Fiedler and Chemers Revisted; Understanding the Implications of the Least Preferred Co-worker Scale

K. R. Howell
{"title":"Fiedler and Chemers Revisted; Understanding the Implications of the Least Preferred Co-worker Scale","authors":"K. R. Howell","doi":"10.12691/JBMS-6-3-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The importance of succession planning and choosing the right candidate for the job cannot be underestimated. Having a conceptual framework for clear and honest evaluation of a candidate for an open position is a key factor in choosing the “best” one. Fiedler and Chemers work provides one matrix for determining a fit in terms of their Least Preferred Co-Worker scale. It is easy to check off minimum thresholds for education and experience. The evaluation of “fit” for the job is subjective and often laborious task. While many factors contribute to the success of a person in their job, the idea of knowing the best fit for a given situation is a credible and many times key assessment in selecting the eventual employee. The aim of this paper is to immerse the participants in a situation where they must determine the overall environment through the lens of Fiedler and Chemers’ Contingency Theory and select a new leader for the organization.","PeriodicalId":168137,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business and Management Sciences","volume":"13 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business and Management Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12691/JBMS-6-3-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The importance of succession planning and choosing the right candidate for the job cannot be underestimated. Having a conceptual framework for clear and honest evaluation of a candidate for an open position is a key factor in choosing the “best” one. Fiedler and Chemers work provides one matrix for determining a fit in terms of their Least Preferred Co-Worker scale. It is easy to check off minimum thresholds for education and experience. The evaluation of “fit” for the job is subjective and often laborious task. While many factors contribute to the success of a person in their job, the idea of knowing the best fit for a given situation is a credible and many times key assessment in selecting the eventual employee. The aim of this paper is to immerse the participants in a situation where they must determine the overall environment through the lens of Fiedler and Chemers’ Contingency Theory and select a new leader for the organization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
菲尔德勒和Chemers;了解最不喜欢的同事量表的含义
继任计划和选择合适人选的重要性不容低估。对一个空缺职位的候选人有一个清晰而诚实的评估的概念框架是选择“最佳”人选的关键因素。Fiedler和Chemers的研究提供了一个矩阵来确定他们最不喜欢的同事的契合度。对教育和经验的最低要求很容易核对出来。对工作是否“适合”的评估是一项主观且往往费力的任务。虽然一个人在工作中取得成功有很多因素,但在选择最终员工时,了解最适合特定情况的人是一个可靠的,而且很多时候是关键的评估。本文的目的是让参与者沉浸在一种情况中,他们必须通过费德勒和科默斯的权变理论来确定整体环境,并为组织选择新的领导者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Strategic Orientation and Organizational Performance: Evidence from Rotary Clubs in Kenya The Effect of Information Technology on Innovative Performance with Mediation Role of Process Innovation Capability: Evidence from Egyptian SMEs Dose Online Brand Community Help Brands Increase Loyalty? -The Impact of Customer Citizenship Experience Understanding Organizational Capabilities as an Antecedent of Performance of Gigantic Property Management Company Limited in Kenya Collaborative Leadership and Performance: Towards Development of a New Theoretical Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1