Part 2 Asylum, 7 Protection under Human Rights and General International Law

S Goodwin-GillGuy, McAdam Jane, Dunlop Emma
{"title":"Part 2 Asylum, 7 Protection under Human Rights and General International Law","authors":"S Goodwin-GillGuy, McAdam Jane, Dunlop Emma","doi":"10.1093/law/9780198808565.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores the development of the principle of non-refoulement beyond the Refugee Convention. In broad terms, this can be described as ‘complementary protection’ because the non-refoulement obligation derives from sources that are complementary to the Refugee Convention. However, though not a term of art, ‘complementary protection’ commonly implies the grant of a domestic legal status as well. Under general international law, the principle of non-refoulement is wider than its expression in article 33 of the 1951 Refugee Convention. While States have always recognized, to varying degrees, the protection needs of people falling outside the ‘refugee’ definition in article 1A(2) of the Convention, it is only in the last 25 years or so that they have begun to articulate such protection as an international legal obligation, rather than as a matter left to the discretion and humanitarian goodwill of national governments.","PeriodicalId":204360,"journal":{"name":"The Refugee in International Law","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Refugee in International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198808565.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter explores the development of the principle of non-refoulement beyond the Refugee Convention. In broad terms, this can be described as ‘complementary protection’ because the non-refoulement obligation derives from sources that are complementary to the Refugee Convention. However, though not a term of art, ‘complementary protection’ commonly implies the grant of a domestic legal status as well. Under general international law, the principle of non-refoulement is wider than its expression in article 33 of the 1951 Refugee Convention. While States have always recognized, to varying degrees, the protection needs of people falling outside the ‘refugee’ definition in article 1A(2) of the Convention, it is only in the last 25 years or so that they have begun to articulate such protection as an international legal obligation, rather than as a matter left to the discretion and humanitarian goodwill of national governments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第2部分庇护,7人权和一般国际法下的保护
本章探讨不驱回原则在《难民公约》之外的发展。从广义上讲,这可以称为“补充保护”,因为不驱回义务的来源是对《难民公约》的补充。然而,尽管不是艺术术语,“补充保护”通常也意味着授予国内法律地位。根据一般国际法,不驱回原则比1951年《难民公约》第33条所表达的更广泛。虽然各国一直在不同程度上承认不属于《公约》第1A(2)条“难民”定义的人的保护需要,但只是在过去25年左右的时间里,它们才开始将这种保护作为一项国际法律义务加以阐明,而不是作为一个留给各国政府酌情决定和人道主义善意的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Part 2 Asylum, 8 The Concept of Asylum Part 3 Protection, 11 Treaty Standards and their Implementation in National Law Part 1 Refugees, 2 Refugees Defined and Described 1 The Refugee in International Law Part 3 Protection, 12 Displacement related to the Impacts of Disasters and Climate Change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1