Government Briefing: Incorporating Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) into Investment Approval Processes

Kelly Dudine, Sam Szoke-Burke
{"title":"Government Briefing: Incorporating Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) into Investment Approval Processes","authors":"Kelly Dudine, Sam Szoke-Burke","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3657672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Investor-state contracts are regularly used in low- and middle-income countries to grant concessions for land-based and natural resource investments, such as agricultural, extractive industry, forestry, or renewable energy projects. These contracts are rarely negotiated in the presence of, or with meaningful input from, the people who risk being adversely affected by the project. This practice will usually risk violating requirements for meaningful consultation, and, where applicable, free, prior and informed consent (FPIC), and is particularly concerning when the investor-state contract gives the investor company rights to lands or resources over which local communities have legitimate claims.<br><br>This article explores how consultation and FPIC processes can be practically integrated into investor-state contract negotiations to better safeguard the land rights and human rights of members of project-affected communities. Based on a review of relevant international law standards and guidance documents, a close analysis of typical investor-state negotiations and of consultation and consent processes in other contexts, and a workshop with Indigenous and civil society representatives, the article provides three options for integrating consultation and consent processes into contract negotiations, the appropriateness of which will vary depending on local contexts and communities’ resources and decision-making structures.","PeriodicalId":388011,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3657672","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Investor-state contracts are regularly used in low- and middle-income countries to grant concessions for land-based and natural resource investments, such as agricultural, extractive industry, forestry, or renewable energy projects. These contracts are rarely negotiated in the presence of, or with meaningful input from, the people who risk being adversely affected by the project. This practice will usually risk violating requirements for meaningful consultation, and, where applicable, free, prior and informed consent (FPIC), and is particularly concerning when the investor-state contract gives the investor company rights to lands or resources over which local communities have legitimate claims.

This article explores how consultation and FPIC processes can be practically integrated into investor-state contract negotiations to better safeguard the land rights and human rights of members of project-affected communities. Based on a review of relevant international law standards and guidance documents, a close analysis of typical investor-state negotiations and of consultation and consent processes in other contexts, and a workshop with Indigenous and civil society representatives, the article provides three options for integrating consultation and consent processes into contract negotiations, the appropriateness of which will vary depending on local contexts and communities’ resources and decision-making structures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政府简报:将自由、事先和知情同意(FPIC)纳入投资审批程序
在低收入和中等收入国家,投资者-国家合同经常用于为土地和自然资源投资(如农业、采掘业、林业或可再生能源项目)提供特许权。这些合同很少是在有可能受到项目不利影响的人在场的情况下进行谈判的,或者从他们那里得到有意义的输入。这种做法通常会违反有意义的协商要求,以及在适用的情况下,自由、事先和知情同意(FPIC)的要求,特别是当投资者-国家合同赋予投资者公司对当地社区拥有合法主张的土地或资源的权利时,这种做法尤其令人担忧。本文探讨了如何将协商和FPIC程序实际地纳入投资者-国家合同谈判,以更好地维护受项目影响社区成员的土地权利和人权。基于对相关国际法标准和指导性文件的审查,对典型的投资者-国家谈判和其他情况下的协商和同意程序的仔细分析,以及与土著和民间社会代表的研讨会,本文提供了将协商和同意程序纳入合同谈判的三种选择:其适当性将视当地情况、社区资源和决策结构而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Joining Forces: The Spillover Effects of EPA Enforcement Actions and the Role of Socially Responsible Investors Media, Reputational Risk, and Bank Loan Contracting The Governance of Enterprise and Supplier Development Corruption and CSR: New Evidence from China’s Anti-Corruption Campaign The “Value” of a Public Benefit Corporation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1