PREFACE TO THE PAPERBACK EDITION

{"title":"PREFACE TO THE PAPERBACK EDITION","authors":"","doi":"10.12987/9780300224467-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is always a pleasure for an author to be asked to introduce an additional edition of one of his works, in this case for William Goetzmann's distinguished American studies series. On this occasion my pleasure has been enhanced by the unusual circumstances of the reissue. The Eastern Establishment and the Western Experience originally appeared in 1968, having been a doctoral dissertation that I submitted to the Department of American Studies at Yale the previous year. The book was in a tradition of American studies literature on the relationship between symbolic figures and images in America and the culture in which they had appeared. Shortly after the book appeared that sort of methodology became less compelling in academic circles, quantitative studies became more in vogue, and a genre of works that had their origin with Henry Nash Smith's Virgin Land and R. W. B. Lewis' The American Adam became encapsulated in time. I would not like to think there was any causal relationship between the appearance of my book and the end of the genre, but the fact was that by the early 1970s American studies work of that sort was not being produced and The Eastern Establishment and the Western Experience was out of print. One reviewer of the first edition had noted that I was attending Harvard Law School at the time of its appearance and surmised that I might \"write no more.\" For a time I did not, and when my next book appeared, in 1976, it was in legal history and I was a law professor. Since then I have not done any more western history, although I have been fortunate enough to have a chance to apply some of the techniques I used in the first edition of The Eastern Establishment to some legal history topics. In my most recent book, for example, a cultural history of the Marshall Court, I revisit the writings of James Fenimore Cooper, whom I treat with a different","PeriodicalId":432510,"journal":{"name":"The End of the Asian Century","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The End of the Asian Century","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300224467-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is always a pleasure for an author to be asked to introduce an additional edition of one of his works, in this case for William Goetzmann's distinguished American studies series. On this occasion my pleasure has been enhanced by the unusual circumstances of the reissue. The Eastern Establishment and the Western Experience originally appeared in 1968, having been a doctoral dissertation that I submitted to the Department of American Studies at Yale the previous year. The book was in a tradition of American studies literature on the relationship between symbolic figures and images in America and the culture in which they had appeared. Shortly after the book appeared that sort of methodology became less compelling in academic circles, quantitative studies became more in vogue, and a genre of works that had their origin with Henry Nash Smith's Virgin Land and R. W. B. Lewis' The American Adam became encapsulated in time. I would not like to think there was any causal relationship between the appearance of my book and the end of the genre, but the fact was that by the early 1970s American studies work of that sort was not being produced and The Eastern Establishment and the Western Experience was out of print. One reviewer of the first edition had noted that I was attending Harvard Law School at the time of its appearance and surmised that I might "write no more." For a time I did not, and when my next book appeared, in 1976, it was in legal history and I was a law professor. Since then I have not done any more western history, although I have been fortunate enough to have a chance to apply some of the techniques I used in the first edition of The Eastern Establishment to some legal history topics. In my most recent book, for example, a cultural history of the Marshall Court, I revisit the writings of James Fenimore Cooper, whom I treat with a different
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
平装版序言
对于一个作者来说,被邀请介绍他的作品的增订版本总是一件令人高兴的事,这次是为威廉·戈茨曼(William Goetzmann)著名的美国研究系列。在这种情况下,我很高兴再次发行。《东方建制派与西方经验》最初出现于1968年,是我前一年提交给耶鲁大学美国研究系的博士论文。这本书遵循了美国研究文学的传统,研究美国的象征性人物和形象与它们出现的文化之间的关系。在这本书出版后不久,这种方法论在学术界变得不那么引人注目,定量研究变得更加流行,而起源于亨利·纳什·史密斯的处女地和r·w·b·刘易斯的《美国人亚当》的一类作品也被时间所浓缩。我不愿意认为我的书的出现和这一流派的终结之间有任何因果关系,但事实是,到20世纪70年代初,这类美国研究工作已经没有了,《东方建制与西方经验》也已经绝版了。第一版的一位书评人注意到,这本书出版时,我正在哈佛法学院(Harvard Law School)读书,他猜测我可能“不会再写了”。有一段时间我没有,当我的下一本书在1976年出版时,它是关于法律史的,而我是一名法学教授。从那以后,我没有再研究西方历史,尽管我很幸运有机会将我在《东方制度》第一版中使用的一些技巧应用到一些法律史主题上。例如,在我最近的一本书《马歇尔法院的文化史》中,我重新审视了詹姆斯·费尼莫尔·库珀(James Fenimore Cooper)的作品,我用一种不同的方式对待他
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
3. The Goldilocks Dilemma 4. Asia’s Mesdames Defarges 6. Hic Sunt Dracones: The Clouds of War Frontmatter 2. The Asian Miracle at Risk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1