Effectiveness of continuous femoral nerve block for pain relief after total knee arthroplasty: comparison with epidural patient-controlled analgesia and periarticular injection

M. Kim, S. Ko, Yoon Joong Hwang, D. Kwon, Y. Jeon, D. Ryu
{"title":"Effectiveness of continuous femoral nerve block for pain relief after total knee arthroplasty: comparison with epidural patient-controlled analgesia and periarticular injection","authors":"M. Kim, S. Ko, Yoon Joong Hwang, D. Kwon, Y. Jeon, D. Ryu","doi":"10.1177/03000605221085062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To compare the clinical outcomes among three analgesic techniques, continuous femoral nerve block (CFNB), epidural patient-controlled analgesia (EPCA) and periarticular injection (PAI), in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods This retrospective case–control study enrolled patients that underwent TKA. Visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, sleep disturbance, additional opioid consumption and incidence of opioid-related side-effects were assessed. Results A total of 120 patients were categorized into three groups: EPCA (group A, n = 40), PAI (group B, n = 40) and CFNB (group C, n = 40). Group C had significantly lower VAS pain scores than groups A and B at 8, 12 and 24 h after TKA. There were no significant differences in VAS pain scores among the three groups from 48 h after TKA. Sleep quality on the first day after surgery was significantly better in group C than in groups A and B. Additional opioid consumption was significantly lower in the group C than in the groups A and B. Group C showed a lower rate of opioid-related side-effects than groups A and B. Conclusion CFNB was a more effective additional analgesic technique than EPCA or PAI for acute postoperative pain control within 24 h of TKA.","PeriodicalId":245557,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of International Medical Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of International Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605221085062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical outcomes among three analgesic techniques, continuous femoral nerve block (CFNB), epidural patient-controlled analgesia (EPCA) and periarticular injection (PAI), in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods This retrospective case–control study enrolled patients that underwent TKA. Visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, sleep disturbance, additional opioid consumption and incidence of opioid-related side-effects were assessed. Results A total of 120 patients were categorized into three groups: EPCA (group A, n = 40), PAI (group B, n = 40) and CFNB (group C, n = 40). Group C had significantly lower VAS pain scores than groups A and B at 8, 12 and 24 h after TKA. There were no significant differences in VAS pain scores among the three groups from 48 h after TKA. Sleep quality on the first day after surgery was significantly better in group C than in groups A and B. Additional opioid consumption was significantly lower in the group C than in the groups A and B. Group C showed a lower rate of opioid-related side-effects than groups A and B. Conclusion CFNB was a more effective additional analgesic technique than EPCA or PAI for acute postoperative pain control within 24 h of TKA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全膝关节置换术后持续股神经阻滞缓解疼痛的效果:与患者硬膜外自控镇痛和关节周围注射的比较
目的比较连续股神经阻滞(CFNB)、硬膜外自控镇痛(EPCA)和关节周注射(PAI)三种镇痛技术在全膝关节置换术(TKA)中的临床效果。方法本研究为回顾性病例对照研究,纳入接受TKA的患者。评估视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分、睡眠障碍、额外阿片类药物消耗和阿片类药物相关副作用的发生率。结果120例患者分为三组:EPCA组(A组,n = 40)、PAI组(B组,n = 40)和CFNB组(C组,n = 40)。TKA后8、12、24 h, C组VAS疼痛评分明显低于A、B组。TKA后48 h,三组患者VAS疼痛评分无显著差异。C组术后第1天的睡眠质量明显好于A、b组。C组的额外阿片类药物消耗明显低于A、b组。C组阿片类药物相关副作用发生率低于A、b组。结论CFNB在TKA术后24 h内的急性疼痛控制中比EPCA或PAI更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Serological analysis of autoantibody mimicking anti-Rh(e) specificity: a case report Evaluation of the preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of the micropapillary component of stage IA lung adenocarcinoma. Successful guselkumab treatment of a refractory psoriasis patient with Graves’ disease: a case report Deep learning in the radiologic diagnosis of osteoporosis: a literature review Assessing emerging causes of mitral regurgitation: atrial functional mitral regurgitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1