The Law Commission’s Proposals

Russell Sandberg
{"title":"The Law Commission’s Proposals","authors":"Russell Sandberg","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv1rxdqpz.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores Law Commission’s consultation paper, published in September 2020, which proposed a transformation the law on how people get married. The chapter falls into three parts. The first part introduces the Law Commission’s approach, it looks at what was excluded from its terms of reference and the main changes to how people get married that are proposed. The second part then discusses the most radical change proposed by the Law Commission: the move from the Marriage Act 1949’s focus on registering buildings towards what the Law Commission has styled an officiant system and how this would accommodate non-religious marriages. The final part looks at how the scoping paper discussed the issue of unregistered religious marriages and the extent to which the reforms suggested would help to mitigate that issue, including an examination of what the Law Commission suggests in terms of the law on validity and on criminal offences concerning the solemnisation of marriage. Taken together, the proposals do not provide a magic bullet solution but they do provide important steps forward. There are points of contention but overall the proposals if enacted would provide a great deal of improvement.","PeriodicalId":250688,"journal":{"name":"Religion and Marriage Law","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religion and Marriage Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1rxdqpz.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter explores Law Commission’s consultation paper, published in September 2020, which proposed a transformation the law on how people get married. The chapter falls into three parts. The first part introduces the Law Commission’s approach, it looks at what was excluded from its terms of reference and the main changes to how people get married that are proposed. The second part then discusses the most radical change proposed by the Law Commission: the move from the Marriage Act 1949’s focus on registering buildings towards what the Law Commission has styled an officiant system and how this would accommodate non-religious marriages. The final part looks at how the scoping paper discussed the issue of unregistered religious marriages and the extent to which the reforms suggested would help to mitigate that issue, including an examination of what the Law Commission suggests in terms of the law on validity and on criminal offences concerning the solemnisation of marriage. Taken together, the proposals do not provide a magic bullet solution but they do provide important steps forward. There are points of contention but overall the proposals if enacted would provide a great deal of improvement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法律委员会的建议
本章探讨了法律委员会于2020年9月发布的咨询文件,该文件提出了对人们如何结婚的法律进行改革。本章分为三个部分。第一部分介绍了法律委员会的方法,它着眼于被排除在其职权范围之外的内容以及人们如何求婚的主要变化。第二部分讨论了法律委员会提出的最激进的改变:从1949年《婚姻法》对登记建筑物的关注转向法律委员会所设计的司仪制度,以及这将如何适应非宗教婚姻。最后一部分探讨了界定范围的文件如何讨论未登记的宗教婚姻问题,以及所建议的改革将在多大程度上有助于减轻这一问题,包括审查法律委员会就有关婚姻的有效性和刑事犯罪的法律提出的建议。总的来说,这些建议并没有提供灵丹妙药,但它们确实提供了重要的前进步骤。虽然存在一些争论点,但总的来说,如果这些建议得以实施,将会带来很大的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Religion and Same-Sex Marriage Unregistered Religious Marriages Reforming Cohabitation Rights Index Non-Religious Marriages
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1