The Effect of Collaborative Relationship between Medical Doctors and Engineers on the Productivity of Developing Medical Devices

Tatsuro Yoda
{"title":"The Effect of Collaborative Relationship between Medical Doctors and Engineers on the Productivity of Developing Medical Devices","authors":"Tatsuro Yoda","doi":"10.1111/radm.12131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous research on medical devices research and development (R&D) paid close attention to the role of medical doctors as users of medical devices, but they did not examine enough the interdisciplinary collaboration between medical doctors and engineers as a team of developing a medical device. In this paper, I looked at the effect of collaborative relationship between medical doctors and engineers on the productivity of the development based on interviews on R&D of artificial retina and bibliometric analysis on R&D of cochlear implant. In the interviews with medical doctors and engineers involved in R&D of artificial retina in the United States, Germany, and Japan, we found that medical doctors and engineers perceive that the collaboration is one of the key factors to the success in inventing and developing medical devices, but that the good collaborative relationship is difficult to maintain. Next we examined such collaboration quantitatively by conducting bibliometric analysis of research articles and patents related to the development of cochlear implant, and found the important role played by medical doctors and their collaboration with engineers when designing and improving the medical device, and that more collaboration between medical doctors and engineers is seen in the more productive R&D group. Considering those findings, development of a medical device needs not only the ‘user‐led’ forces of medical doctors but also close interdisciplinary collaboration between medical doctors and engineers as a team. For such collaborative team effort to succeed, absorptive capacity of both sides and proximity between them are important, while there are barriers between a medical doctor and an engineer including cognitive, organizational, social, and institutional factors. To overcome those barriers, experiences of cooperation, education, geographic proximity, good leadership, or member's personality can promote some elements of proximity to compensate for lack or shortage of other elements of proximity.","PeriodicalId":320323,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: Research (Sub-Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERPN: Research (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Previous research on medical devices research and development (R&D) paid close attention to the role of medical doctors as users of medical devices, but they did not examine enough the interdisciplinary collaboration between medical doctors and engineers as a team of developing a medical device. In this paper, I looked at the effect of collaborative relationship between medical doctors and engineers on the productivity of the development based on interviews on R&D of artificial retina and bibliometric analysis on R&D of cochlear implant. In the interviews with medical doctors and engineers involved in R&D of artificial retina in the United States, Germany, and Japan, we found that medical doctors and engineers perceive that the collaboration is one of the key factors to the success in inventing and developing medical devices, but that the good collaborative relationship is difficult to maintain. Next we examined such collaboration quantitatively by conducting bibliometric analysis of research articles and patents related to the development of cochlear implant, and found the important role played by medical doctors and their collaboration with engineers when designing and improving the medical device, and that more collaboration between medical doctors and engineers is seen in the more productive R&D group. Considering those findings, development of a medical device needs not only the ‘user‐led’ forces of medical doctors but also close interdisciplinary collaboration between medical doctors and engineers as a team. For such collaborative team effort to succeed, absorptive capacity of both sides and proximity between them are important, while there are barriers between a medical doctor and an engineer including cognitive, organizational, social, and institutional factors. To overcome those barriers, experiences of cooperation, education, geographic proximity, good leadership, or member's personality can promote some elements of proximity to compensate for lack or shortage of other elements of proximity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医生与工程师合作关系对医疗器械开发生产力的影响
以往的医疗器械研究与开发(R&D)关注的是医生作为医疗器械使用者的角色,但对医生与工程师作为一个医疗器械开发团队的跨学科合作研究不够。本文通过对人工视网膜研发的访谈和人工耳蜗研发的文献计量学分析,考察了医生和工程师之间的协作关系对研发生产力的影响。在对美国、德国和日本参与人工视网膜研发的医生和工程师的访谈中,我们发现医生和工程师认为合作是医疗器械发明和开发成功的关键因素之一,但良好的合作关系很难维持。接下来,我们通过对与人工耳蜗开发相关的研究论文和专利进行文献计量分析,定量地考察了这种合作,发现医生和他们与工程师在设计和改进医疗设备时的合作发挥了重要作用,并且在更富有成效的研发小组中,医生和工程师之间的合作更多。考虑到这些发现,医疗设备的开发不仅需要医生的“用户主导”力量,还需要医生和工程师作为一个团队进行密切的跨学科合作。这种协作团队的努力要取得成功,双方的吸收能力和他们之间的接近是重要的,而医生和工程师之间存在着包括认知、组织、社会和制度因素在内的障碍。为了克服这些障碍,合作经验、教育、地理上的接近、良好的领导或成员的个性可以促进一些接近因素,以弥补其他接近因素的缺乏或不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Can Environmental Policy Encourage Technical Change? Emissions Taxes and R&D Investment in Polluting Firms Three Decades of Research on Corporate Governance and R&D Investments: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda The Risk of Caution: Evidence from an R&D Experiment Bilateral R&D Productivity and Supply Chain Networks Notching R&D Investment with Corporate Income Tax Cuts in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1