MIXED EVIDENCE FOR NICHE CONSERVATISM IN MOUNTAIN BEAVER (APLODONTIA RUFA) LINEAGES

Jennie Jones Scherbinski, A. Piaggio, W. Bean
{"title":"MIXED EVIDENCE FOR NICHE CONSERVATISM IN MOUNTAIN BEAVER (APLODONTIA RUFA) LINEAGES","authors":"Jennie Jones Scherbinski, A. Piaggio, W. Bean","doi":"10.1898/1051-1733-102.3.196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Range shifts in response to past climatic changes have been documented in a variety of species and have often resulted in the isolation of relict populations. Understanding how these isolated populations develop local adaptations or maintain their historic climatic niche is crucial to creating effective management plans in the face of current climate change. While Mountain Beavers (Aplodontia rufa) have endured through major climatic shifts in the past, they maintain physiological constraints that limit their distribution to cool, humid climates. Increasing temperatures since the last glacial maximum likely had a strong influence in reducing their range. The species now persists as 5 genetically distinct clades, but it is not clear to what extent climatic differences have driven genetic isolation compared to other factors like topography. We compared species-distribution models (SDMs) for the 5 clades of Mountain Beaver to understand whether this species tends towards niche conservatism or adapts to local climates. Presence points from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility were divided into clades and combined with climatic layers from BioClim to develop SDMs for each clade. Niche overlap was then compared to genetic relatedness between all pairings of clades. High temperatures were a limiting factor in distribution for all clades and, despite a low level of niche overlap at broad scales, Mountain Beavers appeared to display some level of niche conservatism. These landscape level SDMs showed that some clades do exist in a warmer climate than other Mountain Beavers; however, fine-scale models for the Point Arena subspecies suggested they persist by selecting the coolest places within that range. This suggests that niche overlap between clades may be higher than what is detected at the coarser scale. Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms limiting the distribution of these subspecies.","PeriodicalId":142406,"journal":{"name":"Northwestern Naturalist","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Northwestern Naturalist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1898/1051-1733-102.3.196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Range shifts in response to past climatic changes have been documented in a variety of species and have often resulted in the isolation of relict populations. Understanding how these isolated populations develop local adaptations or maintain their historic climatic niche is crucial to creating effective management plans in the face of current climate change. While Mountain Beavers (Aplodontia rufa) have endured through major climatic shifts in the past, they maintain physiological constraints that limit their distribution to cool, humid climates. Increasing temperatures since the last glacial maximum likely had a strong influence in reducing their range. The species now persists as 5 genetically distinct clades, but it is not clear to what extent climatic differences have driven genetic isolation compared to other factors like topography. We compared species-distribution models (SDMs) for the 5 clades of Mountain Beaver to understand whether this species tends towards niche conservatism or adapts to local climates. Presence points from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility were divided into clades and combined with climatic layers from BioClim to develop SDMs for each clade. Niche overlap was then compared to genetic relatedness between all pairings of clades. High temperatures were a limiting factor in distribution for all clades and, despite a low level of niche overlap at broad scales, Mountain Beavers appeared to display some level of niche conservatism. These landscape level SDMs showed that some clades do exist in a warmer climate than other Mountain Beavers; however, fine-scale models for the Point Arena subspecies suggested they persist by selecting the coolest places within that range. This suggests that niche overlap between clades may be higher than what is detected at the coarser scale. Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms limiting the distribution of these subspecies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
山狸(aplodontia rufa)谱系生态位保守性的混合证据
在过去的气候变化中,各种物种的范围变化已经被记录下来,并且经常导致孑遗种群的隔离。面对当前的气候变化,了解这些孤立的种群如何发展当地适应性或维持其历史气候生态位对于制定有效的管理计划至关重要。虽然山狸(Aplodontia rufa)在过去经历了重大的气候变化,但它们保持着生理上的限制,限制了它们在凉爽潮湿的气候下的分布。自最后一次冰期极大期以来,气温的升高很可能对缩小它们的活动范围产生了强烈影响。该物种现在以5个遗传上不同的分支存在,但与地形等其他因素相比,尚不清楚气候差异在多大程度上推动了遗传隔离。我们比较了山狸5个分支的物种分布模型(SDMs),以了解该物种是倾向于生态位保守主义还是适应当地气候。来自全球生物多样性信息设施的存在点被划分为支系,并结合BioClim的气候层为每个支系开发sdm。然后将生态位重叠与所有进化枝对之间的遗传亲缘关系进行比较。高温是所有进化支分布的限制因素,尽管在大尺度上生态位重叠程度很低,但山海狸似乎表现出一定程度的生态位保守性。这些景观水平的SDMs表明,一些分支确实存在于比其他山地海狸更温暖的气候中;然而,角竞技场亚种的精细模型表明,它们通过选择该范围内最冷的地方来生存。这表明,进化支之间的生态位重叠可能比在较粗的尺度上检测到的要高。需要进一步的研究来了解限制这些亚种分布的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
AMERICAN AVOCETS AT COOKING LAKE, ALBERTA, 2009–2023, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO LARGE AGGREGATION SIZE, LOW REPRODUCTION RATE, LATE MIGRATION DEPARTURE, AND EFFECTIVE PREDATOR AVOIDANCE MARINE MAMMAL AND MARINE BIRD SURVEYS DURING THE WINDFLOAT PACIFIC OFFSHORE WIND PROJECT NEAR COOS BAY, OREGON, 2014 AND 2015 INDEX TO VOLUME 104 LIFETIME MEMBERS OF THE SOCIETY FOR NORTHWESTERN VERTEBRATE BIOLOGY REVIEWERS FOR VOLUME 104
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1