Tombes à dalles néolithiques (cistes et chambres) du nord-est de la péninsule Ibérique : une vision historiographique et chronologique

Juan-Francisco Gibaja, Berta Morell, Araceli Martín, F. Oms, Patricia Martín-Rodríguez, Millán Mozota Holgueras, Alba Masclans, Gerard Remolins, F. Santos, Stephanie Duboscq, María Fontanals-Coll, Mònica Oliva, Diego López Onaindia, Niccolò Mazzucco, M. E. Subirà
{"title":"Tombes à dalles néolithiques (cistes et chambres) du nord-est de la péninsule Ibérique : une vision historiographique et chronologique","authors":"Juan-Francisco Gibaja, Berta Morell, Araceli Martín, F. Oms, Patricia Martín-Rodríguez, Millán Mozota Holgueras, Alba Masclans, Gerard Remolins, F. Santos, Stephanie Duboscq, María Fontanals-Coll, Mònica Oliva, Diego López Onaindia, Niccolò Mazzucco, M. E. Subirà","doi":"10.3406/bspf.2020.15108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"EnglishEven though stone slab burials are well known in archaeological literature since the beginning of the 20th century (mostly thanks to J. Vilaro, then M. Cura, J. Castany and Ll. Guerrero), they have been largely overlooked during this last decade. Even so, numerous graves have been discovered with parallels with other contemporary - or sub-contemporary- Neolithic burials in southern France, northern Italy or Switzerland. The scarce or null visibility of the burials, their deficient state of conservation, the lack of surveying projects and the alterations caused by soil movements in agro-pastoral areas can be the reason for the few discoveries of this kind of burial during the last few years. Neolithic communities selected specific spaces and territories to bury their dead and in particular at locations between 589 m and 747 m above sea level. They used stone slabs to build two types of tombs: (1) cistas, which are cist tombs, buried and sealed tightly by the four slabs that make up the sides and the top. They can be accessed by moving the upper slab (vertical access); (2) megalithic chambers whose fundamental difference is that they are accessed from the side (horizontal access). There is an additional 20% of graves in a poor state of preservation that could not be classified. There is little osteological information as many of the graves were excavated several decades ago. Frequently a substantial part of the skeleton was not collected or the appropriate techniques were not used for optimal data recording. Most graves contain only one individual, occasionally two, and rarely three or more. The majority are adult males, but due to the poor excavation procedures described above and the loss of certain remains over time, because of the changes and transfers of the archaeological material between museums, this information is unreliable. The aim of this paper is to present the latest work carried out on the burials by a large team of scholars. We will describe the characteristics that define these burials (from the typology of the structures and buried individuals to the type of grave goods) and our analysis of these characteristics. This includes the study of the dental morphology that has allowed us to determine that the Neolithic communities of the interior of Catalonia had a greater affinity with those of southern France and perhaps even a common origin. In addition, the recent advances in biomolecular techniques (?13C and ?15N isotope analysis) have given access to information on diet, which mainly consisted of vegetables (cereals) and, in some cases, animal proteins. This contradicts the initial idea that the economy of these groups in the interior of Catalonia relied on animal husbandry. We have made important advances in the study of the grave goods with research into the geographic origin of the raw materials used to make the bone, malacological and lithic tools and ornaments, the technical systems implemented during their preparation and the tools?