C. Sand, David Baret, Jacques Bolé, S. Domergue, André Ouetcho, Jean‐Marie Wadrawane
{"title":"From test pits to big-scale archaeology in New Caledonia, southern Melanesia","authors":"C. Sand, David Baret, Jacques Bolé, S. Domergue, André Ouetcho, Jean‐Marie Wadrawane","doi":"10.22459/TA51.2019.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following on from pioneering projects (Allen and Gosden 1991; Garanger 1972; Green and Cresswell 1976), Melanesian archaeology has, during the last three decades, seen massive developments. In every archipelago, a number of ambitious research programs were initiated in the 1990s (e.g. Bedford et al. 1999; Clark and Anderson 2009; Sand 1996; Sheppard et al. 2000; Summerhayes 2000) and carried on in the following decades, allowing us to broaden, sometimes exponentially, our knowledge of the long past of this part of Oceania. Sadly, in a period characterised by important economic development in the region with the construction of numerous international hotels and tourism-related facilities, new roads and airstrips, extensions of townships, factories and housing, and logging and mining, very few large-scale archaeological rescue excavations in the form of cultural resource management (CRM) programs have been carried out. Impact studies are non-compulsory or mostly neglected in Oceania. In this regard, clear differences can be identified between the archipelagos of the region. Some nation-states have at times allowed highly destructive economic projects like logging or mining without any previous archaeological studies, while in other instances, multimillion dollar development projects by international companies include a multi-year archaeological assessment of the heritage landscapes before development (e.g. Richards et al. 2016).","PeriodicalId":273724,"journal":{"name":"Archaeologies of Island Melanesia: Current approaches to landscapes, exchange and practice","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeologies of Island Melanesia: Current approaches to landscapes, exchange and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22459/TA51.2019.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Following on from pioneering projects (Allen and Gosden 1991; Garanger 1972; Green and Cresswell 1976), Melanesian archaeology has, during the last three decades, seen massive developments. In every archipelago, a number of ambitious research programs were initiated in the 1990s (e.g. Bedford et al. 1999; Clark and Anderson 2009; Sand 1996; Sheppard et al. 2000; Summerhayes 2000) and carried on in the following decades, allowing us to broaden, sometimes exponentially, our knowledge of the long past of this part of Oceania. Sadly, in a period characterised by important economic development in the region with the construction of numerous international hotels and tourism-related facilities, new roads and airstrips, extensions of townships, factories and housing, and logging and mining, very few large-scale archaeological rescue excavations in the form of cultural resource management (CRM) programs have been carried out. Impact studies are non-compulsory or mostly neglected in Oceania. In this regard, clear differences can be identified between the archipelagos of the region. Some nation-states have at times allowed highly destructive economic projects like logging or mining without any previous archaeological studies, while in other instances, multimillion dollar development projects by international companies include a multi-year archaeological assessment of the heritage landscapes before development (e.g. Richards et al. 2016).
继开创性项目(Allen and Gosden 1991;加朗1972;Green and Cresswell 1976),美拉尼西亚考古学在过去的三十年里取得了巨大的发展。在每个群岛,在20世纪90年代都启动了一些雄心勃勃的研究项目(例如Bedford等人,1999;Clark and Anderson 2009;沙1996;Sheppard et al. 2000;Summerhayes(2000)),并在接下来的几十年里继续进行,使我们对大洋洲这一地区悠久历史的了解得以扩大,有时甚至呈指数级增长。可悲的是,在该地区经济发展的重要时期,建设了许多国际酒店和旅游相关设施,新的道路和飞机跑道,扩展了城镇,工厂和住房,以及伐木和采矿,很少有以文化资源管理(CRM)项目形式进行的大规模考古救援挖掘。在大洋洲,影响研究是非强制性的或大多被忽视。在这方面,本区域各群岛之间可以确定明显的差异。一些民族国家有时会在没有任何考古研究的情况下允许伐木或采矿等高度破坏性的经济项目,而在其他情况下,国际公司数百万美元的开发项目包括在开发前对遗产景观进行多年的考古评估(例如Richards et al. 2016)。