Toward Sustainable Emerging Economics based on Industry 5.0: Leveraging Neutrosophic Theory in Appraisal Decision Framework

Mona Mohamed, A. Gamal
{"title":"Toward Sustainable Emerging Economics based on Industry 5.0: Leveraging Neutrosophic Theory in Appraisal Decision Framework","authors":"Mona Mohamed, A. Gamal","doi":"10.61356/j.nswa.2023.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Entrepreneurs in emerging economies (EEs) need to expand to survive in a climate of intense competition. Additionally, it must be innovative, imaginative, and open to absorbing new business techniques.  Prior studies proved that Entrepreneur’s success hinges on its capacity to deliver innovative items through employing cutting-edge technologies more quickly than its rivals. In recent decades, digitization—the widespread use of connected digital services by governments, businesses, and consumers—has emerged as a major economic engine that spurs expansion and makes it easier to create jobs. For instance, the next major technological shift is thought to be Industry 5.0 (Ind 5.0). In contrast to Industry 4.0, its goal is to provide manufacturing techniques that are resource-efficient and user-preferred through leveraging the creativity of human specialists in combination with effective, intelligent, and precise machines. Hence, the current study seeks to compile a comprehensive list of obstacles that suppress implementing Ind5.0, to experimentally appraise those obstacles. We construct Appraisal Decision Framework (ADF) generated from deploying Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) as method of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM). Whilst AHP work with aids of neutrosophic set to overcome the vague information in the process of evaluation. Herein, interval-valued neutrosophic numbers (IVNSs) apprise the obstacles of Ind 5.0 in EEs. The neutrosophic AHP method is used to compute the weights of risks, then rank it. The findings of ADF show that cost and fund are the highest in all 12 obstacles, followed by scalability, Lack of Socio-technological Planning, security, and privacy.","PeriodicalId":169974,"journal":{"name":"Neutrosophic Systems with Applications","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neutrosophic Systems with Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61356/j.nswa.2023.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Entrepreneurs in emerging economies (EEs) need to expand to survive in a climate of intense competition. Additionally, it must be innovative, imaginative, and open to absorbing new business techniques.  Prior studies proved that Entrepreneur’s success hinges on its capacity to deliver innovative items through employing cutting-edge technologies more quickly than its rivals. In recent decades, digitization—the widespread use of connected digital services by governments, businesses, and consumers—has emerged as a major economic engine that spurs expansion and makes it easier to create jobs. For instance, the next major technological shift is thought to be Industry 5.0 (Ind 5.0). In contrast to Industry 4.0, its goal is to provide manufacturing techniques that are resource-efficient and user-preferred through leveraging the creativity of human specialists in combination with effective, intelligent, and precise machines. Hence, the current study seeks to compile a comprehensive list of obstacles that suppress implementing Ind5.0, to experimentally appraise those obstacles. We construct Appraisal Decision Framework (ADF) generated from deploying Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) as method of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM). Whilst AHP work with aids of neutrosophic set to overcome the vague information in the process of evaluation. Herein, interval-valued neutrosophic numbers (IVNSs) apprise the obstacles of Ind 5.0 in EEs. The neutrosophic AHP method is used to compute the weights of risks, then rank it. The findings of ADF show that cost and fund are the highest in all 12 obstacles, followed by scalability, Lack of Socio-technological Planning, security, and privacy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
迈向基于工业5.0的可持续新兴经济:评价决策框架中的中性理论
新兴经济体的企业家需要扩张才能在激烈的竞争环境中生存。此外,它必须是创新的,富有想象力的,并开放吸收新的业务技术。先前的研究证明,企业家公司的成功取决于它比竞争对手更快地采用尖端技术提供创新产品的能力。近几十年来,数字化——政府、企业和消费者广泛使用互联数字服务——已经成为刺激经济扩张和创造就业机会的主要经济引擎。例如,下一个主要的技术转变被认为是工业5.0(工业5.0)。与工业4.0相比,它的目标是通过利用人类专家的创造力与有效、智能和精密的机器相结合,提供资源高效和用户首选的制造技术。因此,目前的研究试图编制一份全面的阻碍实施Ind5.0的障碍清单,并对这些障碍进行实验评估。本文构建了运用层次分析法(AHP)生成的评价决策框架(ADF)作为多准则决策(MCDM)方法。而AHP则借助嗜中性集来克服评价过程中信息的模糊性。本文中,区间值中性粒细胞数(IVNSs)提示EEs中Ind 5.0的障碍。采用嗜中性层次分析法计算风险权重,并对其进行排序。ADF的调查结果显示,在所有12个障碍中,成本和资金是最高的,其次是可扩展性、缺乏社会技术规划、安全性和隐私。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Waste Reduction and Recycling: Schweizer-Sklar Aggregation Operators Based on Neutrosophic Fuzzy Rough Sets and Their Application in Green Supply Chain Management A Systematic Approach for Evaluating and Selecting Healthcare Waste Treatment Devices using OWCM-CODAS and Triangular Neutrosophic Sets Leveraging an Uncertainty Methodology to Appraise Risk Factors Threatening Sustainability of Food Supply Chain Exploring the Application of Digital Twin Technology in the Energy Sector using MEREC and MAIRCA Methods Single-Valued Neutrosophic MCDM Approaches Integrated with MEREC and RAM for the Selection of UAVs in Forest Fire Detection and Management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1