Annington versus Deutsche Annington: Private Equity and Housing in the Anglo-Saxon and Rhenish Contexts

Willem K. Korthals Altes
{"title":"Annington versus Deutsche Annington: Private Equity and Housing in the Anglo-Saxon and Rhenish Contexts","authors":"Willem K. Korthals Altes","doi":"10.1080/14036096.2018.1479300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Under the Rhenish model of capitalism the interests of other stakeholders than shareholders are essential to the interests of the firm. However, Rhenish institutions in Germany have been changing. In the housing sector, many organizations that promoted the provision of affordable housing are currently managed by private equity firms promoting shareholders’ interests. This paper presents a dual case study on two housing providers: Annington in the UK, and Deutsche Annington in Germany which were owned by the same private equity investor, Terra Firma. The paper – based on this analysis of a single approach to the management of two comparable firms in the Rhenish and Anglo-Saxon contexts – considers the question of whether the Rhenish model is being swept away by the shareholders revolution. The paper concludes that this is not the case and that certain differences between these cases reflect the continuing differences between the Anglo-Saxon and Rhenish models of capitalism.","PeriodicalId":338089,"journal":{"name":"Housing, Theory and Society","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Housing, Theory and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2018.1479300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Under the Rhenish model of capitalism the interests of other stakeholders than shareholders are essential to the interests of the firm. However, Rhenish institutions in Germany have been changing. In the housing sector, many organizations that promoted the provision of affordable housing are currently managed by private equity firms promoting shareholders’ interests. This paper presents a dual case study on two housing providers: Annington in the UK, and Deutsche Annington in Germany which were owned by the same private equity investor, Terra Firma. The paper – based on this analysis of a single approach to the management of two comparable firms in the Rhenish and Anglo-Saxon contexts – considers the question of whether the Rhenish model is being swept away by the shareholders revolution. The paper concludes that this is not the case and that certain differences between these cases reflect the continuing differences between the Anglo-Saxon and Rhenish models of capitalism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安宁顿与德意志安宁顿:盎格鲁-撒克逊和莱茵语境下的私募股权和住房
在资本主义的莱茵模型下,股东以外的其他利益相关者的利益对企业的利益至关重要。然而,德国的莱茵语机构一直在发生变化。在住房领域,许多推动提供经济适用房的组织目前由促进股东利益的私募股权公司管理。本文对两家住房供应商进行了双重案例研究:英国的安宁顿(Annington)和德国的德意志安宁顿(Deutsche Annington),这两家公司由同一家私募股权投资者Terra Firma拥有。本文基于对两家可比较公司在莱茵和盎格鲁-撒克逊背景下的单一管理方法的分析,考虑了莱茵模式是否正在被股东革命扫除的问题。这篇论文的结论是,事实并非如此,这些案例之间的某些差异反映了盎格鲁-撒克逊和莱茵资本主义模式之间的持续差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Layers of Commodification in the City of Decommodification: The Transformation of Regulated Private Renting in Vienna Intergenerational Support and the Financial Strategies of Young Homebuyers in Shanghai Capturing Low Demand Through Long Time-On-Market: Functional Obsolescence and Owner Resignation Among Old Rental Houses Allocating Housing Assistance After the Decentring of Social Housing: From Rationing to Social Sorting Homeownership Habitus and Residential Practice of Highly-Skilled Chinese Migrants in the Netherlands
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1