€? use-wear before being deposited in the burial. The lithic raw materials are comprised of flint from south-eastern France and the Ebro Basin, variscite from the Gava Mines and ornaments made with various marine species originating in the Mediterranean coast. This demonstrates the wide and complex network of inter-group contacts that existed at this time. As for the function of lithic and bone tools (knapped and polished), they show us that Neolithic societies had a double attitude when selecting grave goods: while some tools are unused and appear to have been prepared to be deposited ex profeso together, others were chosen among previously used tools. These objects show traces of use but were maintained in a perfect state of use. The tools include flint blades for harvesting (cutting) cereals or scraping hide, geometric unused microlithic projectiles, polished axes for wood and hide work, and bone awls for the transformation of soft materials. We still have to determine the function of the schist awls, which may have come from workshops located in the Pyrenees. From an experimental perspective, the current hypothesis is that they were probably used as projectile points. Finally, we will present the available radiocarbon dates as well as the statistical analysis regarding their chronological distribution and duration. Before our dating program, the chronology of stone slabs burials was based on a small number of dates, some of which were obtained from \"long life\" samples. Today we know that this type of burial was in use for between 510 and 865 years, during the period 4230-4000 cal. BC and 3490-3180 cal. BC. This indicates that these funerary practices were largely contemporary with others in Catalonia (located in the territories near the Mediterranean coast), as well as in France, Italy and Switzerland. Within the framework of this ongoing project, we aim to work on the more recently excavated burials (it is the case of Camp de la Bruna), as well as undertaking new analysis aimed at discovering the origin of certain tools and ornaments. Our priority will be to initiate a series of Zooms analyses to determine the species of bone used to make the numerous tools found in these graves. francaisLes sepultures a dalles neolithiques sont connues depuis le debut du xxe siecle, tout particulierement grâce au travail debute par J. Vilaro et poursuivi par M. Cura, J. Castany et Ll. Guerrero. Cependant, elles ont recu de la part des archeologues moins d'attention que d'autres structures funeraires (meme si elles sont souvent mentionnees dans la litterature archeologique), ce qui est surprenant. En effet, les tombes decouvertes sont nombreuses, ainsi que les paralleles avec d'autres manifestations neolithiques contemporaines ou proches dans le temps du sud de la France, du nord de l'Italie ou de la Suisse. Il s'est donc avere necessaire d'effectuer une serie d'analyses pour ameliorer nos connaissances a leur sujet. La faible visibilite de ces tombes (ou l'absence de visibilite), leur mauvais etat de conservation, le manque de prospections et les degradations dues aux remaniements des sols des zones agropastorales dans lesquels elles se trouvent, peuvent etre les causes du nombre peu eleve de decouvertes realisees ces dernieres decennies. L'objectif de cet article est de presenter les derniers resultats obtenus par notre equipe de chercheurs reunie autour de l'etude de ces tombes. Nous presenterons l'etat de la question sur leur historiographie, ainsi que les caracteristiques qui les definissent, en partant des structures pour arriver aux personnes inhumees et au mobilier funeraire associe. Il est important d'insister sur l'existence de nouvelles datations radiocarbone et sur les analyses statistiques effectuees, car elles nous ont permis d'evaluer la distribution chronologique des tombes et leur duree d'utilisation. Jusqu'a la realisation de ce programme de datation, la chronologie des sepultures a dalles etait assez incertaine en raison du nombre restreint de dates, dont certaines obtenues a partir d'echantillons de longue duree de vie. Ces donnees ont servi de trait d'union pour etablir des liens avec d'autres manifestations funeraires du neolithique d'Europe centrale et occidentale.","PeriodicalId":375388,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3406/bspf.2020.15108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

