The Nile in Darkness: a flawed unity, 1863–1899 (review)

Cherry Leonardi
{"title":"The Nile in Darkness: a flawed unity, 1863–1899 (review)","authors":"Cherry Leonardi","doi":"10.1353/afr.2007.0079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Portuguese explorers and fragments of Germany’s early military presence in Southwest Africa. A long excursion into the life and (mostly domestic) politics of German Reich Chancellor von Caprivi leads into the negotiations that resulted in the 1890 Anglo-German territorial swap that created the German access corridor to the Zambezi known as the ‘Caprivi Zipfel’. Okupa has some interesting points to make here, and with issues of international law she is clearly on more familiar scholarly ground. The next 150 pages are concerned with the scandalous atrocities and war of extermination committed by the German colonial military against the Herero, Nama and other indigenous groups between 1904 and 1908. Much of this has already been covered extensively by various other scholars more capable of working with the available archival material. Long sections are taken up by details of, for example, German colonial military award medals, railway and firearms technology, Herero social organization and chiefly genealogy, polygamy and Christianity. Okupa’s key contribution here lies in her emotional and engaging narrative of the Herero’s ordeal in the Omaheke Desert following the appalling Waterberg massacre of 1904. But while the acknowledgements indicate she has collected interview material from recently repatriated descendants of survivors, the author neither names nor quotes her Herero sources directly. The book then shifts to another legacy of German colonialism in Namibia: the Caprivi Strip. Okupa’s discussion of the pre-colonial and colonial administration of Caprivi, the history of the area and its people again contains little new material, while failing to exclude unnecessary excursions and various inaccuracies. The last two chapters are concerned with the colonial origins and 1999 settlement by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) of the boundary dispute between Namibia and Botswana over the Kasikili/Sedudu island. Long sections of treaty texts, official communications and hearing transcripts appear with little analysis. Scholars interested in Caprivi or working on the historical origins and current disputes over African boundaries, international and African customary law may find some interesting leads to further material here, but the ICJ website provides most of this in a well-organized manner. While the appearance of the book is neat and balanced most of the maps, diagrams and photographs add little value. The main title and some chapter headings offer no clue regarding the contents. There are countless mistakes, inconsistencies and omissions in references, footnotes and quotations throughout the book. The same lengthy section of text from the 1890 AngloGerman agreement appears in full no less than three separate times. That the publisher should have sent a manuscript in this under-edited and uncorrected form to the printers is utterly surprising.","PeriodicalId":337749,"journal":{"name":"Africa: The Journal of the International African Institute","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Africa: The Journal of the International African Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/afr.2007.0079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Portuguese explorers and fragments of Germany’s early military presence in Southwest Africa. A long excursion into the life and (mostly domestic) politics of German Reich Chancellor von Caprivi leads into the negotiations that resulted in the 1890 Anglo-German territorial swap that created the German access corridor to the Zambezi known as the ‘Caprivi Zipfel’. Okupa has some interesting points to make here, and with issues of international law she is clearly on