Behavior of Boulders within a Debris Flow Initiation Zone

F. Imaizumi, S. Tsuchiya, O. Ohsaka
{"title":"Behavior of Boulders within a Debris Flow Initiation Zone","authors":"F. Imaizumi, S. Tsuchiya, O. Ohsaka","doi":"10.13101/IJECE.9.91","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although it is important to understand the behavior of debris flows in the initiation zone for the development of mitigative measures, data are scarce due to difficulties in field monitoring. To clarify debris flow behavior within the initiation zone, we established a monitoring system in the upper Ichinosawa catchment within the Ohya landslide, central Japan. In the Ohya landslide, loose sediments, previously deposited on steep channel bed, is the main source of debris flow material. Video image analysis of six debris flows revealed that the largest boulders in the debris flows were usually smaller than those in the channel deposits. Thus, debris flows appear to facilitate the selective transport of channel deposits in the upper Ichinosawa catchment. Flows that occur during debris flow surges can be classified as either i) flows comprising mainly cobbles and boulders, or ii) flows comprising mainly muddy water. The duration of each flow type is different amongst debris flow events. Flows mainly composed of cobbles and boulders accounted for most of the surges when channel deposits, which were the main source of debris flow material, were abundant. In contrast, flows were mainly composed of muddy water in surges when channel deposits were scarce. The particle size of the boulders had no clear relationship with flow height, with the size of the largest boulders generally ranging from 15 to 40 cm regardless of flow heights (ranging 0-5 m). The particle size of the material entrained by the debris flow differed among debris flow events. Coarse particles were frequently found on the flow surface when the particle size of the channel deposits was larger. Therefore, the characteristics of boulders in debris flows within the debris-flow initiation zone were affected by the volume and the size of sediment at the source of the debris flow material.","PeriodicalId":378771,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Erosion Control Engineering","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Erosion Control Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13101/IJECE.9.91","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Although it is important to understand the behavior of debris flows in the initiation zone for the development of mitigative measures, data are scarce due to difficulties in field monitoring. To clarify debris flow behavior within the initiation zone, we established a monitoring system in the upper Ichinosawa catchment within the Ohya landslide, central Japan. In the Ohya landslide, loose sediments, previously deposited on steep channel bed, is the main source of debris flow material. Video image analysis of six debris flows revealed that the largest boulders in the debris flows were usually smaller than those in the channel deposits. Thus, debris flows appear to facilitate the selective transport of channel deposits in the upper Ichinosawa catchment. Flows that occur during debris flow surges can be classified as either i) flows comprising mainly cobbles and boulders, or ii) flows comprising mainly muddy water. The duration of each flow type is different amongst debris flow events. Flows mainly composed of cobbles and boulders accounted for most of the surges when channel deposits, which were the main source of debris flow material, were abundant. In contrast, flows were mainly composed of muddy water in surges when channel deposits were scarce. The particle size of the boulders had no clear relationship with flow height, with the size of the largest boulders generally ranging from 15 to 40 cm regardless of flow heights (ranging 0-5 m). The particle size of the material entrained by the debris flow differed among debris flow events. Coarse particles were frequently found on the flow surface when the particle size of the channel deposits was larger. Therefore, the characteristics of boulders in debris flows within the debris-flow initiation zone were affected by the volume and the size of sediment at the source of the debris flow material.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
泥石流起爆区内巨石的行为
虽然了解起爆区泥石流的行为对制定减灾措施很重要,但由于现场监测困难,数据很少。为了明确泥石流起爆区内的泥石流行为,我们在日本中部大谷滑坡的一泽上游流域建立了监测系统。在Ohya滑坡中,先前沉积在陡峭河床上的松散沉积物是泥石流物质的主要来源。对6条泥石流的视频图像分析表明,泥石流中最大的砾石通常比河道沉积物中的砾石小。因此,泥石流似乎促进了一泽上游流域河道沉积物的选择性搬运。泥石流浪涌期间发生的流动可分为主要由鹅卵石和巨石组成的流动,或主要由泥水组成的流动。在泥石流事件中,每种流型的持续时间是不同的。当河道沉积物丰富时,以鹅卵石和巨石为主的水流占涌浪的大部分,河道沉积物是泥石流物质的主要来源。相比之下,当河道沉积物稀少时,水流主要由涌流中的泥水组成。砾石的粒径与流高关系不明显,与流高无关(0 ~ 5 m),最大的砾石粒径一般在15 ~ 40 cm之间。不同泥石流事件中,泥石流携带的物质粒径存在差异。当河道沉积物的粒径较大时,流动表面经常出现粗颗粒。因此,泥石流起爆带内泥石流中巨石的特征受泥石流物质源区泥沙体积和大小的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Urban Expansion and Landslide Risk: Investigating the August 2022 Landslide Events in South Korea Feasibility of Using Permeable Block Sabo Dams Incorporating Breakwater Structures for Volcanic Sediment Management A Case Study of the Evaluation of Slip Surfaces using Mineralogical, Chemical, and Physical Tests Characteristics of Slope Failures Seen outside the Designated Landslide-prone Areas Evaluation of Slip Surface Strength of a Pseudo-Slip Surface Created by Cutting Rock Samples
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1