{"title":"Transitioning From GILTI to FDII? Foreign Branch Income Issues","authors":"Jeffery M. Kadet, David L. Koontz","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3428540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, Kadet and Koontz discuss certain issues that must be considered when a multinational analyzes whether it should transition certain operations conducted within a CFC (along with the associated income) into a domestic group member so as to achieve an FDII-qualifying structure. In doing so, there will likely be a need to move some key income-earning operations and functions to the United States to assure that the FDII foreign branch rule is not violated. \n \nWhere a group has previously implemented a profit shifting structure that obfuscates where income is generated, there may be few or no operations or functions that require relocation to the United States. In such a case, the transition may highlight a tax exposure to unreported effectively connected income in pretransition years. The article notes Qualcomm's disclosed transition as a possible example of this.","PeriodicalId":330166,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Public Law - Tax eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: Public Law - Tax eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3428540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this article, Kadet and Koontz discuss certain issues that must be considered when a multinational analyzes whether it should transition certain operations conducted within a CFC (along with the associated income) into a domestic group member so as to achieve an FDII-qualifying structure. In doing so, there will likely be a need to move some key income-earning operations and functions to the United States to assure that the FDII foreign branch rule is not violated.
Where a group has previously implemented a profit shifting structure that obfuscates where income is generated, there may be few or no operations or functions that require relocation to the United States. In such a case, the transition may highlight a tax exposure to unreported effectively connected income in pretransition years. The article notes Qualcomm's disclosed transition as a possible example of this.