{"title":"The Future of Freedom","authors":"G. Little","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3875980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The nature of society begins with citizen fundamental moral choice determining the jurisprudence adopted and applied in society: Is necessary social discipline to be imposed, or is all law to draw forth citizen self-discipline, asserting the rights of the individual asserted over those of the state? The former a compliant society, assertion of group rights over individual rights; the latter, defined as a free society, assertion of individual rights over group rights. Humans create ideas then apply them in managing circumstance, with intensity of action derived from the associated emotions. Having made the fundamental moral choice, the society architecture must be built with ideas congruent with that choice combined with workable compromise, the ethic for peaceful co-existence. Social development in free democratic societies begins in the middle with appropriate governance offering balanced, accurate, reasoned ideas to citizens. Citizens choose, within social architecture designed to enable self-discipline. Government then becomes government by following citizen thinking. To begin to secure the future of freedom, media must be required to offer balanced views, never opinion. And academe must dismiss peer review as the standard of intellectual quality, replacing it with strategic science","PeriodicalId":129815,"journal":{"name":"Microeconomics: Welfare Economics & Collective Decision-Making eJournal","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microeconomics: Welfare Economics & Collective Decision-Making eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3875980","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The nature of society begins with citizen fundamental moral choice determining the jurisprudence adopted and applied in society: Is necessary social discipline to be imposed, or is all law to draw forth citizen self-discipline, asserting the rights of the individual asserted over those of the state? The former a compliant society, assertion of group rights over individual rights; the latter, defined as a free society, assertion of individual rights over group rights. Humans create ideas then apply them in managing circumstance, with intensity of action derived from the associated emotions. Having made the fundamental moral choice, the society architecture must be built with ideas congruent with that choice combined with workable compromise, the ethic for peaceful co-existence. Social development in free democratic societies begins in the middle with appropriate governance offering balanced, accurate, reasoned ideas to citizens. Citizens choose, within social architecture designed to enable self-discipline. Government then becomes government by following citizen thinking. To begin to secure the future of freedom, media must be required to offer balanced views, never opinion. And academe must dismiss peer review as the standard of intellectual quality, replacing it with strategic science
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自由的未来
社会的本质始于公民的基本道德选择,它决定了在社会中采用和应用的法理:是强加必要的社会纪律,还是所有的法律都是为了引出公民的自律,主张个人的权利高于国家的权利?前者是一个顺从的社会,主张群体权利高于个人权利;后者被定义为自由社会,主张个人权利高于群体权利。人类创造想法,然后将其应用于管理环境,并从相关情绪中获得行动的强度。在作出了基本的道德选择之后,社会结构必须建立在与这一选择相一致的思想以及可行的妥协、和平共处的伦理之上。自由民主社会的社会发展始于适当的治理,为公民提供平衡、准确、理性的想法。公民在旨在实现自律的社会架构中进行选择。政府通过遵循公民的思维而成为政府。为了确保自由的未来,必须要求媒体提供平衡的观点,而不是意见。学术界必须摒弃同行评议作为智力质量的标准,代之以战略科学
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Opportunity and Inequality Across Generations Auctioning Corporate Bonds: A Uniform-Price under Investment Mandates The Role of Effort Cost Perception in Outcome Bias (Mis-)Perception of Inequality: Measures, Determinants, and Consequences Dynamic Resource Allocation with Cost Externality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1