more familiar scholarly ground. The next 150 pages are concerned with the scandalous atrocities and war of extermination committed by the German colonial military against the Herero, Nama and other indigenous groups between 1904 and 1908. Much of this has already been covered extensively by various other scholars more capable of working with the available archival material. Long sections are taken up by details of, for example, German colonial military award medals, railway and firearms technology, Herero social organization and chiefly genealogy, polygamy and Christianity. Okupa’s key contribution here lies in her emotional and engaging narrative of the Herero’s ordeal in the Omaheke Desert following the appalling Waterberg massacre of 1904. But while the acknowledgements indicate she has collected interview material from recently repatriated descendants of survivors, the author neither names nor quotes her Herero sources directly. The book then shifts to another legacy of German colonialism in Namibia: the Caprivi Strip. Okupa’s discussion of the pre-colonial and colonial administration of Caprivi, the history of the area and its people again contains little new material, while failing to exclude unnecessary excursions and various inaccuracies. The last two chapters are concerned with the colonial origins and 1999 settlement by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) of the boundary dispute between Namibia and Botswana over the Kasikili/Sedudu island. Long sections of treaty texts, official communications and hearing transcripts appear with little analysis. Scholars interested in Caprivi or working on the historical origins and current disputes over African boundaries, international and African customary law may find some interesting leads to further material here, but the ICJ website provides most of this in a well-organized manner. While the appearance of the book is neat and balanced most of the maps, diagrams and photographs add little value. The main title and some chapter headings offer no clue regarding the contents. There are countless mistakes, inconsistencies and omissions in references, footnotes and quotations throughout the book. The same lengthy section of text from the 1890 AngloGerman agreement appears in full no less than three separate times. That the publisher should have sent a manuscript in this under-edited and uncorrected form to the printers is utterly surprising.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
黑暗中的尼罗河:一个有缺陷的统一体,1863-1899 年(评论)
葡萄牙探险家和德国早期在西南非洲军事存在的片段。该书对德意志帝国总理冯-卡普里维的生活和(主要是国内)政治进行了长时间的探究,并引出了 1890 年英德领土交换的谈判,该谈判创造了德国通往赞比西河的通道,被称为 "卡普里维通道"(Caprivi Zipfel)。奥库帕在这里提出了一些有趣的观点,而在国际法问题上,她显然更熟悉学术领域。接下来的 150 页涉及德国殖民军队在 1904 年至 1908 年间对赫雷罗人、纳马人和其他土著群体犯下的丑恶暴行和灭绝战争。其他一些更善于利用现有档案资料的学者已经对其中的许多内容进行了广泛论述。该书用很长的篇幅详细介绍了德国殖民时期的军事奖章、铁路和火器技术、赫雷罗人的社会组织,主要是家谱、一夫多妻制和基督教。奥库帕的主要贡献在于她对 1904 年骇人听闻的沃特伯格大屠杀之后赫雷罗人在奥马赫克沙漠所遭受的苦难进行了动情而引人入胜的叙述。不过,虽然在致谢词中指出她收集了最近被遣返的幸存者后代的采访材料,但作者既没有直接点名也没有引用她的赫雷罗消息来源。随后,该书转向德国殖民主义在纳米比亚留下的另一个遗产:卡普里维地带。奥库帕对卡普里维殖民前和殖民时期的管理、该地区的历史及其人民的讨论同样没有什么新的材料,同时也没有排除不必要的偏离和各种不准确之处。最后两章涉及殖民时期的起源和 1999 年国际法院对纳米比亚和博茨瓦纳之间关于卡西基里/塞杜杜岛的边界争端的解决。书中出现了大量的条约文本、官方信函和听证会记录,但几乎没有分析。对卡普里维感兴趣或研究非洲边界、国际和非洲习惯法的历史渊源和当前争端的学者可能会在此找到一些有趣的线索,以获得更多资料,但国际法院网站以井然有序的方式提供了大部分资料。虽然该书的外观整洁、平衡,但大部分地图、图表和照片都没有什么价值。主标题和某些章节的标题没有提供任何有关内容的线索。全书的参考文献、脚注和引文中存在无数错误、不一致和遗漏之处。1890 年英德协定中同一段冗长的文字全文出现了不下三次。出版商竟然将这样未经编辑和校正的手稿交给印刷厂,实在令人吃惊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sexual Humour in Africa: Gender, Jokes, and Societal Change ed. by Ignatius Chukwumah (review) India’s Development Diplomacy and Soft Power in Africa ed. by Kenneth King and Meera Venkatachalam (review) Understanding Zimbabwe: from liberation to authoritarianism by Sara Rich Dorman (review) The New Black Middle Class in South Africa by Roger Southall (review) The French Army and its African Soldiers: the years of decolonization by Ruth Ginio (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1