Wikirate: a claims-based system for collaboratively reviewing corporate behaviour

Vishal Kapadia, Ethan McCutchen, Lucia Lu, Philipp Kühl
{"title":"Wikirate: a claims-based system for collaboratively reviewing corporate behaviour","authors":"Vishal Kapadia, Ethan McCutchen, Lucia Lu, Philipp Kühl","doi":"10.1145/2641580.2641635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wikirate.org is a community effort to review and rate companies' ethical behavior. Wikirate.org is built using Wagn, whose atomic data approach allows Wikirate contributors to integrate rich qualitative and quantitative data in innovative, accessible ways. In the qualitative realm, data can be browsed by Company or by Topic, and the site's core Articles cover the intersection of the two (eg. BP+Climate Change). Because source data in the corporate transparency realm in notoriously biased, Wikirate enhances traditional wiki mechanisms for ensuring data quality patterns by organizing Articles around citation of granular Claims, supporting discussion of and voting on these Claims, and requiring that Claims cite Sources. This organization also serves to help break down the sizable task of reviewing corporate behavior into very manageable chunks. In the quantitative realm, Wikirate will soon be introducing a Ratings system that enables participants to create both simple and formulaic metrics and allows the community to vote on the most valuable of these. The system is designed such that all metrics are created and controlled by the community, and their votes determine both the metrics' prominence on the site and the companies' transparency score.","PeriodicalId":447989,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of The International Symposium on Open Collaboration","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of The International Symposium on Open Collaboration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2641580.2641635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wikirate.org is a community effort to review and rate companies' ethical behavior. Wikirate.org is built using Wagn, whose atomic data approach allows Wikirate contributors to integrate rich qualitative and quantitative data in innovative, accessible ways. In the qualitative realm, data can be browsed by Company or by Topic, and the site's core Articles cover the intersection of the two (eg. BP+Climate Change). Because source data in the corporate transparency realm in notoriously biased, Wikirate enhances traditional wiki mechanisms for ensuring data quality patterns by organizing Articles around citation of granular Claims, supporting discussion of and voting on these Claims, and requiring that Claims cite Sources. This organization also serves to help break down the sizable task of reviewing corporate behavior into very manageable chunks. In the quantitative realm, Wikirate will soon be introducing a Ratings system that enables participants to create both simple and formulaic metrics and allows the community to vote on the most valuable of these. The system is designed such that all metrics are created and controlled by the community, and their votes determine both the metrics' prominence on the site and the companies' transparency score.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Wikirate:一个基于索赔的系统,用于协作审查企业行为
org是一个社区致力于审查和评价公司的道德行为。Wikirate.org是使用Wagn建立的,他的原子数据方法允许Wikirate贡献者以创新的、可访问的方式集成丰富的定性和定量数据。在定性领域,数据可以按公司或按主题浏览,该网站的核心文章涵盖了两者的交叉点(例如。英国石油(BP) +气候变化)。由于企业透明度领域中的源数据是有偏见的,因此Wikirate增强了传统的wiki机制,通过围绕引用细粒度声明来组织文章,支持对这些声明的讨论和投票,并要求声明引用源,从而确保数据质量模式。这种组织还有助于将审查公司行为的大任务分解为易于管理的小块。在量化领域,Wikirate将很快引入一个评分系统,使参与者能够创建简单和公式化的指标,并允许社区对其中最有价值的指标进行投票。该系统的设计是这样的,所有的指标都是由社区创建和控制的,他们的投票决定了这些指标在网站上的突出程度和公司的透明度得分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contropedia - the analysis and visualization of controversies in Wikipedia articles Supporting awareness of content-related controversies in a Wiki-based learning environment What do Chinese-language microblog users do with Baidu Baike and Chinese Wikipedia? A case study of information engagement Chinese-language literature about Wikipedia: a meta-analysis of academic search engine result pages Volunteer Attraction and Retention in Open Source Communities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1