The Impact of Gas-Oil Miscibility on Oil Recovery During Huff-and-Puff EOR in Organic-Rich Shales

Felipe Cruz, Sidi Mamoudou, A. Tinni
{"title":"The Impact of Gas-Oil Miscibility on Oil Recovery During Huff-and-Puff EOR in Organic-Rich Shales","authors":"Felipe Cruz, Sidi Mamoudou, A. Tinni","doi":"10.2118/210028-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Injection pressure is a key parameter in the design of a Huff-and-Puff EOR process in organic-rich shales. Reservoir engineering studies have shown that injection pressure and miscibility play a role during Huff-and-Puff EOR. However, during field implementation, the injection pressure is often limited by the number of compressors and in several cases, the gas injected might not reach sufficient pressure to achieve a state of complete miscibility with the oil. These scenarios lead to a condition of partial miscibility or immiscibility which impacts the efficiency of the recovery mechanisms during Huff-and-Puff EOR. The objective of this present study was to quantify experimentally the impact of complete, partial, and immiscible gas injection during Huff-and-Puff EOR in organic-rich shales.\n For the purpose of this study, we have collected crude oil and wax preserved core samples from the Eagle Ford shale formation. The Eagle Ford shale samples were characterized by measurements of mineralogy, TOC, porosity, pore throat size, and specific surface area. We performed 20 Huff-and-Puff EOR tests in the shale samples at several different injection pressures, using two field gases and an immiscible helium gas. The minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) between the field gases and the crude oil was measured using the vanishing interfacial tension technique. Oil recovery for each Huff-and-Puff EOR cycle was quantified using NMR measurements. The produced hydrocarbon compositions were determined using a multi-step dry Pyrolysis measurement at the end of each Huff-and-Puff EOR test.\n Our results show that injection pressure is one of the most important factors controlling the oil recovery during Huff-and-Puff EOR in shales using a field gas. We observe a strong linear increase in oil recovery as injection pressure increases. The injection of the field gas in either partially miscible or completely miscible conditions provides significantly larger oil recovery compared to the immiscible gas at the same absolute pressures. The oil recovery is three times larger for the field gas in a completely miscible condition compared to the immiscible gas and two times larger in a partially miscible condition. The multi-step dry Pyrolysis results show a preferential production of light hydrocarbon species regardless of the state of miscibility during Huff-and-Puff EOR.\n The findings reported in this experimental study will help to optimize the design of field Huff-and-Puff EOR operations in organic-rich shales. The strong linear trend between the injection pressure and the oil recovery factor in the field gas tests can be used for the selection of gas compressors during field implementations. The superior performance of the field gas compared to the immiscible helium gas at the same injection pressures confirms the importance of miscibility during Huff-and-Puff EOR in organic-rich shales.","PeriodicalId":113697,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, October 04, 2022","volume":"7 7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, October 04, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/210028-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Injection pressure is a key parameter in the design of a Huff-and-Puff EOR process in organic-rich shales. Reservoir engineering studies have shown that injection pressure and miscibility play a role during Huff-and-Puff EOR. However, during field implementation, the injection pressure is often limited by the number of compressors and in several cases, the gas injected might not reach sufficient pressure to achieve a state of complete miscibility with the oil. These scenarios lead to a condition of partial miscibility or immiscibility which impacts the efficiency of the recovery mechanisms during Huff-and-Puff EOR. The objective of this present study was to quantify experimentally the impact of complete, partial, and immiscible gas injection during Huff-and-Puff EOR in organic-rich shales. For the purpose of this study, we have collected crude oil and wax preserved core samples from the Eagle Ford shale formation. The Eagle Ford shale samples were characterized by measurements of mineralogy, TOC, porosity, pore throat size, and specific surface area. We performed 20 Huff-and-Puff EOR tests in the shale samples at several different injection pressures, using two field gases and an immiscible helium gas. The minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) between the field gases and the crude oil was measured using the vanishing interfacial tension technique. Oil recovery for each Huff-and-Puff EOR cycle was quantified using NMR measurements. The produced hydrocarbon compositions were determined using a multi-step dry Pyrolysis measurement at the end of each Huff-and-Puff EOR test. Our results show that injection pressure is one of the most important factors controlling the oil recovery during Huff-and-Puff EOR in shales using a field gas. We observe a strong linear increase in oil recovery as injection pressure increases. The injection of the field gas in either partially miscible or completely miscible conditions provides significantly larger oil recovery compared to the immiscible gas at the same absolute pressures. The oil recovery is three times larger for the field gas in a completely miscible condition compared to the immiscible gas and two times larger in a partially miscible condition. The multi-step dry Pyrolysis results show a preferential production of light hydrocarbon species regardless of the state of miscibility during Huff-and-Puff EOR. The findings reported in this experimental study will help to optimize the design of field Huff-and-Puff EOR operations in organic-rich shales. The strong linear trend between the injection pressure and the oil recovery factor in the field gas tests can be used for the selection of gas compressors during field implementations. The superior performance of the field gas compared to the immiscible helium gas at the same injection pressures confirms the importance of miscibility during Huff-and-Puff EOR in organic-rich shales.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
富有机质页岩油气混相对吞吐提高采收率的影响
注入压力是富有机质页岩采收率设计的关键参数。油藏工程研究表明,注入压力和混相在吞吐提高采收率过程中起着重要作用。然而,在现场实施过程中,注入压力往往受到压缩机数量的限制,在某些情况下,注入的气体可能无法达到足够的压力,无法与油完全混溶。这些情况会导致部分混相或不混相的情况,从而影响吞吐提高采收率机制的效率。本研究的目的是通过实验量化富有机质页岩在吞吐提高采收率过程中完全、部分和非混相注气的影响。为了进行这项研究,我们从Eagle Ford页岩地层收集了原油和蜡保存的岩心样本。通过测量矿物学、TOC、孔隙度、孔喉大小和比表面积对Eagle Ford页岩样品进行了表征。我们在几种不同的注入压力下,使用两种现场气体和一种不混相氦气,对页岩样品进行了20次huffand - puff EOR测试。采用消失界面张力技术,测量了油田气体与原油之间的最小混相压力。利用核磁共振测量对每次吞吐EOR循环的采收率进行量化。在每次吞吐EOR测试结束时,通过多步干热解测量来确定产出的碳氢化合物成分。研究结果表明,注压是控制页岩气吞吐采收率的重要因素之一。我们观察到,随着注入压力的增加,采收率呈很强的线性增长。与相同绝对压力下的非混相气体相比,在部分混相或完全混相条件下注入现场气体可提供明显更高的采收率。完全混相条件下的采收率是不混相条件下的三倍,部分混相条件下的采收率是两倍。多步干热解结果表明,在吞吐提高采收率过程中,无论混相状态如何,轻烃都优先生成。本实验研究的结果将有助于优化富有机质页岩的油田吞吐提高采收率作业设计。现场气体试验中注入压力与采收率之间的强线性关系可用于现场实施时气体压缩机的选择。在相同的注入压力下,与不混相的氦气相比,现场气体的优越性能证实了在富有机质页岩中,吞吸式提高采收率时混相的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Economic Yardsticks for the End of Economic Life: Holdback and Its Adjuncts Gas Transport Modeling in Organic-Rich Shales with Nonequilibrium Sorption Kinetics Team Coaching in Oil and Gas Fluid-Pipe Interaction in Horizontal Gas-Liquid Flow A Robust Workflow for Optimizing Drilling/Completion/Frac Design Using Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1