Masculinity, Misogyny, and the Limits of Racial Community

P. Gilroy
{"title":"Masculinity, Misogyny, and the Limits of Racial Community","authors":"P. Gilroy","doi":"10.5810/KENTUCKY/9780813175164.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This excerpt from Paul Gilroy’s Black Atlantic offers a different perspective on Wright’s thinking regarding relations between black men and women, and about the ability of black communities more generally to offer liberating narratives of racial authenticity. Gilroy suggests that one legacy of the racially coercive Jim Crow South was domestic authoritarianism, as well as violence in public and intimate relations. Wright recognized this and openly addressed it in his art. According to Gilroy, Wright manifested a protofeminism in his early work and later seemed to recognize the place of black women in racial struggle. At the same time, Wright thought that the stresses of modern black life meant that racial identity, on its own, could not guarantee racial solidarity or even fraternal association. This was evident in Wright’s portraits of black homophobia, misogyny and other antisocial attributes that could not be ascribed solely to racism. This frankness, Gilroy worries, is misunderstood by those who would read him in a narrowly US black context rather than alongside his diverse interlocutors on both sides of the Atlantic.","PeriodicalId":286845,"journal":{"name":"The Politics of Richard Wright","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Politics of Richard Wright","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5810/KENTUCKY/9780813175164.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This excerpt from Paul Gilroy’s Black Atlantic offers a different perspective on Wright’s thinking regarding relations between black men and women, and about the ability of black communities more generally to offer liberating narratives of racial authenticity. Gilroy suggests that one legacy of the racially coercive Jim Crow South was domestic authoritarianism, as well as violence in public and intimate relations. Wright recognized this and openly addressed it in his art. According to Gilroy, Wright manifested a protofeminism in his early work and later seemed to recognize the place of black women in racial struggle. At the same time, Wright thought that the stresses of modern black life meant that racial identity, on its own, could not guarantee racial solidarity or even fraternal association. This was evident in Wright’s portraits of black homophobia, misogyny and other antisocial attributes that could not be ascribed solely to racism. This frankness, Gilroy worries, is misunderstood by those who would read him in a narrowly US black context rather than alongside his diverse interlocutors on both sides of the Atlantic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
男子气概、厌女症和种族共同体的界限
这段摘自保罗·吉尔罗伊的《黑色大西洋》的节选为我们提供了一个不同的视角来看待赖特关于黑人男女关系的思考,以及黑人社区更广泛地提供种族真实性的解放叙事的能力。吉尔罗伊认为,种族强制的南方种族隔离遗留下来的一个问题是国内的威权主义,以及公共和亲密关系中的暴力。赖特意识到了这一点,并在他的艺术中公开表达了这一点。根据吉尔罗伊的说法,赖特在他早期的作品中表现出一种原始的女权主义,后来似乎认识到黑人妇女在种族斗争中的地位。与此同时,赖特认为,现代黑人生活的压力意味着,种族身份本身并不能保证种族团结,甚至不能保证兄弟情谊。这一点在赖特对黑人的同性恋恐惧症、厌女症和其他反社会特征的描述中很明显,这些特征不能仅仅归因于种族主义。吉尔罗伊担心,这种坦率会被那些把他狭隘地放在美国黑人语境中解读,而不是放在大西洋两岸形形色色的对话者的语境中解读的人误解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Behind the McGee Case Slavery Continued, Freedom Sought Richard Wright and Black Women Floating Facts on a Sea of Emotion Reading Richard Wright beyond the Carceral State
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1