On Keynes’s Formal Development of the Logical Theory of the Multiplier in the A Treatise on Probability in 1921: It Was Keynes Who Helped Kahn, Not Kahn Who Helped Keynes

M. E. Brady
{"title":"On Keynes’s Formal Development of the Logical Theory of the Multiplier in the A Treatise on Probability in 1921: It Was Keynes Who Helped Kahn, Not Kahn Who Helped Keynes","authors":"M. E. Brady","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3286460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Keynes had completely developed the Logical Theory of the Multiplier in his A Treatise on Probability in 1921 in chapter 26 on page 315 and in footnote 1 on page 315. This same analysis appears in his second, 1908, Fellowship Dissertation at Cambridge University. Keynes, however, had no interest in actually publishing a worked out application of the Logical Theory of the Multiplier where one would use arithmetic to actually calculate a worked out example of the process. As pointed out by Kent, Keynes did work out all of the arithmetic steps involved in the multiplier process in 1929, but also made an arithmetic error which he was not concerned with since he already knew that the Multiplier process was mathematically and logically airtight. <br><br> Keynes left the actual presentation of the arithmetic of a completely worked out example of a Multiplier problem, which would be based on the Logical Theory of the Multiplier that he had already worked out in 1908 and 1921, to Kahn. The mathematics of the Investment multiplier, presented on pp. 114-115 of chapter 10 of the General Theory in 1936, is identical to the mathematics used by Keynes in both 1908 and 1921 with respect to his example involving a series of reinsurances aimed at shifting the risk.<br><br>The main problem in the vast literature of the Keynesian Multiplier concept is that no economist was familiar with Keynes’s Risk model in chapter 26 of the A Treatise on Probability. The only economist in the 20th Century to take Keynes’s risk model seriously was Paul Samuelson in a paper published in 1977 in the Journal of Economic Literature. Unfortunately, Samuelson overlooked the footnote that contained Keynes’s worked out analysis in which he took the limit of a geometrical, infinite, declining series to arrive at a finite single number answer.","PeriodicalId":226815,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy & Methodology of Economics eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy & Methodology of Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3286460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Keynes had completely developed the Logical Theory of the Multiplier in his A Treatise on Probability in 1921 in chapter 26 on page 315 and in footnote 1 on page 315. This same analysis appears in his second, 1908, Fellowship Dissertation at Cambridge University. Keynes, however, had no interest in actually publishing a worked out application of the Logical Theory of the Multiplier where one would use arithmetic to actually calculate a worked out example of the process. As pointed out by Kent, Keynes did work out all of the arithmetic steps involved in the multiplier process in 1929, but also made an arithmetic error which he was not concerned with since he already knew that the Multiplier process was mathematically and logically airtight.

Keynes left the actual presentation of the arithmetic of a completely worked out example of a Multiplier problem, which would be based on the Logical Theory of the Multiplier that he had already worked out in 1908 and 1921, to Kahn. The mathematics of the Investment multiplier, presented on pp. 114-115 of chapter 10 of the General Theory in 1936, is identical to the mathematics used by Keynes in both 1908 and 1921 with respect to his example involving a series of reinsurances aimed at shifting the risk.

The main problem in the vast literature of the Keynesian Multiplier concept is that no economist was familiar with Keynes’s Risk model in chapter 26 of the A Treatise on Probability. The only economist in the 20th Century to take Keynes’s risk model seriously was Paul Samuelson in a paper published in 1977 in the Journal of Economic Literature. Unfortunately, Samuelson overlooked the footnote that contained Keynes’s worked out analysis in which he took the limit of a geometrical, infinite, declining series to arrive at a finite single number answer.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论1921年凯恩斯在《概率论》中对乘数逻辑理论的形式化发展:是凯恩斯帮助了卡恩,而不是卡恩帮助了凯恩斯
凯恩斯在1921年的《概率论》第315页的第26章和第315页的脚注1中完全发展了乘数的逻辑理论。同样的分析出现在他1908年在剑桥大学的第二篇奖学金论文中。然而,凯恩斯并没有兴趣出版一个乘数逻辑理论的实际应用,在这个应用中,人们会使用算术来实际计算出这个过程的一个实际例子。正如肯特指出的那样,凯恩斯确实在1929年计算出了乘数过程中涉及的所有算术步骤,但他也犯了一个算术错误,他并不关心这个错误,因为他已经知道乘数过程在数学和逻辑上是无懈可击的。凯恩斯把一个完全解决的乘数问题的实际计算方法留给了卡恩,这个乘数问题将基于他在1908年和1921年已经提出的乘数逻辑理论。1936年在《通论》第10章第114-115页提出的投资乘数的数学方法,与凯恩斯在1908年和1921年所使用的数学方法完全相同,他的例子涉及一系列旨在转移风险的再保险。在凯恩斯乘数概念的大量文献中,主要问题是没有经济学家熟悉凯恩斯在《概率论》(A Treatise on Probability)第26章中的风险模型。20世纪唯一认真对待凯恩斯风险模型的经济学家是保罗•萨缪尔森(Paul Samuelson),他于1977年在《经济文献杂志》(Journal of Economic Literature)上发表了一篇论文。不幸的是,萨缪尔森忽略了一个脚注,其中包含了凯恩斯的分析,在这个分析中,他取了一个几何的、无限的、递减的级数的极限,得到了一个有限的单个数字的答案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"The Eyes and Ears of the Agricultural Markets": A History of Information in Interwar Agricultural Economics Deepening and Widening Social Identity Analysis in Economics In Search of Santa Claus: Samuelson, Stigler, and Coase Theorem Worlds Reports from China: Joan Robinson as Observer and Travel Writer, 1953-78 Introduction to a Symposium on Carl Menger on the Centenary of his Death
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1