The Need For A Better Method: Comparison Of Direct Smear And Formol-Ether Concentration Techniques In Diagnosing Intestinal Parasites

V. Oguoma, C. Ekwunife
{"title":"The Need For A Better Method: Comparison Of Direct Smear And Formol-Ether Concentration Techniques In Diagnosing Intestinal Parasites","authors":"V. Oguoma, C. Ekwunife","doi":"10.5580/17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study compared results of one direct smear and one formol-ether concentration examination executed on each of 103 stool samples from patients attending a hospital and a medical diagnostic laboratory in Owerri. Formol-ether concentration technique detected 65.26% of positive specimens for one or more intestinal parasites. Direct smear was 34.74% effective. A significant number of the infected population was missed by direct smear method. This accounts for the prevalence of intestinal parasites in the studied population, part of which is ensuing from misdiagnosis. Soft stool exposed most of the intestinal parasites encountered in the study more than other consistency types. Hookworm bears the highest occurrence (15.79%) in soft stools and in the entire study (24.21%) as revealed by concentration method. This study furthermore showed that the age group (9-13) has the highest prevalence for intestinal parasites. Formol-ether detected 23.16% prevalence in this age group while direct smear found 14.74%.","PeriodicalId":331725,"journal":{"name":"The Internet Journal of Tropical Medicine","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Internet Journal of Tropical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5580/17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

The study compared results of one direct smear and one formol-ether concentration examination executed on each of 103 stool samples from patients attending a hospital and a medical diagnostic laboratory in Owerri. Formol-ether concentration technique detected 65.26% of positive specimens for one or more intestinal parasites. Direct smear was 34.74% effective. A significant number of the infected population was missed by direct smear method. This accounts for the prevalence of intestinal parasites in the studied population, part of which is ensuing from misdiagnosis. Soft stool exposed most of the intestinal parasites encountered in the study more than other consistency types. Hookworm bears the highest occurrence (15.79%) in soft stools and in the entire study (24.21%) as revealed by concentration method. This study furthermore showed that the age group (9-13) has the highest prevalence for intestinal parasites. Formol-ether detected 23.16% prevalence in this age group while direct smear found 14.74%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
需要一种更好的方法:直接涂片和甲醛-醚浓度技术诊断肠道寄生虫的比较
该研究比较了对在奥韦里一家医院和一个医疗诊断实验室就诊的患者的103个粪便样本分别进行的一次直接涂片检查和一次甲醚浓度检查的结果。甲醚浓度法检出一种或多种肠道寄生虫阳性标本65.26%。直接涂片有效率为34.74%。直接涂片法漏检了大量的感染人群。这解释了肠道寄生虫在研究人群中的流行,其中一部分是由于误诊造成的。软便暴露了研究中遇到的大多数肠道寄生虫,比其他一致性类型更多。浓度法显示,软便中钩虫的发生率最高(15.79%),整个研究中钩虫的发生率最高(24.21%)。该研究进一步表明,9-13岁年龄组肠道寄生虫患病率最高。甲醚的检出率为23.16%,直接涂片检出率为14.74%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fever of Unknown Origin in a Nigerian Doctor: An unusual case Association Of Lipoprotein [A] In Genders, Age And Lifestyle Related To Coronary Heart Disease In The Dehradun Population. Rhinosprodiosis: Analysis Of Cases Presenting To A Tertiary Care Hospital In Nepal Hydrocelectomy As An Indicator For The Occurrence And Spread Of Lymphatic Filariasis In Kano State, Nigeria Prevalence Of Lymphatic Filariasis In Three Villages In Kano State, Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1