Development of the Civilizational Perspective in Sociological Analysis in the Last Decades

{"title":"Development of the Civilizational Perspective in Sociological Analysis in the Last Decades","authors":"","doi":"10.37075/isa.2021.2.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the rethinking and rediscovery of “civilization” and “civilizations” as a theoretical perspective in contemporary sociology. In a broader historical context, the trajectories and interactions of social sciences with the civilizational concept are traced, within which the self-determination of sociology has taken place, as well as the construction and transformation of its research programs. The new development of the civilizational dimensions in sociological analysis, which began after the 1970s, stands out, based on the classical sources of the French and German schools of thought, and further developed as an alternative to the one-sided “cultural” and “social” reductionism and determinism in sociology. The article draws attention to the important contributions and the original theoretical concepts of S.H. Eisenstadt and J.P. Arnason, which have wide international recognition, but are relatively little known in Bulgaria. Overcoming the dominance of culture as a civilization-forming factor allows these authors to develop broader theoretical and interpretive models. They are centered on the relationship between culture and other fields of social life, including the structures of political and economic power, and are considered in the specific temporal and spatial context of the accompanying intercivilizational encounters. The place and importance of the problems of civilizations in different analytical perspectives and theoretical directions are outlined, as well as the opportunities it offers for the study of contemporary processes and political realities.","PeriodicalId":435790,"journal":{"name":"Economic and social alternatives","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic and social alternatives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37075/isa.2021.2.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the rethinking and rediscovery of “civilization” and “civilizations” as a theoretical perspective in contemporary sociology. In a broader historical context, the trajectories and interactions of social sciences with the civilizational concept are traced, within which the self-determination of sociology has taken place, as well as the construction and transformation of its research programs. The new development of the civilizational dimensions in sociological analysis, which began after the 1970s, stands out, based on the classical sources of the French and German schools of thought, and further developed as an alternative to the one-sided “cultural” and “social” reductionism and determinism in sociology. The article draws attention to the important contributions and the original theoretical concepts of S.H. Eisenstadt and J.P. Arnason, which have wide international recognition, but are relatively little known in Bulgaria. Overcoming the dominance of culture as a civilization-forming factor allows these authors to develop broader theoretical and interpretive models. They are centered on the relationship between culture and other fields of social life, including the structures of political and economic power, and are considered in the specific temporal and spatial context of the accompanying intercivilizational encounters. The place and importance of the problems of civilizations in different analytical perspectives and theoretical directions are outlined, as well as the opportunities it offers for the study of contemporary processes and political realities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
近几十年来社会学分析中文明视角的发展
本文致力于从当代社会学的理论视角对“文明”和“文明”进行反思和再发现。在更广阔的历史背景下,追踪社会科学与文明概念的轨迹和相互作用,其中社会学的自决已经发生,以及其研究计划的建设和转变。20世纪70年代以后,社会学分析中文明维度的新发展在法国和德国学派思想的经典来源的基础上脱颖而出,并进一步发展成为社会学中片面的“文化”和“社会”还原论和决定论的替代品。本文着重介绍了S.H. Eisenstadt和J.P. Arnason的重要贡献和原创的理论概念,这些理论在国际上得到了广泛的认可,但在保加利亚却鲜为人知。克服文化作为文明形成因素的主导地位,使这些作者能够发展更广泛的理论和解释模型。它们以文化与社会生活的其他领域之间的关系为中心,包括政治和经济权力的结构,并在伴随的文明间遭遇的特定时间和空间背景下进行考虑。在不同的分析观点和理论方向中概述了文明问题的地位和重要性,以及它为研究当代进程和政治现实提供的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transformation of the Administrative Service Model in the Local Administration Efficiency of Production Factors Concerning the Gross Value Added in Bulgaria Analysis of Bilateral Trade between Bulgaria and Ukraine About Personalized Education in Accounting Subjects in Higher Education Institutions Macroeconomic Health Shocks and Business Cycle Dynamics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1