Phytochemical analysis, proximate composition and antibacterial activities of Ziziphus Species (Z. jujube and Z. spina christi)

K. Alhassan, Aisha Shuaibu Indabawa, M. M. Shah
{"title":"Phytochemical analysis, proximate composition and antibacterial activities of Ziziphus Species (Z. jujube and Z. spina christi)","authors":"K. Alhassan, Aisha Shuaibu Indabawa, M. M. Shah","doi":"10.21839/jaar.2019.v4i1.262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite tremendous progress in human medicines infectious diseases caused by bacteria, fungi, viruses and parasites are still a major threat to public health. Their impact is particularly large in developing countries due to relative unavailability of medicines and emergence of widespread drugs resistance (Zampini 2009).The aim and objectives of this research work was designed to carried out the Phytochemical analysis, proximate composition and evaluate the antimicrobial activities of the Ziziphus jujube and Ziziphus spina christi leaves against clinical bacterial isolates (Escherichia coli, Staphloccoccus  aureus and Klebsiella  pneumoniae) as they were found out that since ancient times to date, they are used in treating various antimicrobial, ailmentand disorders etc. The results of the research shows that, the effect of antibacterial activities of both aqueous and ethanolic extracts of Ziziphus jujube (e extract conc. aqueous; F=119.37, Bacterial extract conc. aqueous; F=1.00 and extract conc. ethanol; F=15.74, Bacterial extract conc. ethanol; F=0.59) are reciprocal proportional to their counterpart, Ziziphus spina-christi (extract conc. aqueous; F=54.96, Bacterial extract conc. aqueous; F=0.94 and extract conc. ethanol; F=81.11, Bacterial extract conc. ethanol; F=1.37). In sum, the minimum inhibitory concentration of Ziziphus jujube shows that, the aqueous extract has M.I.C at range of 11.7 to 8.7mg/ml on all tested bacteria but the ethanolic extract has M.I.C of 14.8 to 8.2mg/ml range on E.coli, Klepsiella spp and S. aureus. While, the minimum inhibitory concentraton of Ziziphus spina-christi shows that the M.I.C of aqueous extract range of 12.8 to 8.3mg/ml on E. coli, Klepsiella spp and S.aureus. But, Ziziphus spina-christi M.I.C of ethanolic extract is 13.5 to 8.8mg/ml on all the tested bacteria. In sum, Zizuphus spina-christi has lower nutritional content and low MIC ethanolic extract than that of Ziziphus jujube.","PeriodicalId":351224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied and Advanced Research","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied and Advanced Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21839/jaar.2019.v4i1.262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Despite tremendous progress in human medicines infectious diseases caused by bacteria, fungi, viruses and parasites are still a major threat to public health. Their impact is particularly large in developing countries due to relative unavailability of medicines and emergence of widespread drugs resistance (Zampini 2009).The aim and objectives of this research work was designed to carried out the Phytochemical analysis, proximate composition and evaluate the antimicrobial activities of the Ziziphus jujube and Ziziphus spina christi leaves against clinical bacterial isolates (Escherichia coli, Staphloccoccus  aureus and Klebsiella  pneumoniae) as they were found out that since ancient times to date, they are used in treating various antimicrobial, ailmentand disorders etc. The results of the research shows that, the effect of antibacterial activities of both aqueous and ethanolic extracts of Ziziphus jujube (e extract conc. aqueous; F=119.37, Bacterial extract conc. aqueous; F=1.00 and extract conc. ethanol; F=15.74, Bacterial extract conc. ethanol; F=0.59) are reciprocal proportional to their counterpart, Ziziphus spina-christi (extract conc. aqueous; F=54.96, Bacterial extract conc. aqueous; F=0.94 and extract conc. ethanol; F=81.11, Bacterial extract conc. ethanol; F=1.37). In sum, the minimum inhibitory concentration of Ziziphus jujube shows that, the aqueous extract has M.I.C at range of 11.7 to 8.7mg/ml on all tested bacteria but the ethanolic extract has M.I.C of 14.8 to 8.2mg/ml range on E.coli, Klepsiella spp and S. aureus. While, the minimum inhibitory concentraton of Ziziphus spina-christi shows that the M.I.C of aqueous extract range of 12.8 to 8.3mg/ml on E. coli, Klepsiella spp and S.aureus. But, Ziziphus spina-christi M.I.C of ethanolic extract is 13.5 to 8.8mg/ml on all the tested bacteria. In sum, Zizuphus spina-christi has lower nutritional content and low MIC ethanolic extract than that of Ziziphus jujube.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
枣树和青树的植物化学分析、近似成分及抑菌活性
尽管人类医药取得了巨大进步,但由细菌、真菌、病毒和寄生虫引起的传染病仍然是对公众健康的重大威胁。在发展中国家,由于药物相对缺乏和出现了广泛的耐药性,它们的影响尤其大(Zampini 2009)。研究发现,红枣和红枣叶自古以来就被用于治疗各种抗菌、疾病和疾病等,因此本研究的目的是对临床分离的细菌(大肠杆菌、金黄色葡萄球菌和肺炎克雷伯菌)进行植物化学分析、成分测定和抑菌活性评价。研究结果表明,酸枣水提液和醇提液的抑菌效果均优于醇提液。水;F=119.37,细菌提取液;水;F=1.00,提取conc。乙醇;F=15.74,细菌提取液;乙醇;F=0.59)与其对应物齐齐夫斯(提取液conc)成反比。水;F=54.96,细菌提取液;水;F=0.94,提取conc。乙醇;F=81.11,细菌提取液;乙醇;F = 1.37)。综上所述,红枣的最低抑菌浓度表明,水提物对所有被试细菌的抑菌浓度在11.7 ~ 8.7mg/ml之间,而乙醇提物对大肠杆菌、克雷普氏菌和金黄色葡萄球菌的抑菌浓度在14.8 ~ 8.2mg/ml之间。对大肠杆菌、克雷普氏菌和金黄色葡萄球菌的最低抑菌浓度为12.8 ~ 8.3mg/ml。但在所有被试细菌中,酸枣提取物的乙醇浓度为13.5 ~ 8.8mg/ml。综上所述,与酸枣相比,酸枣的营养成分和乙醇提取物的MIC含量较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A comprehensive review on Nipah virus infection control measures Effect of heat stress on dairy cow production, reproduction, health, and potential mitigation strategies Analytic study on strengthening the Future Education competencies in Korea Gender relations in the livestock production in Koinadugu district, Sierra Leone Diagnostic techniques for infectious bovine rhinotracheitis: a review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1