Knee Injury Diagnostic Device

Juliet E. McKenna, Tyler R. Hopkins, Lucas T. Lavallee, D. Dow
{"title":"Knee Injury Diagnostic Device","authors":"Juliet E. McKenna, Tyler R. Hopkins, Lucas T. Lavallee, D. Dow","doi":"10.1109/UEMCON51285.2020.9298081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Knee injuries are difficult to accurately diagnose. The manual evaluation relies on many subjective factors such as physician experience, swelling, patient guarding, and the severity of the injury. These factors can lead to an inaccurate or incomplete diagnosis, resulting in less than optimal treatment and recovery. Knee injuries are very common among athletes and can occur during the day to day activities, with many resulting in tears to one or more of the four ligaments. For evaluation, a physician manually manipulates the knee with a series of standard tests. Even though these standard manual tests are considered best practice, they are known to lead to some inaccuracies with upwards of 1 in 8 patients being misdiagnosed due to testing deficiencies. Imaging by MRI is used to support the diagnosis if available, though not available to all patients due to cost and time requirements. This purpose of this project was to develop and test a wearable diagnostic system contained within a sleeve over the knee. Incorporated sensors were used to monitor movement and electromyographic activity to determine quantitative measurements toward a diagnosis. The movement and displacement monitoring subsystems were tested on a constructed model of the lower leg and knee. Preliminary results have shown accurate readings with an average percent error of 1% for range of motion testing and 3% (0.1 to 0.2 mm) for laxity testing. This measurement determined by this system could be reported to a physician who could use when making a diagnosis. Improved diagnosis would guide appropriate treatment and contribute to improved recovery.","PeriodicalId":433609,"journal":{"name":"2020 11th IEEE Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics & Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON)","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 11th IEEE Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics & Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/UEMCON51285.2020.9298081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Knee injuries are difficult to accurately diagnose. The manual evaluation relies on many subjective factors such as physician experience, swelling, patient guarding, and the severity of the injury. These factors can lead to an inaccurate or incomplete diagnosis, resulting in less than optimal treatment and recovery. Knee injuries are very common among athletes and can occur during the day to day activities, with many resulting in tears to one or more of the four ligaments. For evaluation, a physician manually manipulates the knee with a series of standard tests. Even though these standard manual tests are considered best practice, they are known to lead to some inaccuracies with upwards of 1 in 8 patients being misdiagnosed due to testing deficiencies. Imaging by MRI is used to support the diagnosis if available, though not available to all patients due to cost and time requirements. This purpose of this project was to develop and test a wearable diagnostic system contained within a sleeve over the knee. Incorporated sensors were used to monitor movement and electromyographic activity to determine quantitative measurements toward a diagnosis. The movement and displacement monitoring subsystems were tested on a constructed model of the lower leg and knee. Preliminary results have shown accurate readings with an average percent error of 1% for range of motion testing and 3% (0.1 to 0.2 mm) for laxity testing. This measurement determined by this system could be reported to a physician who could use when making a diagnosis. Improved diagnosis would guide appropriate treatment and contribute to improved recovery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
膝关节损伤诊断装置
膝关节损伤很难准确诊断。人工评估依赖于许多主观因素,如医生经验、肿胀、患者保护和损伤的严重程度。这些因素可能导致不准确或不完整的诊断,导致不理想的治疗和恢复。膝关节损伤在运动员中很常见,可能发生在日常活动中,许多人会导致四根韧带中的一条或多条撕裂。为了评估,医生通过一系列标准测试手动操作膝关节。尽管这些标准的手工测试被认为是最佳实践,但众所周知,它们会导致一些不准确的情况,由于测试缺陷,超过八分之一的患者被误诊。核磁共振成像(MRI)可用来辅助诊断,但由于成本和时间要求,并非所有患者都可用。该项目的目的是开发和测试一种可穿戴诊断系统,该系统包含在膝盖上方的袖子中。合并传感器用于监测运动和肌电图活动,以确定诊断的定量测量。在构建的小腿和膝关节模型上对运动和位移监测子系统进行了测试。初步结果显示准确的读数,运动范围测试的平均误差为1%,松弛测试的平均误差为3%(0.1至0.2 mm)。该系统确定的测量值可以报告给医生,医生可以在诊断时使用。改进诊断将指导适当的治疗,并有助于改善康复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Agile Edge Classification of Ocean Sounds EMG-based Hand Gesture Recognition by Deep Time-frequency Learning for Assisted Living & Rehabilitation A High Security Signature Algorithm Based on Kerberos for REST-style Cloud Storage Service A Comparison of Blockchain-Based Wireless Sensor Network Protocols Computer Vision based License Plate Detection for Automated Vehicle Parking Management System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1