Stabilization Bounds for Influence Propagation from a Random Initial State

P. Papp, Roger Wattenhofer
{"title":"Stabilization Bounds for Influence Propagation from a Random Initial State","authors":"P. Papp, Roger Wattenhofer","doi":"10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2021.83","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the stabilization time of two common types of influence propagation. In majority processes, nodes in a graph want to switch to the most frequent state in their neighborhood, while in minority processes, nodes want to switch to the least frequent state in their neighborhood. We consider the sequential model of these processes, and assume that every node starts out from a uniform random state. We first show that if nodes change their state for any small improvement in the process, then stabilization can last for up to $\\Theta(n^2)$ steps in both cases. Furthermore, we also study the proportional switching case, when nodes only decide to change their state if they are in conflict with a $\\frac{1+\\lambda}{2}$ fraction of their neighbors, for some parameter $\\lambda \\in (0,1)$. In this case, we show that if $\\lambda<\\frac{1}{3}$, then there is a construction where stabilization can indeed last for $\\Omega(n^{1+c})$ steps for some constant $c>0$. On the other hand, if $\\lambda>\\frac{1}{2}$, we prove that the stabilization time of the processes is upper-bounded by $O(n \\cdot \\log{n})$.","PeriodicalId":369104,"journal":{"name":"International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2021.83","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We study the stabilization time of two common types of influence propagation. In majority processes, nodes in a graph want to switch to the most frequent state in their neighborhood, while in minority processes, nodes want to switch to the least frequent state in their neighborhood. We consider the sequential model of these processes, and assume that every node starts out from a uniform random state. We first show that if nodes change their state for any small improvement in the process, then stabilization can last for up to $\Theta(n^2)$ steps in both cases. Furthermore, we also study the proportional switching case, when nodes only decide to change their state if they are in conflict with a $\frac{1+\lambda}{2}$ fraction of their neighbors, for some parameter $\lambda \in (0,1)$. In this case, we show that if $\lambda<\frac{1}{3}$, then there is a construction where stabilization can indeed last for $\Omega(n^{1+c})$ steps for some constant $c>0$. On the other hand, if $\lambda>\frac{1}{2}$, we prove that the stabilization time of the processes is upper-bounded by $O(n \cdot \log{n})$.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
随机初始状态影响传播的镇定界
研究了两种常见影响传播类型的稳定时间。在多数进程中,图中的节点希望切换到其邻居中最频繁的状态,而在少数进程中,节点希望切换到其邻居中最不频繁的状态。我们考虑这些过程的顺序模型,并假设每个节点从均匀随机状态开始。我们首先说明,如果节点为了过程中的任何小改进而改变其状态,那么在这两种情况下,稳定都可以持续$\Theta(n^2)$步。此外,我们还研究了比例切换情况,当节点只有在与某个参数$\lambda \in (0,1)$的邻居的$\frac{1+\lambda}{2}$部分发生冲突时才决定改变自己的状态。在本例中,我们显示如果$\lambda0$。另一方面,如果$\lambda>\frac{1}{2}$,我们证明了过程的稳定时间是$O(n \cdot \log{n})$的上界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
FPT Approximation and Subexponential Algorithms for Covering Few or Many Edges Dynamic constant time parallel graph algorithms with sub-linear work Polynomial-Delay Enumeration of Large Maximal Common Independent Sets in Two Matroids Entropic Risk for Turn-Based Stochastic Games On the Expressive Power of Regular Expressions with Backreferences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1