PeriodicalId":254454,"journal":{"name":"High-Dimensional Econometrics and Identification","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"High-Dimensional Econometrics and Identification","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811200168_0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Testing and estimation of change points have been widely studied in econometrics. The focus of this chapter is to test and estimate for possible changes in the slope parameter of panel regression models. In Sec. 3.1, we discuss the spurious break in time-series. It is known that there is a tendency to spuriously estimate a break point in the middle of the sample when the errors follow an I(1) process, even though a break point does not actually exist, e.g., Bai (1998). In Sec. 3.2, we discuss estimation of a change point when it does not exist. Baltagi, Kao, and Liu (2017) consider the spurious break in a panel data regression model where the error terms are either stationary or nonstationary. Here the spurious break may still exist even with large panels. As a solution, an FD estimator is proposed. In Sec. 3.3, we discuss spurious break when a change point exists. The results in Bai (1997) for the time-series, Feng, Kao, and Lazarova (2009) for a homogeneous panel data model, and Baltagi, Feng, and Kao (2016) for a heterogeneous panel data model are discussed and compared. In Sec. 3.4, we further discuss a few extensions. We discuss change point estimation in a trend model, a model with a stationary or nonstationary regressor and/or error term, and a model with common factors. Sec. 3.5 compares OLS and FGLS-based Wald-tests in Emerson and Kao (2001) and Baltagi, Kao, and Liu (2019). Sec. 3.6 concludes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
平稳和非平稳回归量变化点的估计及误差项
变化点的检验和估计是计量经济学中广泛研究的问题。本章的重点是检验和估计面板回归模型的斜率参数可能发生的变化。在第3.1节中,我们将讨论时间序列中的伪中断。众所周知,当误差遵循I(1)过程时,即使断点实际上并不存在,也存在虚假地估计样本中间断点的倾向,例如Bai(1998)。在第3.2节中,我们讨论了变化点不存在时的估计。Baltagi, Kao和Liu(2017)考虑了误差项为平稳或非平稳的面板数据回归模型中的虚假中断。在这里,即使是大型面板,虚假的断裂也可能仍然存在。作为解决方案,提出了一个FD估计器。在第3.3节中,我们讨论了存在变化点时的伪中断。本文讨论并比较了Bai(1997)对时间序列的研究结果,Feng, Kao, and Lazarova(2009)对同质面板数据模型的研究结果,以及Baltagi, Feng, and Kao(2016)对异质面板数据模型的研究结果。在第3.4节中,我们将进一步讨论一些扩展。我们讨论了趋势模型、具有平稳或非平稳回归量和/或误差项的模型以及具有共同因子的模型中的变化点估计。第3.5节比较了Emerson and Kao(2001)和Baltagi, Kao, and Liu(2019)基于OLS和fgls的wald测试。第3.6节结束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Panel Data Model with Stationary and Nonstationary Regressors and Error Terms Panel Time Trend Model with Stationary and Nonstationary Error Terms Incidental Parameters Problem in Panel Data Models BACK MATTER FRONT MATTER
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1