EnglishEven though stone slab burials are well known in archaeological literature since the beginning of the 20th century (mostly thanks to J. Vilaro, then M. Cura, J. Castany and Ll. Guerrero), they have been largely overlooked during this last decade. Even so, numerous graves have been discovered with parallels with other contemporary - or sub-contemporary- Neolithic burials in southern France, northern Italy or Switzerland. The scarce or null visibility of the burials, their deficient state of conservation, the lack of surveying projects and the alterations caused by soil movements in agro-pastoral areas can be the reason for the few discoveries of this kind of burial during the last few years. Neolithic communities selected specific spaces and territories to bury their dead and in particular at locations between 589 m and 747 m above sea level. They used stone slabs to build two types of tombs: (1) cistas, which are cist tombs, buried and sealed tightly by the four slabs that make up the sides and the top. They can be accessed by moving the upper slab (vertical access); (2) megalithic chambers whose fundamental difference is that they are accessed from the side (horizontal access). There is an additional 20% of graves in a poor state of preservation that could not be classified. There is little osteological information as many of the graves were excavated several decades ago. Frequently a substantial part of the skeleton was not collected or the appropriate techniques were not used for optimal data recording. Most graves contain only one individual, occasionally two, and rarely three or more. The majority are adult males, but due to the poor excavation procedures described above and the loss of certain remains over time, because of the changes and transfers of the archaeological material between museums, this information is unreliable. The aim of this paper is to present the latest work carried out on the burials by a large team of scholars. We will describe the characteristics that define these burials (from the typology of the structures and buried individuals to the type of grave goods) and our analysis of these characteristics. This includes the study of the dental morphology that has allowed us to determine that the Neolithic communities of the interior of Catalonia had a greater affinity with those of southern France and perhaps even a common origin. In addition, the recent advances in biomolecular techniques (?13C and ?15N isotope analysis) have given access to information on diet, which mainly consisted of vegetables (cereals) and, in some cases, animal proteins. This contradicts the initial idea that the economy of these groups in the interior of Catalonia relied on animal husbandry. We have made important advances in the study of the grave goods with research into the geographic origin of the raw materials used to make the bone, malacological and lithic tools and ornaments, the technical systems implemented during their preparation and the tools?€? use-wear before being deposited in the burial. The lithic raw materials are comprised of flint from south-eastern France and the Ebro Basin, variscite from the Gava Mines and ornaments made with various marine species originating in the Mediterranean coast. This demonstrates the wide and complex network of inter-group contacts that existed at this time. As for the function of lithic and bone tools (knapped and polished), they show us that Neolithic societies had a double attitude when selecting grave goods: while some tools are unused and appear to have been prepared to be deposited ex profeso together, others were chosen among previously used tools. These objects show traces of use but were maintained in a perfect state of use. The tools include flint blades for harvesting (cutting) cereals or scraping hide, geometric unused microlithic projectiles, polished axes for wood and hide work, and bone awls for the transformation of soft materials. We still have to determine the function of the schist awls, which may have come from workshops located in the Pyrenees. From an experimental perspective, the current hypothesis is that they were probably used as projectile points. Finally, we will present the available radiocarbon dates as well as the statistical analysis regarding their chronological distribution and duration. Before our dating program, the chronology of stone slabs burials was based on a small number of dates, some of which were obtained from "long life" samples. Today we know that this type of burial was in use for between 510 and 865 years, during the period 4230-4000 cal. BC and 3490-3180 cal. BC. This indicates that these funerary practices were largely contemporary with others in Catalonia (located in the territories near the Mediterranean coast), as well as in France, Italy and Switzerland. Within the framework of this ongoing project, we aim to work on the more recently excavated burials (it is the case