Do Managers Issue More Voluntary Disclosure When GAAP Limits Their Reporting Discretion in Financial Statements?

P. Hribar, Richard D. Mergenthaler, Aaron Roeschley, Spencer Young, Chris X. Zhao
{"title":"Do Managers Issue More Voluntary Disclosure When GAAP Limits Their Reporting Discretion in Financial Statements?","authors":"P. Hribar, Richard D. Mergenthaler, Aaron Roeschley, Spencer Young, Chris X. Zhao","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3308900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examine whether managers convey more information via voluntary disclosure channels when standard-setters limit managers’ discretion in GAAP. We estimate the extent to which standard setters limit managers’ discretion by counting the number of times obligatory modal verbs are mentioned in the text of each standard. Our primary findings indicate managers issue more earnings forecasts, are more likely to disclose non-GAAP earnings, and provide longer yet more readable MD&A disclosures when GAAP limits managers’ discretion. We find the effect is stronger when investors demand more information and when there is better external oversight, and weaker when managers have conflicting reporting objectives. A difference-in-differences analysis around standard changes corroborates these results by finding more non-GAAP adjustments and greater discussion about the standard and its underlying transaction in the MD&A when the new standard limits managers’ discretion more than its predecessor. Collectively, our results suggest managers use additional channels to convey important information when accounting standards limit their ability to do so.","PeriodicalId":181062,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance: Disclosure","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Governance: Disclosure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3308900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

We examine whether managers convey more information via voluntary disclosure channels when standard-setters limit managers’ discretion in GAAP. We estimate the extent to which standard setters limit managers’ discretion by counting the number of times obligatory modal verbs are mentioned in the text of each standard. Our primary findings indicate managers issue more earnings forecasts, are more likely to disclose non-GAAP earnings, and provide longer yet more readable MD&A disclosures when GAAP limits managers’ discretion. We find the effect is stronger when investors demand more information and when there is better external oversight, and weaker when managers have conflicting reporting objectives. A difference-in-differences analysis around standard changes corroborates these results by finding more non-GAAP adjustments and greater discussion about the standard and its underlying transaction in the MD&A when the new standard limits managers’ discretion more than its predecessor. Collectively, our results suggest managers use additional channels to convey important information when accounting standards limit their ability to do so.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当公认会计准则限制了管理者在财务报表中的报告自由裁量权时,管理者是否会更主动地披露信息?
我们考察了当标准制定者在公认会计准则中限制管理者的自由裁量权时,管理者是否通过自愿披露渠道传达了更多的信息。我们通过计算每个标准文本中提到的强制性情态动词的次数来估计标准制定者限制管理人员自由裁量权的程度。我们的主要研究结果表明,当GAAP限制了管理者的自由裁量权时,管理者会发布更多的盈利预测,更有可能披露非GAAP收益,并提供更长但更可读的MD&A披露。我们发现,当投资者要求更多的信息和有更好的外部监督时,这种效应更强,而当管理者的报告目标相互冲突时,这种效应就更弱。围绕标准变化的差异分析证实了这些结果,发现更多的非公认会计准则调整,以及在MD&A中对标准及其潜在交易的更多讨论,而新标准比其前身更多地限制了管理者的自由裁量权。总的来说,我们的结果表明,当会计准则限制了管理者传达重要信息的能力时,他们会使用额外的渠道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Do Firms Redact Information from Material Contracts to Conceal Bad News? Forecasting Shares Outstanding How Important Are Semi-Annual Earnings Announcements? An Information Event Perspective Tone at the Bottom: Measuring Corporate Misconduct Risk from the Text of Employee Reviews Hiding in Plain Sight: The Global Implications of Manager Disclosure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1