Controlling the Crisis

I. Paul
{"title":"Controlling the Crisis","authors":"I. Paul","doi":"10.14361/9783839448274-008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"If it were possible to ventriloquize power today it would only talk over itself, anxiously announcing that “the whole of our world is in crisis” while austerely assuring that “everything is entirely under control.” This contradiction suffuses our present, a historical moment in which elaborate reports on the disintegration of this or that structure or institution double as advertisements for security programs that promise to ever more intensely, impenetrably, and intimately safeguard a seemingly threatened world. These twin voices of crisis and control mutually constitute the principal rationality of contemporary governmentality and power more generally, a logic within which crisis does not follow from the absence or failure of control, but rather is dependent upon — and is the condition of possibility for — control’s instantiation. This text seeks to elucidate how the emergent centrality of crisis in contemporary life, rather than being the consequence of crises beyond control, is instead an output of societies organized by the desire to control crises. Resonating through technical, discursive, aesthetic, and juridical strategies, the crisis-control conjuncture operates as a planetary force that is transformatively re-orchestrating the operations and organizations of power in the present. The first section of this text will draw upon Donna Haraway’s charting of the “informatics of domination,”2 Gilles Deleuze’s prognosis of the coming “societies of control,”3 and the “autonomous world of apparatuses” described in Tiqqun’s Cybernetic Hypothesis in order to theorize the operations of control as well as chart how they’ve been mobilized by Frontex, the agency tasked with policing Europe’s internal and external borders and a truly paradigmatic expression of the dynamics described above. After analyzing Frontex’s networked surveillance and policing of migrants — as well as the regulation and circulation of data resulting from those measures — in the second section of this text I outline how the control and crisis of Europe’s borders have emerged sympoietically, diagramming the crisis-control conjuncture within the historical specificity of the 2015–16 migrant crisis. In the third and final section of the","PeriodicalId":383676,"journal":{"name":"Moving Images","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Moving Images","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839448274-008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

If it were possible to ventriloquize power today it would only talk over itself, anxiously announcing that “the whole of our world is in crisis” while austerely assuring that “everything is entirely under control.” This contradiction suffuses our present, a historical moment in which elaborate reports on the disintegration of this or that structure or institution double as advertisements for security programs that promise to ever more intensely, impenetrably, and intimately safeguard a seemingly threatened world. These twin voices of crisis and control mutually constitute the principal rationality of contemporary governmentality and power more generally, a logic within which crisis does not follow from the absence or failure of control, but rather is dependent upon — and is the condition of possibility for — control’s instantiation. This text seeks to elucidate how the emergent centrality of crisis in contemporary life, rather than being the consequence of crises beyond control, is instead an output of societies organized by the desire to control crises. Resonating through technical, discursive, aesthetic, and juridical strategies, the crisis-control conjuncture operates as a planetary force that is transformatively re-orchestrating the operations and organizations of power in the present. The first section of this text will draw upon Donna Haraway’s charting of the “informatics of domination,”2 Gilles Deleuze’s prognosis of the coming “societies of control,”3 and the “autonomous world of apparatuses” described in Tiqqun’s Cybernetic Hypothesis in order to theorize the operations of control as well as chart how they’ve been mobilized by Frontex, the agency tasked with policing Europe’s internal and external borders and a truly paradigmatic expression of the dynamics described above. After analyzing Frontex’s networked surveillance and policing of migrants — as well as the regulation and circulation of data resulting from those measures — in the second section of this text I outline how the control and crisis of Europe’s borders have emerged sympoietically, diagramming the crisis-control conjuncture within the historical specificity of the 2015–16 migrant crisis. In the third and final section of the
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
控制危机
如果今天有可能对权力进行口技,它只会自言自语,焦虑地宣布“我们的整个世界都处于危机之中”,同时严肃地保证“一切都完全在控制之中”。这种矛盾充斥着我们的当下,在这个历史时刻,关于这个或那个结构或机构解体的详细报道,同时也成为了安全计划的广告,这些计划承诺更加强烈、坚不可摧、密切地保护一个看似受到威胁的世界。危机和控制的这两种声音相互构成了当代治理和权力的主要理性,在这种逻辑中,危机不是源于控制的缺失或失败,而是依赖于控制的实例化,并且是控制的可能性的条件。本文试图阐明危机在当代生活中的新兴中心地位,而不是危机失控的后果,而是由控制危机的愿望组织起来的社会的输出。通过技术、话语、美学和法律策略的共鸣,危机控制的危机作为一种全球性的力量,正在变革地重新协调当前权力的运作和组织。本文的第一部分将借鉴Donna Haraway的“统治信息学”图表,2 Gilles Deleuze对即将到来的“控制社会”的预测,3以及Tiqqun的控制论假说中描述的“机器的自治世界”,以便将控制的操作理论化,并绘制出它们是如何被Frontex动员起来的图表,该机构的任务是监管欧洲的内部和外部边界,是上述动态的真正范例。在分析了Frontex对移民的网络监控和警务——以及这些措施所产生的数据的监管和流通——之后,在本文的第二部分,我概述了欧洲边境的控制和危机是如何对称地出现的,并在2015-16年移民危机的历史特殊性中绘制了危机控制的图表。在第三部分也是最后一部分
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Frontmatter #Rockumenta Either You Get it Or You Don’t A Sensible Politics. Image Operations of Europe’s Refugee Crisis Lies of the Land
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1