of Camp de la Bruna), as well as undertaking new analysis aimed at discovering the origin of certain tools and ornaments. Our priority will be to initiate a series of Zooms analyses to determine the species of bone used to make the numerous tools found in these graves. francaisLes sepultures a dalles neolithiques sont connues depuis le debut du xxe siecle, tout particulierement grâce au travail debute par J. Vilaro et poursuivi par M. Cura, J. Castany et Ll. Guerrero. Cependant, elles ont recu de la part des archeologues moins d'attention que d'autres structures funeraires (meme si elles sont souvent mentionnees dans la litterature archeologique), ce qui est surprenant. En effet, les tombes decouvertes sont nombreuses, ainsi que les paralleles avec d'autres manifestations neolithiques contemporaines ou proches dans le temps du sud de la France, du nord de l'Italie ou de la Suisse. Il s'est donc avere necessaire d'effectuer une serie d'analyses pour ameliorer nos connaissances a leur sujet. La faible visibilite de ces tombes (ou l'absence de visibilite), leur mauvais etat de conservation, le manque de prospections et les degradations dues aux remaniements des sols des zones agropastorales dans lesquels elles se trouvent, peuvent etre les causes du nombre peu eleve de decouvertes realisees ces dernieres decennies. L'objectif de cet article est de presenter les derniers resultats obtenus par notre equipe de chercheurs reunie autour de l'etude de ces tombes. Nous presenterons l'etat de la question sur leur historiographie, ainsi que les caracteristiques qui les definissent, en partant des structures pour arriver aux personnes inhumees et au mobilier funeraire associe. Il est important d'insister sur l'existence de nouvelles datations radiocarbone et sur les analyses statistiques effectuees, car elles nous ont permis d'evaluer la distribution chronologique des tombes et leur duree d'utilisation. Jusqu'a la realisation de ce programme de datation, la chronologie des sepultures a dalles etait assez incertaine en raison du nombre restreint de dates, dont certaines obtenues a partir d'echantillons de longue duree de vie. Ces donnees ont servi de trait d'union pour etablir des liens avec d'autres manifestations funeraires du neolithique d'Europe centrale et occidentale.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊比利亚半岛东北部新石器时代的石板坟墓(石棺和房间):历史和年代的观点
尽管自20世纪初以来,石板墓葬在考古文献中就广为人知(主要归功于J.维拉罗,然后是M.库拉,J.卡斯塔尼和l。格雷罗),在过去的十年里,他们在很大程度上被忽视了。即便如此,在法国南部、意大利北部或瑞士发现了许多与其他当代或亚当代新石器时代墓葬相似的坟墓。在过去的几年里,这种墓葬的发现很少或根本看不到,它们的保护状况不佳,缺乏调查项目以及农牧区土壤运动造成的变化可能是导致这种墓葬很少被发现的原因。新石器时代的社区选择特定的空间和领土来埋葬他们的死者,特别是在海拔589米到747米之间的地方。他们用石板建造了两种类型的坟墓:(1)基斯塔,这是基斯塔墓,由组成侧面和顶部的四块石板埋葬并紧密密封。它们可以通过移动上部板(垂直通道)进入;(2)巨石室,其根本区别在于从侧面进入(水平进入)。另外还有20%的坟墓保存状况不佳,无法分类。由于许多坟墓是几十年前挖掘出来的,因此很少有骨学信息。通常没有收集骨架的大部分,或者没有使用适当的技术进行最佳数据记录。大多数坟墓里只有一个人,偶尔有两个,很少有三个或更多。大多数是成年男性,但由于上面描述的挖掘程序不佳,以及随着时间的推移某些遗骸的丢失,由于博物馆之间考古材料的变化和转移,这些信息是不可靠的。本文的目的是介绍一个庞大的学者团队对墓葬进行的最新工作。我们将描述这些墓葬的特征(从结构的类型学和埋葬的个体到墓葬的类型)以及我们对这些特征的分析。这包括对牙齿形态的研究,这使我们能够确定加泰罗尼亚内陆的新石器时代社区与法国南部的社区有更大的亲和力,甚至可能有共同的起源。此外,生物分子技术的最新进展(?13C和15N同位素分析)提供了有关饮食的信息,主要由蔬菜(谷物)组成,在某些情况下,还包括动物蛋白质。这与最初的想法相矛盾,即加泰罗尼亚内陆这些群体的经济依赖于畜牧业。我们在墓葬物品的研究方面取得了重要进展,研究了用于制作骨头的原材料的地理来源,石器和石器工具和装饰品,在准备过程中实施的技术系统以及工具。在埋葬前的使用磨损。石制原料包括来自法国东南部和埃布罗盆地的燧石、来自加瓦矿的variscite以及源自地中海沿岸的各种海洋物种制成的装饰品。这表明当时存在着广泛而复杂的群体间联系网络。至于石器和骨工具的功能(被敲击和抛光),它们向我们展示了新石器社会在选择陪葬品时的双重态度:有些工具没有使用过,似乎已经准备好一起存放,而其他工具则是从以前使用过的工具中选择的。这些物品虽有使用过的痕迹,但仍保持着完好的使用状态。这些工具包括用于收割(切割)谷物或刮皮的燧石刀片,未使用的几何微石弹丸,用于木材和皮革工作的抛光轴,以及用于转换软材料的骨锥。我们仍然需要确定片岩锥的功能,它们可能来自比利牛斯山脉的作坊。从实验的角度来看,目前的假设是它们可能被用作抛射点。最后,我们将介绍现有的放射性碳年代以及关于它们的时间分布和持续时间的统计分析。在我们的测年计划之前,石板墓葬的年表是基于少量的日期,其中一些是从“长寿”样本中获得的。今天我们知道,这种类型的墓葬在公元前4230-4000年和公元前3490-3180年之间使用了510至865年。这表明,这些丧葬习俗在很大程度上与加泰罗尼亚(位于地中海沿岸附近的地区)以及法国、意大利和瑞士的其他习俗是同时代的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
La roche gravée du vallon du Haut-Couletta (Fontan, Alpes-Maritimes) Les stèles anthropomorphes de la Bastidonne (Trets, Bouches-du-Rhône) et leur contexte du Néolithique moyen Diversité technique des débitages laminaires au Néolithique ancien à Vaux-et-Borset (Hesbaye, Belgique) : manières de faire, problèmes d’interprétation et perspectives anthropologiques Découverte d’une grande stèle anthropomorphe gravée en Île-de-France orientale (la Grande Maison, Chamigny, Seine-et-Marne) De nouvelles dates 14C pour la faune pléistocène du gouffre d’Habarra (Arudy, Pyrénées-Atlantiques)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1