Towards Less Flexibility

Eleonora Rosati
{"title":"Towards Less Flexibility","authors":"Eleonora Rosati","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198837176.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter maps a trend that, with increasing clarity, has been emerging at the level of case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union: on the one hand, the harmonizing force of EU copyright law—especially as interpreted by the Court—is greater than what individual EU Member States’ practices have suggested; on the other hand, and as a result of this, the freedom left to the various national legislatures (and courts) in areas harmonized by EU legislation is more limited than what has been believed to be the case in the past. A discussion and application of the emerging doctrine of EU preemption is provided in relation to selected areas (economic rights and exceptions and limitations).","PeriodicalId":313855,"journal":{"name":"Copyright and the Court of Justice of the European Union","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Copyright and the Court of Justice of the European Union","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198837176.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter maps a trend that, with increasing clarity, has been emerging at the level of case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union: on the one hand, the harmonizing force of EU copyright law—especially as interpreted by the Court—is greater than what individual EU Member States’ practices have suggested; on the other hand, and as a result of this, the freedom left to the various national legislatures (and courts) in areas harmonized by EU legislation is more limited than what has been believed to be the case in the past. A discussion and application of the emerging doctrine of EU preemption is provided in relation to selected areas (economic rights and exceptions and limitations).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减少灵活性
本章描绘了一种趋势,这种趋势越来越清晰,已经在欧盟法院的判例法层面出现:一方面,欧盟版权法的协调力量——特别是由法院解释的——比单个欧盟成员国的实践所暗示的更大;另一方面,由于这一点,在欧盟立法协调的领域,留给各国立法机构(和法院)的自由比过去所认为的情况更加有限。本文就选定领域(经济权利、例外和限制)对新兴的欧盟优先原则进行了讨论和应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CJEU Case Law and the Interplay with Policy and Legislative Action in the DSM Relevance of EU Copyright Law to (Future) Non-EU Member States Enforcement of Copyright The Construction of Exceptions and Limitations in the InfoSoc Directive The Construction of Economic Rights in the InfoSoc Directive
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1