Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Studies: A Research Method Primer

Jasmine Zouhair
{"title":"Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Studies: A Research Method Primer","authors":"Jasmine Zouhair","doi":"10.26685/urncst.399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: A cohort study is a nonexperimental study design used to investigate the outcomes of a particular risk factor. They help researchers understand the prevalence, distribution, and correlation of variables in a population and function by following participants over a period of time, typically years. Utility: The results of well-designed observational studies are comparable to those of randomized controlled trials. Among some of the strengths of cohort studies is the ability to measure incidence rates, and to allow for a wide range of variables to be examined. In addition, one can examine disease progression and natural history because of their longitudinal design characteristic. Specifically, they are advantageous for rare exposures since subjects are chosen based on exposure status and can be monitored throughout the study for any changes caused by said exposure. Although they can infer a relationship between variables, they do not confirm causality. Challenges: One of the greatest challenges posed by cohort studies is the considerable amount of time and funding required to conduct them as they require large samples. Other challenges include, but are not limited to, maintaining follow-ups and accounting for withdrawals, and minimal control over the variables that are being studied Limitations: Variables may be measured incorrectly or inconsistently, resulting in information bias. For diseases with extensive latency periods, this study strategy is ineffective and cannot be used to establish causation between variables because the disease may have not completely manifested in the time it takes to conduct the study. Another significant limitation of this design is the sources of bias that could jeopardize the reliability of the study as a result of faulty measurement, an unrepresentative sample, or the differing impact of other factors on the association of interest.","PeriodicalId":245521,"journal":{"name":"Undergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Undergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26685/urncst.399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: A cohort study is a nonexperimental study design used to investigate the outcomes of a particular risk factor. They help researchers understand the prevalence, distribution, and correlation of variables in a population and function by following participants over a period of time, typically years. Utility: The results of well-designed observational studies are comparable to those of randomized controlled trials. Among some of the strengths of cohort studies is the ability to measure incidence rates, and to allow for a wide range of variables to be examined. In addition, one can examine disease progression and natural history because of their longitudinal design characteristic. Specifically, they are advantageous for rare exposures since subjects are chosen based on exposure status and can be monitored throughout the study for any changes caused by said exposure. Although they can infer a relationship between variables, they do not confirm causality. Challenges: One of the greatest challenges posed by cohort studies is the considerable amount of time and funding required to conduct them as they require large samples. Other challenges include, but are not limited to, maintaining follow-ups and accounting for withdrawals, and minimal control over the variables that are being studied Limitations: Variables may be measured incorrectly or inconsistently, resulting in information bias. For diseases with extensive latency periods, this study strategy is ineffective and cannot be used to establish causation between variables because the disease may have not completely manifested in the time it takes to conduct the study. Another significant limitation of this design is the sources of bias that could jeopardize the reliability of the study as a result of faulty measurement, an unrepresentative sample, or the differing impact of other factors on the association of interest.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纵向前瞻性队列研究:一种研究方法入门
队列研究是一种非实验研究设计,用于调查特定危险因素的结果。他们通过一段时间(通常是几年)跟踪参与者,帮助研究人员了解人口和函数中变量的患病率、分布和相关性。实用性:设计良好的观察性研究的结果与随机对照试验的结果相当。队列研究的优势之一是能够测量发病率,并允许对广泛的变量进行检查。此外,由于纵向设计的特点,人们可以检查疾病进展和自然史。具体来说,它们对罕见的暴露是有利的,因为受试者是根据暴露状态选择的,并且可以在整个研究过程中监测暴露引起的任何变化。虽然它们可以推断出变量之间的关系,但它们不能证实因果关系。挑战:队列研究面临的最大挑战之一是需要大量的时间和资金来进行它们,因为它们需要大量的样本。其他挑战包括,但不限于,维持随访和对退出的核算,以及对正在研究的变量的最小控制。局限性:变量可能测量不正确或不一致,导致信息偏差。对于潜伏期较长的疾病,这种研究策略是无效的,不能用于建立变量之间的因果关系,因为疾病可能在进行研究所需的时间内尚未完全表现出来。该设计的另一个重要限制是,由于测量错误、样本不具代表性或其他因素对相关兴趣的不同影响,偏倚的来源可能危及研究的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
INNOVATX Global Health Case Competition 2024 – Presented by McMaster Friends of Médecins Sans Frontières The Effects of Alistipes-Produced GABA on the Murine Gut-Brain Serotonergic System and Major Depressive Disorder: A Research Protocol MISA Case Competition 2024 Electroencephalography and Magnetoencephalography Signatures of Ketamine Treatment in Depression: A Literature Review The The Role of ICAM-1 on Immune Cells in Glioblastoma: A Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1