Two centuries of trend following

Y. Lempérière, C. Deremble, P. Seager, M. Potters, J. Bouchaud
{"title":"Two centuries of trend following","authors":"Y. Lempérière, C. Deremble, P. Seager, M. Potters, J. Bouchaud","doi":"10.21314/JOIS.2014.043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We establish the existence of anomalous excess returns based on trend following strategies across four asset classes (commodities, currencies, stock indices, bonds) and over very long time scales. We use for our studies both futures time series, that exist since 1960, and spot time series that allow us to go back to 1800 on commodities and indices. The overall t-stat of the excess returns is $\\approx 5$ since 1960 and $\\approx 10$ since 1800, after accounting for the overall upward drift of these markets. The effect is very stable, both across time and asset classes. It makes the existence of trends one of the most statistically significant anomalies in financial markets. When analyzing the trend following signal further, we find a clear saturation effect for large signals, suggesting that fundamentalist traders do not attempt to resist \"weak trends\", but step in when their own signal becomes strong enough. Finally, we study the performance of trend following in the recent period. We find no sign of a statistical degradation of long trends, whereas shorter trends have significantly withered.","PeriodicalId":286833,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: Portfolio Management","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"77","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: Portfolio Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21314/JOIS.2014.043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 77

Abstract

We establish the existence of anomalous excess returns based on trend following strategies across four asset classes (commodities, currencies, stock indices, bonds) and over very long time scales. We use for our studies both futures time series, that exist since 1960, and spot time series that allow us to go back to 1800 on commodities and indices. The overall t-stat of the excess returns is $\approx 5$ since 1960 and $\approx 10$ since 1800, after accounting for the overall upward drift of these markets. The effect is very stable, both across time and asset classes. It makes the existence of trends one of the most statistically significant anomalies in financial markets. When analyzing the trend following signal further, we find a clear saturation effect for large signals, suggesting that fundamentalist traders do not attempt to resist "weak trends", but step in when their own signal becomes strong enough. Finally, we study the performance of trend following in the recent period. We find no sign of a statistical degradation of long trends, whereas shorter trends have significantly withered.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两个世纪的趋势
我们基于四种资产类别(商品、货币、股票指数、债券)的趋势跟踪策略,在很长的时间尺度上,确立了异常超额回报的存在。我们的研究既使用了自1960年以来存在的期货时间序列,也使用了允许我们追溯到1800年的大宗商品和指数现货时间序列。考虑到这些市场的整体上升趋势,自1960年以来,超额回报的总体t-stat约为5美元,自1800年以来约为10美元。无论在时间上还是在资产类别上,这种影响都非常稳定。它使趋势的存在成为金融市场中统计上最显著的异常现象之一。当进一步分析趋势跟踪信号时,我们发现大信号有明显的饱和效应,这表明基本面交易者不会试图抵制“弱趋势”,而是在他们自己的信号变得足够强时进场。最后,我们研究了近期趋势跟踪的表现。我们没有发现长期趋势在统计上退化的迹象,而较短的趋势则明显萎缩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Discrete-time portfolio optimization under maximum drawdown constraint with partial information and deep learning resolution Robust Optimization Approaches for Portfolio Selection: A Computational and Comparative Analysis Which portfolio is better? A discussion of several possible comparison criteria The "Size Premium" in Equity Markets: Where is the Risk? You are in a drawdown. When should you start worrying
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1